Laserfiche WebLink
<br />travel time throu~h the side channel. the water at its lower <br />end might be considerahlv warmer. One solution is to treat <br />the sid~ channel as an independent stream. By determining <br />the inlet temperature and side channel flow from indepen- <br />dent one-dimensional models of the main body of the river. <br />a simple temperature model can be used to calculate temper- <br />atures in the side channel. <br />Some backwaters meet none of the descriptions given <br />above, but are formed as depressions along the bank or on <br />the lee sides of point bars in the river. In such areas, the <br />concentrations of dissolved chemicals may be very close to <br />those in the main channel, and a one dimensional water qual- <br />ity model may be totally adequate. However, if there is con- <br />siderable disparity. between the temperature measured in <br />these backwaters and in the main channel, a combination of <br />theory and empiricism may be required. The simplest con- <br />ceptual approach is to develop a series of monthly or sea- <br />sonal regressions between the temperature in the backwater <br />and the average temperature ofthe main channel. Then, by <br />using a physical process model on the main stream, one can <br />predict the average temperature at the longitudinal location <br />of the backwater. The backwater temperature. can then be <br />estimated by using the appropriate regression. Use of this <br />approach dictates accounting for local channel features such <br />as orientation, topographic shading (e.g., canyon walls), <br />and vegetation that affect the amount of sunlight reaching <br />a specific area of stream. If these variables are not accounted <br />for, it is unlikely that a consistent relation will be found <br />between main channel and backwater temperature. Either <br />the data must be stratified according to similar topographic <br />features, or they must be entered as variables in a multiple <br />regression equation. <br /> <br />Simulations in Specialized Habitats <br /> <br />Side Channels - We illustrate the procedures used in the <br />analysis of side channel habitats by referring to the Palisade <br />site on the Colorado River near Grand Junction, Colorado. <br />The river in this vicinity is typified by repetitive cycles con- <br />sisting of a small rapids, a long deep pool, and an island with <br />a divided flow section (Fig. 4). The species of interest in <br />this section is the Colorado squaw fish (Prychocheilus <br />lucius), which uses a variety of microhabitat types at various <br />phases of its life history. Although the adults are believed <br />to spawn over coarse substrates in fast water, they otherwise <br />live in deep pools and eddies. Shallow backwaters are <br />apparently necessary for rearing young squawfish (Tyus et <br />al. 1984; USFWS 1985)4. Ail of these habitat types are <br />present at the Palisade site, but most of the shallow back- <br />water habitat is associated with the small side channel on <br />the southeast side of the island (Fig. 4). The morphology <br />of the side channel is similar to that of a small stream, with <br />a riffle-pool sequence repeating about every 100 m. (The <br />distance between riffles and pools in the main channel is <br />more nearly 2000 m.) <br />Most hydraulic simulations must be started at a hydraulic <br />control, a physical feature in the channel that establishes the <br />stage-discharge relation for an upsteam section of river. <br />However, the first side channel transect (i.e., the south end <br /> <br />4 U.S. fish and Wildlife Service. 1985. Unpublished data. <br />Regional Office, U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, CO. <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br /> <br />Gravel Road <br /> <br />N <br /> <br />'0 <br />., <br />o <br />a: <br />on <br />(') <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />LEGEND <br /> <br />o Benchmark <br />. Headpin <br />- Transect <br /> <br />FrG, 4. A microhabitat study site on the Colorado River showing <br />transects, benchmarks, and headpin locations. <br /> <br />of transect 5 in Fig. 4) is a variable backwater; the stage <br />at this location is determined by the stage at transect 4, <br />which is ultimately controlled at transect 1. There is a clear <br />division of flow between the north and south ends of transect <br />5. The water surface elevation is about 0.5 m higher on the <br />north side than on the south side. To enable treatment of the <br />side channel as a separate stream, the stage-discharge rela- <br />tionship at transect 5 was determined empirically. Once this <br />determination was made, a starting water surface elevation <br />was known, and the hydraulic simulation could proceed. <br />The second relation that was needed was the amount of dis- <br />charge in the side channel, during different discharges in the <br />main channel. Transect 7 on the main channel and transect <br />H on the side channel were placed to determine the total dis- <br />charge at which flow into the side channel ceased. The rela- <br />tion between discharge of the side channel and of the main <br />channel is shown in Fig. 5. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />w <br />0 <br />a:: <br />< 4.5 <br />:I: <br />0 <br />12,.. <br />0- <br />I <br />-' ., 3 <br />w. <br />z'" <br />Z E <br /><- <br />:I: <br />0 1,5 <br />w <br />Q <br />rn <br /> 0 <br /> 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 <br /> <br />TOTAL DISCHARGE Cm3.s-1) <br /> <br />FIG. 5. Relation between total discharge and side channel dis- <br />charge at Palisade site, Colorado River. <br /> <br />t",... <br />i: <br />r: <br /> <br />fo.' <br />t: <br />;".- <br />~> <br /> <br />" <br />. <br />i <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />f <br />~ <br />f <br />1 <br />. <br />f <br />f <br />f <br />, <br />