Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />struction of the railroad, a Corps of <br />Engineers 404 permit was also required. These <br />approvals also involve the U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service which was charged with deter- <br />mination of impacts to endangered species <br />(Colorado squawfish). Approval from the <br />endangered species branch of the Colorado <br />Division of Wildlife was also a requirement. <br />Liaison with designated representatives of <br />each governmental agency was initiated early <br />in the project. Agency representatives were <br />encouraged to' be present throughout the <br />field studies and were gathered in several <br />formal meetings to verify unified approval <br />of the entire railroad design including the <br />backwaters. This procedure resulted in <br />minimal friction and misunderstandings <br />between all parties concerned, and it often <br />provided ideas and insights for avoiding <br />future problems which have plagued other <br />mine and/or railroad construction projects. <br /> <br />In spite of careful planning some <br />problems arose during construction of the <br />backwaters. Projected loc~tions of fill for <br />the porous dams did not contain suitable <br />size material after excavation, and the <br />required size fill had to be transported <br />from alternate locations of railroad cuts. <br />In addition, fill size was not as uniform as <br />desired, and it is expected that proper dam <br />operation will not occur until the descend- <br />ing limb of. the hydrograph. Unusually <br />severe winter weather neces.sitated placing <br />fill for one of the dams on ice. In <br />addition, much of the fill was frozen into <br />blocks. The result was that one dam was too <br />porous when water first began to flow <br /> <br />through it. This situation is expected to <br />remedy itself by natural sediment deposition <br />during th~ first year following construction <br />as high water receeds. Because of lack of <br />adequate rip rap at the dam ends coupled <br />with abnormally high runoff, the upstream <br />dam is rapidly eroding at the offshore end <br />and will probably be breached. This will <br />require repair and possibly the. backwater <br />channel morphology will have to be re- <br />adjusted to regain the design shape and <br />thalweg elevation. <br /> <br />Actual squawfish rearing is expected to <br />be conducted by the Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife. Because it was expected that <br />backwater morphology would not be completely <br />stable during the first year of existence, a <br />decision was made early on to wait until the <br />second year of backwater existence (19~ <br />water year) before attempting squawfisEP <br />rearing experiments. In. view of the con- <br />struction difficulties and abnormally high <br /> <br />spring flows during 1979, this appea rs to <br />have been a wise decision. <br /> <br />Once the porous dams have been properly <br />stabilized and repaired (during 1979 low <br />water), rearing experiments can begin. <br />Because of the amicable relationship estab- <br />lished between the coal company and govern- <br />ment agencies and maintained throughout the <br />period of construction, it is anticipated that <br />a series of fruitful squawfish rearing <br />experiments will result which would not have <br />occurred had the rail spur not been <br />constructed. <br /> <br />555 <br />