Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />c <br />TABLE 3 m <br />Correlation Coefficients (r) between Proportional Stock Density and Density, Relative Abundance, Condition, y <br />or Rate Functions for Single Species as Reported by Various Authors <br /> <br />Species Density CPUEa Wrb Recruitment Growth Mortality Ref. w <br />Largemouth bass Inverse° -0.64 Reynolds and Babb (1978) - <br />-0.85 Gabelhouse (1984b) w <br />-0.70 Guy and Willis (1990) <br />-0.98 Saffel et al. (1990) <br /> 0.694 -0.524 Miranda (1983) <br /> -0.75e Wege and Anderson (1978), <br />-0.79 Boxrucker (1987) <br />Bluegill -0.85 0.87 Novinger and Legler (1978) <br />Crappies 0.90 Gabelhouse (1984b) <br />Northern pike 0.59' 0.969 Willis and Scalet (1989) <br />~"' Walleye 0.36 Murphy et al. (1990) <br />Sauger 0.38 Guy et al. (1990) <br />Yellow perch 0.27h 0.85' Willis et at. (1991) <br />Brook trout -0.76 0.81 Johnson et al. (1992) <br />CPUE =catch per unit effort. <br />n Wr =relative weight. <br />Correlation coefficient not reported. ~ <br />e The coefficient of determination for atwo-variable multiple regression model with PSD as the dependent variable and growth and mortality as ~ <br />independent variables had RZ = 0.71 ~ <br />e This correlation was reported for relative stock density of stock- to quality-length fzsh, which is the complement of PSD (the two always add to p <br />100). m <br />z <br />j The correlation coefficient increased to 0.75 for spring samples only. cn <br />a Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.78 to 0.96 for correlations between PSD and length-at-age data. <br />~ The correlation coefficient increased to 0.80 for fall samples only. Z <br />' Correlation coefficients of PSD with various growth data ranged from 0.11 to 0.85. ~ <br />C7 <br />m <br />