Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />THREATENED & ENDANGERED FISHES <br /> <br />Table 3."Summary statistics for Apache trout rearing program, 1964-81; <br /> <br /> Percent Percenttolal <br /> No. of A nrage, Pick pick Stocked and/or stocked and/or <br />Ynr females Eggs eggs/female off off retained retained <br />1964 5 370 >2 130 36.1 99 27.5 <br />1965 17 J,853 109 1,120 60.2 742 39.8 <br />1966 60 11,034 183.9 8,897 83.7 <br />1967 104 25,615 246.3 20,979 81.8 4,645 18.12 <br />. 1968:f~ 229 45,342 198 35.873 79.0 5,674 12.5 <br />1969 .,' ,~" )75 I 75,513 431.5 52,673 69.0 16,162 21.39 <br />1970 ;'d 146,491 106,040 72.0 18,250 12.45 <br />1971 136,616 97,390 71.28 19,113 13.99 <br />1972.1 ":',' 84,100 45,592 54.0 14,255 16.95 <br />1973,,; ,',,: '" 93,264 72,895 78.0 7,986 8.56 <br />1974 " NO RECORDS-FISH STOLEN <br />1975,}\ ~ NEW FISH <br />~ ", <br />1976, NO SPAWN <br />19171 5,616 3,531 62.9 1,042 18.55 <br />1978 6,692 2,908 43.0 1,329 19.85 ' <br />1979,r,! <br />1980 5,616 3,531 62.87 100 <br />1981" 149,190 96,973 65.0 2,999 <br /> <br /> <br />\ ~, '4? I '>. <br /> <br /> <br />f <br />ords between 1964 and 1981 indicated that mean <br />number of eggs produced by 2- through 5-year- <br />old females was about 274. <br />An average of 69.7% of eggs do not survive to <br />hatch (Table 3). Of eggs that do hatch, an average <br />of only 38.7% survive to be used for management <br />purposes or brood stock. Total numbers of fish <br />produced over the past 18 years have averaged <br />11.8% of the yearly total egg-take (Table 3). <br />After eggs hatch, sac fry are difficult to train <br />to feed, being reluctantlo accept artificial diets. <br />Success was achieved by starting fry on powdered <br />eggs, then switching to a commercial feed mixed <br />with ground beef liver. <br />Apache trout fry and fingerlings neither exhibit <br />schooling behavior nor form into aggregates like <br />domesticated trout. Young of this species are <br />highly territorial and defend their territories vig- <br />orously. This behavior is not conducive to intensive <br />hatchery cultivation, where high numbers of fish <br />must be raised in a confined area. The result is <br />high fry mortality and survival only of the more <br />aggressive and dominant individuals. <br />At water temperatures of 50.90F, once the fry <br />are on feed, they grow slowly, averaging 2 inches <br />in total length after 150 days. Potential inbreeding <br />is high because the initial brood stock was har- <br />vested from a single population in a small head- <br />water stream. Further, Sterling Springs Hatchery <br />is a small production facility primarily utilized for <br />rearing non-native salmonids for management <br /> <br /> <br />purposes; only two raceways are allocated for <br />Apache trout culture. This situation makes it <br />difficult to keep the various year-classes of brood <br />stock separate or to hold many brood stock.,The <br />lack of space and of annual gamete production <br />increases the probability of back-crosses of brotherl <br />sister, mother/son, and father/<:Iaughter. <br /> <br />Program Assessment <br /> <br />Limited success of the Apache trout culture <br />program is attributed to several factors working <br />singularly or in combination. First, during 18 years, <br />we have not learned how to culture the fish; <br />second, the fish is "wild" and may not be suscep- <br />tible to intensive culturing. Problems associated <br />with culturing Apache trout can be"grouPfd into <br />three categories: physiological, beha~ioral, and <br />propagation methods. Low fecundity rates and <br />slow growth rates may be physiological adaptations <br />for survival in small, harsh, headwater streams. <br />Further, reluctance of fry to accept an artificial. , <br />diet, coupled with their territorial defenstf, may <br />be a behavioral response associated with a highly <br />competitive and limited natural system. Poor egg <br />survival may be related to ~pawning and egg <br />handling methods that work well on domesticated <br />non-native salmonid strains but not with Apache <br />trout. <br />Hybridization with introduced rainbow trout <br />stock has been suggested as the reason for the <br />decline of Apache trout (Miller 1972, Behnke <br /> <br />