Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f ..~ . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM1FALL 1994" VOL.14, NO.3 <br /> <br />ing in untreated areas. The birds were able <br />to find other food, so that nesting success <br />was not significantly impacted.78 In New <br />Hampshire, when B.t.-treatment reduced <br />caterpillar abundance, black-throated blue <br />warblers made fewer nesting attempts and <br />also brought fewer caterpillars to their nest- <br />lings.79 A Canadian study found that num- <br />bers of caterpillars, followed by numbers of <br />two species of warblers and a thrush, were <br />reduced by B.t. treatment. In addition, there <br />were fewer spruce grouse chicks in B.t. <br />treated areas, and the chicks in those areas <br />grew more slowly than chicks in untreated <br />areas.80 <br />There is also some evidence tllat B.t. <br />can be directly toxic to birds. A study of <br />the effects of application of Dipel to ring- <br />neck pheasant eggs found that hatching was <br />only half as successful as hatching of un- <br />treated eggs. Because the Dipel was applied <br />with a spreader-sti~ compound (Plyac) <br />the decrease in hatching may be a result of <br />the Plyac and not the B.L product. 81 <br />Other animals: Because shrews often <br />feed on caterp~, impacts from B.t. treat- <br />ments are likely. A study in northern <br />Ontario (Canada) found that treatment with <br />Dipel changed the structure of the shrew <br />population. Adult males emigrated, so that <br />the proportion of juveniles increased. The <br />juveniles and adult females who did not <br />emigrate shifted from a diet of caterpillars <br />to alternative prey.82 <br />Foray 48B at high concentrations (about <br />3 percent) is acutely toxic to rainbow trout, <br />probably because the product is highly <br />acidic.83 <br />B.t.i. treatments can also affect other <br />animals. Low concentrations of B.t.i. en- <br />dotoxins decrease the weight of tadpoles and <br />delay their metamorphosis.84 The B.t.i. <br />formulation Vectobac is acutely toxic to <br />fathead minnows, probably because "inerrs" <br />in the produa deplete the dissolved oxygen <br />in water.8S The B.t.i. formulation Teknar <br />was acucely toxic to brook trout fry, prob- <br />ably because of xylene used as an "inen" in <br />the product.86 <br />Comparison with synthetic insecticides: <br />Where comparative studies have been done, <br />the ecological impacts of a B.t. treatment <br />are almost always less than those of syn- <br /> <br />Figure 5 <br />Effect of B.t. Treatment on the <br />Number of Oak.feeding Moths <br />near Elmira, Oregon <br /> <br />. treated <br /> <br />o untreated <br /> <br />1992. The mode of action of Bacillus thuringlen- <br />sls endotoxins. Ann. Rev. Ent.37:615-636. <br />10. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticide Programs. 1990. <br />Pesticide Fact Sheet: Bacillus thurlnglensls. <br />Washington, DC. (December.) <br />11. Novo Nordlsk. Enzyme Toxicology Lab. 1990. <br />Bacillus thuringlensis var. kurstakt. Acute oraltox- <br />icity/pathogenicity stuc/y In rats given B.l.k. tox <br />batch PPQ 2843 (NB 75). Danbury, CT: (July <br />20.) . <br />12. Berg, N.. E.W. Sorensen and J.M. Overholt. 1991. <br />Summary of acute toxicology in support of for- <br />mula amendment of Foray 48B. Danbury, CT: <br />Novo Nordisk. (May 21.) <br />13. U.S. EPA.Office of Pesticide Programs. 1994. <br />Tox one-liners. Bacillus thuringlensls Berliner. <br />Washington. D.C. (August 1.) <br />14. Oshodi, R.O. and R. Macnaughlan. 1990. B.t.k. <br />preparation: Acute Inhalation toxicity Sluc/y in rats. <br />Volume 6. Danbury. CT: Novo Nordlsk. (April 20.) <br />15. Berg, N. 1990. Bacillus thuringlensls var. kurstalci, <br />batch BBB 0073: Acute intravenous toxicity/patho- <br />gllnlcity study in {!Its. Volume 7. Danbury, CT: <br />Novo Nordisk. (June 19.) <br />16. Novo Nordisk. Enzyme Toxicology Lab. 1990. <br />Acute dennal toxicity stuc/y in rabbits wilh lhe <br />end product Foray 48B, batch BBN 6057. <br />Danbury. CT. (December 12.) <br />Siegel, J.P. and J.A. Shadduck. 1988. Mamma- <br />lian safety of Bacillus thuringlensis Israelensls. In <br />de Barjac, H. and D.J. Sutherland. (ed) Bacterial <br />control of mosquitoes & black flies: Biochemislry, <br />genetics & applications of Bacillus thuringlensls <br />Israelensls and Bacil/us sphaerlcus. New <br />Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press. <br />18. Siegel, J.P. and J.A. Shadduck. 