Laserfiche WebLink
1736 D. B. OSMUNDSON ET AL. Ecological Applications <br />Vol. 12, No. 6 <br />framework is set in motion, the bed becomes a source <br />of suspended sediment as fines are winnowed out. How <br />much fine sediment accumulates in the bed is a function <br />of sediment load, local velocity, and the period of time <br />separating bed-mobilizing events. <br />Flows of sufficient magnitude to fully mobilize the <br />bed now occur at a lower frequency than during historic <br />times, largely due to river regulation. The result has <br />been a lengthening of time between such events (Fig. <br />7). For strata 6-11, estimates of historic recurrence <br />intervals averaged 1.2-2.7 yr, depending on the stra- <br />tum. Our monitoring results of DFS in strata 8 and 9 <br />indicate that sediment begins to accumulate in the bed <br />within the first year following a flushing event and DFS <br />continues to decline through at least the first four years <br />if flows do not exceed the threshold for widespread bed <br />mobilization. Flows reaching or exceeding the thresh- <br />old for initial'motion were ineffective at reversing de- <br />clines in DFS. In the 34 yr since most water devel- <br />opment projects were completed, mean duration sep- <br />arating flushing events doubled in strata 9-11, tripled <br />in stratum 8 and increased fivefold in strata 6 and 7. <br />From 1957 to 1983, strata 6 and 7 underwent a 26-yr <br />period without a widespread mobilizing event. Simi- <br />larly, stratum 8 lacked such flows during 1965-1978 <br />(14 yr). Historically, the longest interval for strata 6- <br />11 was 3 yr. Given the link between benthic biomass <br />and fine sediment indicated here, we infer that in recent <br />times these strata- underwent artificially extended pe- <br />riods of lowered productivity with a corresponding <br />negative effect on resident fish populations. This, cou- <br />pled with range reduction and increases in nonnative <br />fish of limited forage value, have almost certainly re- <br />duced the capacity of the upper Colorado River to sup- <br />port adult Colorado pikeminnow. <br />Management implications <br />Spatial distribution of the community's primary pis- <br />civore was related to the relative abundance of potential <br />prey fish. Our results also indicated that total surface <br />area of the river and the availability of non-riffle/run <br />mesohabitats (pools, eddies, backwaters, etc.) posi- <br />tively influenced adult pikeminnow densities in com- <br />bination with food availability. Relationships with food <br />availability were stronger than with habitat area alone. <br />Hence, traditional instream flow methodologies that <br />strive to increase standing stocks of target species by <br />emphasizing the importance of preferred physical hab- <br />itat and the manipulation of base flows may be met <br />with limited success in the upper Colorado River and <br />perhaps in other similarly regulated rivers. Such efforts <br />may prove beneficial, however, if coupled with man- <br />agement actions designed to enhance food availability. <br />Our work provides a first step towards understanding <br />how changes in flow regime in the upper Colorado <br />River might affect the foodweb supporting the main- <br />channel fish community. <br />To increase standing crops of primary producers and <br />consumers, strategies aimed at restoring the frequency <br />of flushing events should be explored. Runs were the <br />most pervasive habitat type in the river and the most <br />in need of more frequent flushing of fine sediment. <br />Riffles were relatively clean during our longitudinal <br />study regardless of location; however, the 1994-1995 <br />sampling may have represented a particularly "clean" <br />period: discharges adequate to fully mobilize the bed <br />occurred during 1993, a year preceding the start of our <br />study, and again during 1995, just prior to our last <br />sampling effort. Results of the 6-yr DFS monitoring in <br />strata 8 and 9 showed that riffles, though generally <br />more free of fine sediment than runs, can nonetheless <br />accrue fines over time. In all strata, riffles made up a <br />small percentage of the overall total area. Riffles were <br />especially rare in downstream strata 1-5; there they <br />apparently act as localized centers of bioproduction <br />amid a channel dominated by unproductive runs. <br />It is difficult to surmise the degree to which the lon- <br />gitudinal distributions of fine sediment documented <br />here deviate from the historical norm and the degree <br />to which management efforts might be successful in <br />enhancing conditions in some strata. Indeed, the period <br />of our longitudinal study may have coincided with a <br />relatively clean period, representing substrate condi- <br />tions difficult to improve upon. Thus, benthic inver- <br />tebrates, with their quick recovery time, might have <br />been at near-optimum levels; however, fish populations, <br />due to lag effects, may have required more time to <br />respond to improved conditions. Hence, our fish abun- <br />dance results may have reflected antecedent or long- <br />term average conditions. Clearly, the main objective of <br />providing flows that flush fines from the bed is to make <br />runs more biologically productive more of the time. <br />Bankfull flushing flows serve other purposes bene- <br />ficial to Colorado pikeminnow and to the native fish <br />community in general. Such flows are often channel- <br />forming flows that scour encroaching vegetation and <br />maintain side channels (Van Steeter and Pitlick 1998), <br />improve substrate conditions for spawning and repro- <br />ductive success, entrain organic debris and perhaps <br />negatively affect small non-native fish abundance <br />(Stanford 1994, McAda and Ryel 1999). Complex river <br />segments created by lateral channel movement in un- <br />confined reaches produce mesofeatures of the channel <br />such as riffles, and midchannel or shoreline bars, there- <br />by providing a mosaic of productive littoral zones <br />(Thorp 1992) juxtaposed with other mesohabitats <br />(pools, eddies, and backwaters) preferred by Colorado <br />pikeminnow and other native fish (Osmundson et al. <br />1995). Although the base-flow stage can be manipu- <br />lated to maximize preferred mesohabitats and habitat <br />heterogeneity, periodic flood flows are required to cre- <br />ate or maintain the channel features that give rise to <br />these base-flow habitats. These effects are important <br />functions of the natural flow regime in the upper Col- <br />orado River. Restoring the frequency of bankfull events <br />to near historical levels may, yet be possible through