Laserfiche WebLink
78 J. FISH. RES. BOARD CAN., VOL. 33(1), ]976 <br />RESPIRATORY AND CARDIAC ACTIVITY <br />We shocked rainbow trout (168-231 g) in the <br />laboratory for various periods to determine the <br />effects of electroshock on respiratory and cardiac <br />activity. Silver ECG electrodes were implanted, one <br />just anterior and lateral to the heart and another just <br />posterior and on the contralateral side of the heart. <br />A buccal cannula consisting of PE 60 polyethylene <br />tubing was inserted just lateral to the vomer. Buccal <br />pressure as a measure of breathing movement was <br />monitored with a Statham Laboratories pressure <br />transducer (P 23 BB). Breathing and cardiac ac- <br />tivities were recorded on a Grass polygraph. <br />T'he fish were starved for 24 h before surgery and <br />during the experiment. One control fish and two <br />treatment fish were used in each test. The control fish <br />was placed in a wooden box in which the flowing water <br />supply was in parallel with that for the test fish. Test <br />fish were placed into a wooden frame chamber that <br />was covered with transparent netting of nylon mono- <br />filament (Vexar©). The dimensions of the test and <br />control chambers were such that they did not restrict <br />breathing of the fish or movement of the paired fins <br />but prevented swimming in any direction and turning. <br />Two test chambers were suspended at middepth and <br />perpendicular to the long axis of a 2009 cm x 55 cm <br />x 44 cm flowing water trough. The water temperature <br />was 15 C; hardness (CaCO,) was 40 mg/filer, and <br />conductivity was 80 µmho. We covered the trough <br />with a black polyethylene sheet to exclude light, <br />thereby keeping the fish calm. <br />Hooped-shaped electrodes (27 cm diam) were <br />placed at either end of the trough, 1070 cm apart. A <br />Coffelt battery backpack shocker delivering 350 V <br />and 0.6 A DC was employed. <br />The fish were allowed more than 16 h to recover <br />from the surgical implantation of the ECG electrodes <br />and cannulae before they were shocked. During this <br />time we monitored breathing and heart rates to estab- <br />lish baseline conditions. Two trout were shocked for <br />a dur:~tion of 15 s. Breathing and cardiac activity <br />returned to baseline conditions within 150 min. The <br />same trout were then reshocked for I S s, monitored <br />for 150 min, shocked for 60 s, and again monitored <br />for 15 min. Two other test fish were shocked for 45 <br />s. The monitors were disconnected during [he periods <br />when the electrodes were energized. Each fish was <br />checked by necropsy to determine possible gross <br />effects of the electroshock. <br />Breathing and heart rate responses were determined <br />from the polygraphs. Buccal pressure peaks were <br />measured over 1 min intervals at -1, 1, 2, S, lU, 20, <br />40, 60, 90, 12U, and I SU min to contrast the depth of <br />breathing before and after shocking. Data are pre- <br />sented as the average of each sampling times measure- <br />ments. To make data comparable between fish, we <br />considered the preshock amplitude to be 100% and <br />expressed the postshock amplitudes as a percentage of <br />the preshock levels. <br />ISOENZYME PATTERNS <br />To determine the effect of electroshocking on bio- <br />chemical characters, we shocked 20 juvenile rainbow <br />trout (Roaring River stock; average weight 29.3 -!- <br />1.39 g sE) for 40 s with 75 V and 1.1 A DC, delivered <br />by a Coffelt battery backpack shocker. Immediately <br />after shocking and before recovery from the paralysis <br />the fish were removed from their 3700-liter circular <br />tank. Blood was collected from the caudal artery into <br />heparinized microhematocrit tubes, and the liver and <br />a piece of white epaxial muscle were removed. <br />Twenty control fish were collected by dipnet, given a <br />blow to the head and sampled as above. Water condi- <br />tions at Oregon State University's Smith Farm La- <br />boratory where the experiment was carried out were: <br />temperature 11 C, hardness (CaCO;,) 99 mg/liter, pH <br />7.3, and conductivity 241 µmho. <br />We determined electrophoretic patterns of the fol- <br />lowing isoenzyme systems using Ridgway's et al. <br />(1970) buffer system: liver lactate dehydrogenase <br />(LDH), tetrazolium oxidase (TO) and esterase <br />(EST;), white muscle glucosephosphate isomerase <br />(GPI), phosphoglucomutase (PCiM), alpha glycero- <br />phosphate dehydrogenase (AGP), aspartate amino <br />transferase (AA'1'), and general protein (GP), and <br />plasma GP and LDH. White muscle malate dehydro- <br />genase (MDH), malic enzyme (ME), and liver iso- <br />citrate dehydrogenase (1DH) were separated on a <br />buffer system described by Clayton and Tretiak <br />(1972). All systems were stained as suggested by <br />Shaw and Prasad (1970) with some minor modifica- <br />tions. Gels were a 10.4°~o solution (wt/vol) of Elec- <br />trostarch~ and buffer. <br />All data were tested for homogeneity of variance. <br />Those found to be homogenous were analyzed by the <br />standard t-test. Nonhomogeneous data were analyzed <br />by a /I'-test that allows comparison of means with <br />unequal variances (Cochran and Cox 1957). Sig- <br />nificance was determined at « _ .05. <br />Results <br />GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY <br />Because our results did not differ with sex, data <br />from both sexes were pooled, The fish were imma- <br />ture and o1' similar weight and had similar go- <br />nado-somatic indices, averaging 0.97 ~- 0.163% <br />sE for males and 0.428 ± O.U39% sE for females. <br />Therefore, the variation for some physiological <br />ratios, such as androgen concentration with go- <br />nadal development (Schreck et al. 1972b) and <br />corticoid concentration with weight of fish (Singley <br />and Chavin 1975), was not problematic. <br />Fish that were shocked exhibited a significant <br />(one-third) increase in mean plasma glucose <br />levels by 3 h post treatment (Fig. 1). This eleva- <br />tion was still present 6 h after shocking. Variances <br />were homogenous. There was no significant dif- <br />ference between mean plasma glucose levels of <br />control fish sampled at time zero (X = 69.5 <br />mg/ 100 ml) and 6 h later (3C = 66.0 mg/ 100 <br />ml). <br />