1990. Clearance <br />of Bacillus sphaericus and Bacillus thuringlensls <br />ssp. Israelensis from mammals. J. Econ. Ent. <br />83(2):347-355. <br />Thomas, W.E. and D.J.Ellar. 1983. Bacillus <br />thuringlensls var. Israelensis crystal delta-endol- <br />oxin: Effects on insect and mammalian cells In <br />vitro and in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 60: 181-197. <br />20. Ware, G.W. 1983. Pesticides: Theory and appli- <br />cation. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co. <br />21. Samples, J.R. and H. Buettner. 1983. Ocular In- <br />fection causad by a biological insecticide. J. In- <br />fectious Dis. 148(3):614. <br />22. Green, M., et at 1990. Public health implications <br />of the microbial peslicide Bacillus thuringlensls. <br />An epidemiological Sluc/y, Oregon, 1985-86. Amer. <br />J. Public Health. 80(7):848-852. <br />23. Noble, M.A., P.O. Riben and G.J. Cook. 1992. <br />Microbiological and epidemiological surveillance <br />program to monitor the health effects 01 Foray <br />48B BTK spray. (September 30.) Vancouver, B.C.: <br />Ministry of Forests. Frov:nce of British Columbia. <br />24. Edamura, A., MO. 1992. Affidavit of the Federal <br />Court of Canada, Trial Division. Dale Edwards <br />and Citizens Against Aerial Spraying vs. Her Maj- <br />esty the Queen, Represented by the Minister of <br />Agriculture. (May 6.) <br />25. Cameron, D.A., MD. 1992. Leller to Dr. F.J. <br />Blalherwick, Vancouver Medical Health Officer. <br />(March 17.) <br />26. Washington State Department of Health. 1993. <br />Report of health surveillance aclivities: Asian <br />gypsy moth control program. Olympia, WA. <br />(March.) <br />27. Meretoja, T. et at 1977. Mutagenicity of Bacillus <br />thurlnglensls exotoxin. I. Mammalian lesls. <br />Heredllus 85:105-112. <br />28. Drobniewski, FA 1994. A Review: The safety of <br />Bacillus species as insect vector conlrol agents. <br />J. Appl. Bacteriol. 76:101-109. <br />29. Bennett, R.W. and S.M. Harmon. 1990. Bacillus <br />cereus Food Poisoning. Chapter 8. In Balows, A. <br />et at (ads.). Laboratory diagnosis of Infectious <br />diseases: Principles and practice. Volume 1: Bac- <br /> <br />.17. <br /> <br />NORTHWEST COALITION FOR ALTERNATIVES TO PESTICIDES1NCAP <br />P. O. BOX 1 393, E U G ENE, 0 REG 0 N 97440 / (503) 344 - 5 0 4 4 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />c <br />Q) <br />Ul <br />li 20 <br />Ul <br />Q) <br />u <br />8. 15 <br />Ul <br />'0 <br />.. <br />1l 10 <br />E <br />:3 <br />Z <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />1986 - 1986". <br />prespray postspray <br /> <br />Source: Miller, J.C. 1990. Field assessment of a <br />microbial pest control agent on nontarget . <br />Lepidoptera. Arner. Entomol. (Summer):135-139. <br /> <br />1987. <br /> <br />1988 <br /> <br />B.t. applications to kill gypsy moths in Oregon <br />caused a three-year decrease in the number of 19. <br />oak-feeding moth species. . <br /> <br />thetic insecticides. For example, B.t. treat- <br />ment of collards caused less of an increase <br />in aphid numbers than did treacinent with <br />carbaryl, which killed many aphid preda- <br />tors.64 Vectobac was much less acutely toxic <br />to an estuary fish than other mosquito in- <br />secticides including temephos, fenoxycarb, <br />diflubenzuron, and memoprene.87 ... <br /> <br />References <br /> <br />1. De Barjac, H. and E. Frachon. 1990. Classifica- <br />tion of Bacillus thurlnglensls strains. <br />Entomophaga. 35(2):233-240. <br />2. EUis, A. 1991. BTK. Unpublished report Winnipeg, <br />MB, Canada: Prairie Pest Management. (January.) <br />3. Lambert. B. and M. Peferoen. 1992. Insecticidal <br />promise of Bacillus thuringiensls. BioScience <br />42(2):112-122. <br />4. Jenkins, J. 1992. Environmental Toxicology and <br />Chemistry Memo. Subject: B.t. Corvallis, OR: Or- <br />egon State University Extension Service. <br />5. Feitelson, J.S., J. Payne and L. Kim. 1992. Bacil- <br />lus thuringlensis. Insects and beyond. Blofrech- <br />nology 10:271-275. (March.) <br />6. Farm Chemicals Handbook. 1992. Willoughby, <br />OH: Meister Publishing Company. . <br />7. Entwistle, P.F., et at (ads.) 1993. Bacillus thuring- <br />lensls, An environmental biopesticide: Theory and <br />practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons. <br />8. British Columbia Ministry of Heallh. 1992. Bacil- <br />lus thuringiensis. Unpublished report (December 3.) <br />9. Gill, S.S.. E.A. Cowles and P.V. Pietrantonio. <br /> <br />19 <br />