<br />
<br />
<br />THREATENED & ENDANGERED FISHES
<br />
<br />Table 3."Summary statistics for Apache trout rearing program, 1964-81;
<br />
<br /> Percent Percenttolal
<br /> No. of A nrage, Pick pick Stocked and/or stocked and/or
<br />Ynr females Eggs eggs/female off off retained retained
<br />1964 5 370 >2 130 36.1 99 27.5
<br />1965 17 J,853 109 1,120 60.2 742 39.8
<br />1966 60 11,034 183.9 8,897 83.7
<br />1967 104 25,615 246.3 20,979 81.8 4,645 18.12
<br />. 1968:f~ 229 45,342 198 35.873 79.0 5,674 12.5
<br />1969 .,' ,~" )75 I 75,513 431.5 52,673 69.0 16,162 21.39
<br />1970 ;'d 146,491 106,040 72.0 18,250 12.45
<br />1971 136,616 97,390 71.28 19,113 13.99
<br />1972.1 ":',' 84,100 45,592 54.0 14,255 16.95
<br />1973,,; ,',,: '" 93,264 72,895 78.0 7,986 8.56
<br />1974 " NO RECORDS-FISH STOLEN
<br />1975,}\ ~ NEW FISH
<br />~ ",
<br />1976, NO SPAWN
<br />19171 5,616 3,531 62.9 1,042 18.55
<br />1978 6,692 2,908 43.0 1,329 19.85 '
<br />1979,r,!
<br />1980 5,616 3,531 62.87 100
<br />1981" 149,190 96,973 65.0 2,999
<br />
<br />
<br />\ ~, '4? I '>.
<br />
<br />
<br />f
<br />ords between 1964 and 1981 indicated that mean
<br />number of eggs produced by 2- through 5-year-
<br />old females was about 274.
<br />An average of 69.7% of eggs do not survive to
<br />hatch (Table 3). Of eggs that do hatch, an average
<br />of only 38.7% survive to be used for management
<br />purposes or brood stock. Total numbers of fish
<br />produced over the past 18 years have averaged
<br />11.8% of the yearly total egg-take (Table 3).
<br />After eggs hatch, sac fry are difficult to train
<br />to feed, being reluctantlo accept artificial diets.
<br />Success was achieved by starting fry on powdered
<br />eggs, then switching to a commercial feed mixed
<br />with ground beef liver.
<br />Apache trout fry and fingerlings neither exhibit
<br />schooling behavior nor form into aggregates like
<br />domesticated trout. Young of this species are
<br />highly territorial and defend their territories vig-
<br />orously. This behavior is not conducive to intensive
<br />hatchery cultivation, where high numbers of fish
<br />must be raised in a confined area. The result is
<br />high fry mortality and survival only of the more
<br />aggressive and dominant individuals.
<br />At water temperatures of 50.90F, once the fry
<br />are on feed, they grow slowly, averaging 2 inches
<br />in total length after 150 days. Potential inbreeding
<br />is high because the initial brood stock was har-
<br />vested from a single population in a small head-
<br />water stream. Further, Sterling Springs Hatchery
<br />is a small production facility primarily utilized for
<br />rearing non-native salmonids for management
<br />
<br />
<br />purposes; only two raceways are allocated for
<br />Apache trout culture. This situation makes it
<br />difficult to keep the various year-classes of brood
<br />stock separate or to hold many brood stock.,The
<br />lack of space and of annual gamete production
<br />increases the probability of back-crosses of brotherl
<br />sister, mother/son, and father/<:Iaughter.
<br />
<br />Program Assessment
<br />
<br />Limited success of the Apache trout culture
<br />program is attributed to several factors working
<br />singularly or in combination. First, during 18 years,
<br />we have not learned how to culture the fish;
<br />second, the fish is "wild" and may not be suscep-
<br />tible to intensive culturing. Problems associated
<br />with culturing Apache trout can be"grouPfd into
<br />three categories: physiological, beha~ioral, and
<br />propagation methods. Low fecundity rates and
<br />slow growth rates may be physiological adaptations
<br />for survival in small, harsh, headwater streams.
<br />Further, reluctance of fry to accept an artificial. ,
<br />diet, coupled with their territorial defenstf, may
<br />be a behavioral response associated with a highly
<br />competitive and limited natural system. Poor egg
<br />survival may be related to ~pawning and egg
<br />handling methods that work well on domesticated
<br />non-native salmonid strains but not with Apache
<br />trout.
<br />Hybridization with introduced rainbow trout
<br />stock has been suggested as the reason for the
<br />decline of Apache trout (Miller 1972, Behnke
<br />
<br />
|