|
1728 D. B. OSMUNDSON ET AL. Ecological Applications
<br />Vol. 12, No. 6
<br />TABLE 3. Factor loadings for the first factor from principal-
<br />components analysis using several attributes of the stream-
<br />bed.
<br />Attribute Loading
<br />Substrate <2 mm -0.835
<br />Dso 0.857
<br />Void volume 0.818
<br />% Embedded -0.832
<br />Total DFS 0.876
<br />Midcolumn velocity 0.465
<br />Detritus 0.500
<br />Notes: All data were loge transformed for analysis. Attri-
<br />butes, in order, are percentage of substrate particles <2 mm,
<br />median particle size of the surface layer (Dw), volume of
<br />interstitial void space, percentage of the surface area con-
<br />sisting of fines (% Embedded), absolute depth of free space
<br />(DFS), midcolumn water velocity, and detritus dry mass.
<br />indicating low amounts of fine sediment and lower
<br />scores indicating higher amounts. The size of the load-
<br />ing coefficients reinforce the strength of the interre-
<br />lationships among these physical parameters.
<br />Water-quality parameters.-Nutrient analyses indi-
<br />cated high variability among samples, but NO,, NO,,
<br />total inorganic N, total N, and total P increased sig-
<br />nificantly (ANCOVA, P < 0.00001 for all) with dis-
<br />tance downstream (not, shown). NH3 and orthophos-
<br />phorus did not display significant increases down-
<br />stream (ANCOVA, P > 0.15), but strata 10 and 11 had
<br />among the lowest concentrations. General observations
<br />during the study period indicated turbidity was highly
<br />variable over time. Our data, representing only a few
<br />snapshots in time, are therefore not particularly instruc-
<br />tive. From the three days in which it was measured,
<br />the mean significantly increased with distance down-
<br />stream (ANCOVA, F,,64 = 19.60, P = 0.00004), but
<br />strongly displayed this pattern only during the spring
<br />1995 survey.
<br />Biological parameters.-Chlorophyll a, our index of
<br />active periphyton biomass, declined downstream. This
<br />decline was significant in riffles (ANCOVA, F1,s91 =
<br />136.8, P < 0.00001) and runs (ANCOVA, F1.423 =
<br />133.3,P < 0.00001), with the decline in runs especially
<br />pronounced (Fig. 3a). Although chlorophyll a was
<br />greater in riffles than in runs (ANOVA, F,,701 = 68.34,
<br />P < 0.00001), differences occurred only downstream
<br />of stratum 9. In strata 9-11, chlorophyll a was essen-
<br />tially the same in runs and riffles. Invertebrate biomass
<br />also declined downstream in both riffles (ANCOVA,
<br />F,,391 = 201.5, P < 0.00001) and runs (ANCOVA,
<br />F,,186 = 337.5, P < 0,00001) and was also higher in
<br />riffles than in runs (ANOVA, F1,726 = 269.0, P <
<br />0.00001). However, unlike chlorophyll a, invertebrate
<br />biomass was much higher in riffles than in runs of strata
<br />9-11 (Fig. 3b). Detritus showed a less precipitous de-
<br />cline with distance downstream (Fig. 3c), but the de-
<br />clines were still significant for riffles (ANCOVA, F,, 391
<br />= 69.57, P < 0.00001) and runs (ANCOVA, F1,as6 =
<br />57.05, P < 0.00001). Riffle substrates generally con-
<br />tained a greater biomass of detritus than did run sub-
<br />strates (ANOVA, F,,711 = 126.9, P < 0.00001).
<br />Catch rates of all fish declined with distance down-
<br />stream when expressed as either number caught (Fig.
<br />3d; ANCOVA, Fl, 196 = 191.2, P < 0.00001) or as
<br />biomass caught (not shown) (ANCOVA, F,, 196 = 147.9,
<br />P < 0.00001). Subsets of the total catch rate (numbers
<br />caught), presumably more relevant to pikeminnow food
<br />availability, displayed similar trends: the catch rate of
<br />forage-sized (100-300 mm) individuals (excluding
<br />spined species) declined downstream (ANCOVA, F,, 196
<br />= 74.88, P < 0.00001); catch rates of the three dom-
<br />inate soft-rayed, fusiform, native fish species: roundtail
<br />chub (Fig. 3d), flannelmouth suckers (Fig. 3e), and
<br />bluehead suckers (Fig. 3f) also declined downstream
<br />(ANCOVA, all 17,,391 > 60.0, P < 0.00001). For all
<br />species (all sizes), catch rates were highest in strata 7-
<br />9 and 11; for forage-sized fish, catch rates were similar
<br />among strata 7-11 (Fig. 3d). For total fish, native fish,
<br />and forage-sized fish, catch rates were consistently
<br />much lower downstream of stratum 7.
<br />Catch rates of all sizes of the two dominant native
<br />fish species, flannelmouth sucker and particularly blue-
<br />head sucker, were "significantly higher in riffles than in
<br />runs on a river-wide basis (Fig. 3e and f ). For bluehead
<br />sucker in strata 10 and 11, catch rates in the two habitat
<br />types were nearly identical, but rates were significantly
<br />higher in riffles than in runs in strata 5-9 (P < 0.05).
<br />Although bluehead suckers made up a majority of for-
<br />age-sized fish in downstream strata 2-6, very few were
<br />captured from run habitats. On a river-wide basis, catch
<br />rates of bluehead sucker from riffles were higher than
<br />from runs (ANOVA, F1,363 = 84.09, P < 0.00001).
<br />Flannel-mouth suckers were similarly distributed, with
<br />greater catch rates from riffles than from runs (ANO-
<br />VA, F1.311 = 20.25, P < 0.00001); however, no within-
<br />stratum differences were significant (P > 0.05). For
<br />roundtail chub, catch rates in the two habitat types were
<br />similar (ANOVA, 171, 113 = 1.39, P = 0.24), and only
<br />a few fish were found downstream of stratum 7 (Fig.
<br />3d).
<br />Relative body condition (K) of both sucker species
<br />and roundtail chub decreased downstream (regression,
<br />for all: N = 405-3203; P < 0.0003), with the lowest
<br />condition exhibited by bluehead sucker in the three
<br />most downstream strata (Fig. 3g).
<br />Densities of adult Colorado pikeminnow ?550 mm
<br />TL also decreased in a downstream direction (Fig. 3h).
<br />Densities were highest in strata 8 and 9, declined ex-
<br />ponentially between strata 8 and 5, and were consis-
<br />tently low in strata 1-5. Because of instream barriers
<br />at the top of stratum 9, pikeminnow did not occur in
<br />strata 10 and 11.
<br />Interrelationships
<br />Physical habitat-periphyton/macroinvertebrate bio-
<br />mass relationship.-Highly significant correlations
<br />were found between both chlorophyll a and inverte-
|