Laserfiche WebLink
82 J. FISH. RES. BOARD CAN., VOL. 33(1), 1976 <br />Ta,eLE 2. Percentage of thrombocytes, lymphocytes, and heterophils in the blood. <br /> Hours <br /> after Thrombocytes (~) Lymphocytes (~) Heterophils (~) <br /> treat- <br />Treatment ment N ?C se N X se N X se <br />Control 0 9 1.7 0.5 9 89.2 2.l 9 9.1 2.0 <br />Shocked 0 7 4.0 1.8 7 88.1 2.6 7 7.9 2.4 <br />Shocked l 6 0.5 0.3 6 93.7 1.1 6 5.8 2.9 <br />Shocked 3 7 0.7 0.3 7 93.0 2.4 7 6.3 2.1 <br />Shocked 6 8 0.1 0.1 R 95.6 0.7 8 4.3 0.8 <br />Control 6 12 0.8 0.2 12 92.6 0.9 12 6.6 0.9 <br />W ~~ r <br />~ ~ ~~ <br />J <br />a 200 r A` <br />4 ~ ``~ <br />~ 'b ,~--~_ ,o <br />N IOOr~---~-~_ _ <br />`n GI ~, _ <br />w _ <br />J <br />j i5 5~ EC IS $EC <br />m zoo - <br />Y <br />r ~°- <br />O o ',1 _ <br />V7 Q _ ~ _ 4'~ <br />a ItI <br />1.~L11_L1.11,1..LLL1_ 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I J <br />O IO 20 90 60 90 120 150 <br />tas sEC. O 1020 40 60 90 120 150 <br />TIME (MINI <br />Ftc. 4. Buccal pressure expressed as percentage of <br />preshock levels in two trout (open circles, solid line; <br />triangles, and dashed line) shocked twice for 15 s <br />each time (upper panel); and (lower panel) one <br />trout (triangles, dashed line) shocked for 45 s. In <br />both panels the clots and broken line represent un- <br />shocked fish. The curves are interrupted at the time <br />of shocking because data were not collected during <br />periods of electrode activation (arrows) for the <br />treated fish. <br />Discussion <br />It is evident that capturing trout by electro- <br />shock elicits a general stress response lasting <br />several hours. Handling alone has been shown to <br />be a stressor in fishes (Donaldson and McBride <br />1967; Wedemeyer 1969, 1972; Stevens 1972). <br />That hematocrit value did not reflect the change <br />in erythrocytes noted by Bouck and Ball (1966) <br />and Kraiukhin and Smirnova (1966) is perhaps <br />attributable to the small numbers of samples for <br />this determination. Androgen levels were not <br />markedly affected by shocking, but reproductive <br />success of populations might be influenced if eggs <br />or fry were shocked (Godfrey 1957; and Marriott <br />1973). <br />There appears to be a close parallel between <br />the stress induced by electroshock and that in- <br />deed by hypoxia and/or severe muscular activity. <br />"The responses of the physiological processes <br />examined are most likely dependent on severity <br />and duration of the stressor. The rapid increase <br />in breathing amplitude after electric shock and <br />the return to baseline values after the electric <br />shock follow a pattern similar to that in fish with <br />an oxygen debt and the paying off of that debt <br />as discussed by Heath (1973). Ventilatory and <br />circulatory rates work in concert with amplitude <br />(stroke volume) to supply oxygen to the tissues. <br />Our data do not indicate an effect of electroshock <br />on the rate component of the system. Phis is con- <br />trary to reports on visual counts ]Wade by Hauck <br />(1949), Bodrova and Kraiukhin (1958), Kraiu- <br />khin and Smirnova (1966), and Kynard and Lons- <br />dale (1975). We found in all treatments, how- <br />ever, that the electroshocked fish responded by <br />changing the amplitude but not frequency of <br />breathing. The variability in these factors in fish <br />under various environmental conditions (Spitzer <br />et al, 1969) may account for these differences in <br />response. <br />The rapidity of lactate increase in the shocked <br />fish apparently reflects the severity of the period <br />of anaerobic muscular activity. The recovery of <br />lactic acid levels in the blood was somewhat <br />similar to that noted in rainbow trout after mus- <br />cular exercise (Black et al. 1960) and confirms <br />reports of lactate increase due to shocking (John- <br />son et al. 1956; Caillouet ]967). The degree of <br />oxygen debt incurred during shocking may have <br />been small, however, as indicated by the more <br />than tenfold, but more gradual increase in lactate <br />in cutthroat trout (S. clarki) subjected to severe <br />hypoxia by Heath and Pitchard (1965). Muscular <br />exertion also elicited a steady increase in blood <br />glucose levels for the first 12 h during recovery; <br />resting levels had been regained 12 h later (Black <br />et al. 1960). Asphyxiation can also lead to <br />steadily elevating glucose levels, as shown by <br />Chavin and Young (1970) in goldfish. 1n the <br />