|
1736 D. B. OSMUNDSON ET AL. Ecological Applications
<br />Vol. 12, No. 6
<br />framework is set in motion, the bed becomes a source
<br />of suspended sediment as fines are winnowed out. How
<br />much fine sediment accumulates in the bed is a function
<br />of sediment load, local velocity, and the period of time
<br />separating bed-mobilizing events.
<br />Flows of sufficient magnitude to fully mobilize the
<br />bed now occur at a lower frequency than during historic
<br />times, largely due to river regulation. The result has
<br />been a lengthening of time between such events (Fig.
<br />7). For strata 6-11, estimates of historic recurrence
<br />intervals averaged 1.2-2.7 yr, depending on the stra-
<br />tum. Our monitoring results of DFS in strata 8 and 9
<br />indicate that sediment begins to accumulate in the bed
<br />within the first year following a flushing event and DFS
<br />continues to decline through at least the first four years
<br />if flows do not exceed the threshold for widespread bed
<br />mobilization. Flows reaching or exceeding the thresh-
<br />old for initial'motion were ineffective at reversing de-
<br />clines in DFS. In the 34 yr since most water devel-
<br />opment projects were completed, mean duration sep-
<br />arating flushing events doubled in strata 9-11, tripled
<br />in stratum 8 and increased fivefold in strata 6 and 7.
<br />From 1957 to 1983, strata 6 and 7 underwent a 26-yr
<br />period without a widespread mobilizing event. Simi-
<br />larly, stratum 8 lacked such flows during 1965-1978
<br />(14 yr). Historically, the longest interval for strata 6-
<br />11 was 3 yr. Given the link between benthic biomass
<br />and fine sediment indicated here, we infer that in recent
<br />times these strata- underwent artificially extended pe-
<br />riods of lowered productivity with a corresponding
<br />negative effect on resident fish populations. This, cou-
<br />pled with range reduction and increases in nonnative
<br />fish of limited forage value, have almost certainly re-
<br />duced the capacity of the upper Colorado River to sup-
<br />port adult Colorado pikeminnow.
<br />Management implications
<br />Spatial distribution of the community's primary pis-
<br />civore was related to the relative abundance of potential
<br />prey fish. Our results also indicated that total surface
<br />area of the river and the availability of non-riffle/run
<br />mesohabitats (pools, eddies, backwaters, etc.) posi-
<br />tively influenced adult pikeminnow densities in com-
<br />bination with food availability. Relationships with food
<br />availability were stronger than with habitat area alone.
<br />Hence, traditional instream flow methodologies that
<br />strive to increase standing stocks of target species by
<br />emphasizing the importance of preferred physical hab-
<br />itat and the manipulation of base flows may be met
<br />with limited success in the upper Colorado River and
<br />perhaps in other similarly regulated rivers. Such efforts
<br />may prove beneficial, however, if coupled with man-
<br />agement actions designed to enhance food availability.
<br />Our work provides a first step towards understanding
<br />how changes in flow regime in the upper Colorado
<br />River might affect the foodweb supporting the main-
<br />channel fish community.
<br />To increase standing crops of primary producers and
<br />consumers, strategies aimed at restoring the frequency
<br />of flushing events should be explored. Runs were the
<br />most pervasive habitat type in the river and the most
<br />in need of more frequent flushing of fine sediment.
<br />Riffles were relatively clean during our longitudinal
<br />study regardless of location; however, the 1994-1995
<br />sampling may have represented a particularly "clean"
<br />period: discharges adequate to fully mobilize the bed
<br />occurred during 1993, a year preceding the start of our
<br />study, and again during 1995, just prior to our last
<br />sampling effort. Results of the 6-yr DFS monitoring in
<br />strata 8 and 9 showed that riffles, though generally
<br />more free of fine sediment than runs, can nonetheless
<br />accrue fines over time. In all strata, riffles made up a
<br />small percentage of the overall total area. Riffles were
<br />especially rare in downstream strata 1-5; there they
<br />apparently act as localized centers of bioproduction
<br />amid a channel dominated by unproductive runs.
<br />It is difficult to surmise the degree to which the lon-
<br />gitudinal distributions of fine sediment documented
<br />here deviate from the historical norm and the degree
<br />to which management efforts might be successful in
<br />enhancing conditions in some strata. Indeed, the period
<br />of our longitudinal study may have coincided with a
<br />relatively clean period, representing substrate condi-
<br />tions difficult to improve upon. Thus, benthic inver-
<br />tebrates, with their quick recovery time, might have
<br />been at near-optimum levels; however, fish populations,
<br />due to lag effects, may have required more time to
<br />respond to improved conditions. Hence, our fish abun-
<br />dance results may have reflected antecedent or long-
<br />term average conditions. Clearly, the main objective of
<br />providing flows that flush fines from the bed is to make
<br />runs more biologically productive more of the time.
<br />Bankfull flushing flows serve other purposes bene-
<br />ficial to Colorado pikeminnow and to the native fish
<br />community in general. Such flows are often channel-
<br />forming flows that scour encroaching vegetation and
<br />maintain side channels (Van Steeter and Pitlick 1998),
<br />improve substrate conditions for spawning and repro-
<br />ductive success, entrain organic debris and perhaps
<br />negatively affect small non-native fish abundance
<br />(Stanford 1994, McAda and Ryel 1999). Complex river
<br />segments created by lateral channel movement in un-
<br />confined reaches produce mesofeatures of the channel
<br />such as riffles, and midchannel or shoreline bars, there-
<br />by providing a mosaic of productive littoral zones
<br />(Thorp 1992) juxtaposed with other mesohabitats
<br />(pools, eddies, and backwaters) preferred by Colorado
<br />pikeminnow and other native fish (Osmundson et al.
<br />1995). Although the base-flow stage can be manipu-
<br />lated to maximize preferred mesohabitats and habitat
<br />heterogeneity, periodic flood flows are required to cre-
<br />ate or maintain the channel features that give rise to
<br />these base-flow habitats. These effects are important
<br />functions of the natural flow regime in the upper Col-
<br />orado River. Restoring the frequency of bankfull events
<br />to near historical levels may, yet be possible through
|