Laserfiche WebLink
1734 D. B. OSMUNDSON ET AL. Ecological Applications <br />Vol. 12, No. 6 <br />30 <br />25 <br />Z 20 <br />N <br />c <br />N 15 <br />U <br />c <br />m <br />10 <br />U <br />N <br />W <br />Stratum <br />Fto. 8. Mean recurrence intervals (bars) of discharges <br />necessary to produce widespread streambed mobilization in <br />strata 6-11 during recent (1966-2000) and preregulation <br />(1908-1942) periods. Lines above bars indicate the maximum <br />recurrence intervals. <br />downstream decline of biomass in riffles, even though <br />fine sediment in riffles was fairly consistent, suggests <br />involvement of additional factors. Also, the highly sig- <br />nificant multiple regressions of chlorophyll a and in- <br />vertebrates with both PC score and river kilometer in- <br />dicated that both cleanness of the bed and factors as- <br />sociated with longitudinal location were important. <br />Possible factors varying longitudinally include water <br />clarity, water velocity, nutrients, water quality, water <br />temperature, and detritus. Our measurements of tur- <br />bidity, although very limited, suggested a downstream <br />decrease in light penetration which could affect pri- <br />mary productivity. Although not measured, mean water <br />velocity may decline downstream due to the general <br />attenuation of gradient. If so, surficial sediment de- <br />position, expected to be more prevalent in areas with <br />low base-flow velocities might explain the weak cor- <br />relation found between water velocity and chlorophyll <br />a and invertebrate biomass. Concentrations of nitrogen <br />and phosphorus tended to increase downstream, and <br />there was no correspondence between higher nutrient <br />concentration and higher biomass. Lower nutrients in <br />the upper river may have reflected greater uptake in <br />the more productive strata. Although oxygen was not <br />monitored, bed samples provided no indication of an- <br />aerobic conditions. Contaminate concentrations were <br />not evaluated, but we would expect levels to be highest <br />in upstream strata where urban and agricultural areas <br />border the river (elevated selenium levels have been <br />reported in off-channel habitats within strata 8 and 9 <br />[Osmundson et al. 2000]). Water temperatures increase <br />with distance downstream (Osmundson et al. 1998), <br />but did not reach levels that would inhibit primary or <br />secondary production. Detritus declined downstream <br />and the weak correlation with invertebrate biomass <br />suggests a possible food linkage, but does not explain <br />higher standing crops of periphyton. The downstream <br />decline of detritus probably resulted from correspond- <br />ing periphyton declines (an instream source) and the <br />distance from upstream terrestrial sources (i.e., from <br />alluvial reaches where riparian zones were most ex- <br />tensive). While difficult to ascertain from this study, it <br />appears that water clarity, water velocity, and detritus <br />were factors that declined downstream and may have, <br />in addition to bed sediment effects, influenced standing <br />crops of primary producers and invertebrate consum- <br />ers. <br />Riffles were more productive than runs primarily be- <br />cause riffle substrates generally contained less fine sed- <br />iment than adjacent run substrates. In addition, riffles <br />generally had higher velocities and contained more de- <br />tritus than runs, variables that were weakly correlated <br />with chlorophyll a and invertebrate biomass. Detritus, <br />a food for many invertebrates, may have been signif- <br />icantly higher in riffles because of more periphyton <br />biomass and better detritus-collecting properties of <br />"clean" substrate. Also, increased velocities in riffles <br />may have benefited suspension feeders by increasing <br />encounter rates with drifting detritus. <br />The downstream decrease in surface area of riffles <br />likely contributed to downstream declines in fish bio- <br />mass. Runs were found to be increasingly less pro- <br />ductive than riffles downstream, increasing the impor- <br />tance of riffles in supporting stratum-wide fish num- <br />bers, yet the surface area of riffles decreased down- <br />stream as run area increased. Hence, downstream fish <br />not only had less total periphyton and invertebrate bio- <br />mass available per unit area, but also less total area of <br />the more productive habitat type. <br />Factors related to the longitudinal patterns of biota <br />in the upper Colorado River were generally consistent <br />with observations reported by various stream investi- <br />gators. Increased sedimentation has been shown to re- <br />duce insect diversity, density, and species richness in <br />streams (Chutter 1969, Bjornn et al. 1977, Lenat et al. <br />1981). Lab studies have demonstrated macroinverte- <br />brate preference for substrates with unembedded cob- <br />ble over those with half-embedded cobble; and cobble <br />completely embedded in sand is unacceptable to most <br />species (Brusven and Prather 1974). Factors underlying <br />these relationships are fairly well established: rock-sur- <br />faces provide attachment sites for periphyton; algal fil- <br />aments in turn provide food and effective microenvi- <br />ronments for some invertebrate species (Brusven and <br />Prather 1974); crevices among coarse substrate parti- <br />cles shelter invertebrates and collect detritus (Rabeni <br />and Minshall 1977). Schlosser (1982) reported a pos- <br />itive influence of increased algal and invertebrate pro- <br />duction on growth, reproductive success, and recruit- <br />ment of stream-dwelling fish. Berkman and Rabeni <br />(1987) found that feeding guilds of stream fishes most <br />1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11