Laserfiche WebLink
1728 D. B. OSMUNDSON ET AL. Ecological Applications <br />Vol. 12, No. 6 <br />TABLE 3. Factor loadings for the first factor from principal- <br />components analysis using several attributes of the stream- <br />bed. <br />Attribute Loading <br />Substrate <2 mm -0.835 <br />Dso 0.857 <br />Void volume 0.818 <br />% Embedded -0.832 <br />Total DFS 0.876 <br />Midcolumn velocity 0.465 <br />Detritus 0.500 <br />Notes: All data were loge transformed for analysis. Attri- <br />butes, in order, are percentage of substrate particles <2 mm, <br />median particle size of the surface layer (Dw), volume of <br />interstitial void space, percentage of the surface area con- <br />sisting of fines (% Embedded), absolute depth of free space <br />(DFS), midcolumn water velocity, and detritus dry mass. <br />indicating low amounts of fine sediment and lower <br />scores indicating higher amounts. The size of the load- <br />ing coefficients reinforce the strength of the interre- <br />lationships among these physical parameters. <br />Water-quality parameters.-Nutrient analyses indi- <br />cated high variability among samples, but NO,, NO,, <br />total inorganic N, total N, and total P increased sig- <br />nificantly (ANCOVA, P < 0.00001 for all) with dis- <br />tance downstream (not, shown). NH3 and orthophos- <br />phorus did not display significant increases down- <br />stream (ANCOVA, P > 0.15), but strata 10 and 11 had <br />among the lowest concentrations. General observations <br />during the study period indicated turbidity was highly <br />variable over time. Our data, representing only a few <br />snapshots in time, are therefore not particularly instruc- <br />tive. From the three days in which it was measured, <br />the mean significantly increased with distance down- <br />stream (ANCOVA, F,,64 = 19.60, P = 0.00004), but <br />strongly displayed this pattern only during the spring <br />1995 survey. <br />Biological parameters.-Chlorophyll a, our index of <br />active periphyton biomass, declined downstream. This <br />decline was significant in riffles (ANCOVA, F1,s91 = <br />136.8, P < 0.00001) and runs (ANCOVA, F1.423 = <br />133.3,P < 0.00001), with the decline in runs especially <br />pronounced (Fig. 3a). Although chlorophyll a was <br />greater in riffles than in runs (ANOVA, F,,701 = 68.34, <br />P < 0.00001), differences occurred only downstream <br />of stratum 9. In strata 9-11, chlorophyll a was essen- <br />tially the same in runs and riffles. Invertebrate biomass <br />also declined downstream in both riffles (ANCOVA, <br />F,,391 = 201.5, P < 0.00001) and runs (ANCOVA, <br />F,,186 = 337.5, P < 0,00001) and was also higher in <br />riffles than in runs (ANOVA, F1,726 = 269.0, P < <br />0.00001). However, unlike chlorophyll a, invertebrate <br />biomass was much higher in riffles than in runs of strata <br />9-11 (Fig. 3b). Detritus showed a less precipitous de- <br />cline with distance downstream (Fig. 3c), but the de- <br />clines were still significant for riffles (ANCOVA, F,, 391 <br />= 69.57, P < 0.00001) and runs (ANCOVA, F1,as6 = <br />57.05, P < 0.00001). Riffle substrates generally con- <br />tained a greater biomass of detritus than did run sub- <br />strates (ANOVA, F,,711 = 126.9, P < 0.00001). <br />Catch rates of all fish declined with distance down- <br />stream when expressed as either number caught (Fig. <br />3d; ANCOVA, Fl, 196 = 191.2, P < 0.00001) or as <br />biomass caught (not shown) (ANCOVA, F,, 196 = 147.9, <br />P < 0.00001). Subsets of the total catch rate (numbers <br />caught), presumably more relevant to pikeminnow food <br />availability, displayed similar trends: the catch rate of <br />forage-sized (100-300 mm) individuals (excluding <br />spined species) declined downstream (ANCOVA, F,, 196 <br />= 74.88, P < 0.00001); catch rates of the three dom- <br />inate soft-rayed, fusiform, native fish species: roundtail <br />chub (Fig. 3d), flannelmouth suckers (Fig. 3e), and <br />bluehead suckers (Fig. 3f) also declined downstream <br />(ANCOVA, all 17,,391 > 60.0, P < 0.00001). For all <br />species (all sizes), catch rates were highest in strata 7- <br />9 and 11; for forage-sized fish, catch rates were similar <br />among strata 7-11 (Fig. 3d). For total fish, native fish, <br />and forage-sized fish, catch rates were consistently <br />much lower downstream of stratum 7. <br />Catch rates of all sizes of the two dominant native <br />fish species, flannelmouth sucker and particularly blue- <br />head sucker, were "significantly higher in riffles than in <br />runs on a river-wide basis (Fig. 3e and f ). For bluehead <br />sucker in strata 10 and 11, catch rates in the two habitat <br />types were nearly identical, but rates were significantly <br />higher in riffles than in runs in strata 5-9 (P < 0.05). <br />Although bluehead suckers made up a majority of for- <br />age-sized fish in downstream strata 2-6, very few were <br />captured from run habitats. On a river-wide basis, catch <br />rates of bluehead sucker from riffles were higher than <br />from runs (ANOVA, F1,363 = 84.09, P < 0.00001). <br />Flannel-mouth suckers were similarly distributed, with <br />greater catch rates from riffles than from runs (ANO- <br />VA, F1.311 = 20.25, P < 0.00001); however, no within- <br />stratum differences were significant (P > 0.05). For <br />roundtail chub, catch rates in the two habitat types were <br />similar (ANOVA, 171, 113 = 1.39, P = 0.24), and only <br />a few fish were found downstream of stratum 7 (Fig. <br />3d). <br />Relative body condition (K) of both sucker species <br />and roundtail chub decreased downstream (regression, <br />for all: N = 405-3203; P < 0.0003), with the lowest <br />condition exhibited by bluehead sucker in the three <br />most downstream strata (Fig. 3g). <br />Densities of adult Colorado pikeminnow ?550 mm <br />TL also decreased in a downstream direction (Fig. 3h). <br />Densities were highest in strata 8 and 9, declined ex- <br />ponentially between strata 8 and 5, and were consis- <br />tently low in strata 1-5. Because of instream barriers <br />at the top of stratum 9, pikeminnow did not occur in <br />strata 10 and 11. <br />Interrelationships <br />Physical habitat-periphyton/macroinvertebrate bio- <br />mass relationship.-Highly significant correlations <br />were found between both chlorophyll a and inverte-