Laserfiche WebLink
<br />964 <br /> <br />OSMUNDSON AND BURNHAM <br /> <br />30 Upper and Middle <br />Subreaches <br /> <br />.1982 N = 46 <br />01991-1992 N=89 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />300-349 400-449 500-549 600-649 700-749 800-849 900-949 <br /> <br />;R 30 <br />e...... <br /> <br />Middle <br />Subreach <br /> <br />.1974-1976 N = 66 <br />01991-1995 N = 175 <br /> <br />>- <br />g 20 <br />Q) <br />::::J <br />0- <br />Q) 10 <br />... <br />U. <br /> <br /> <br />o~ <br />300-349 400-449 500-549 600-649 700-749 800-849 900-949 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />Lower <br />Subreach <br /> <br />.1979 N=33 <br />01991-1994 N = 58 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />o <br />250-299 350-399 450-499 550-599 650-699 750-799 850-899 <br />300-349 400-449 500-549 600-649 700-749 800-849 900-949 <br /> <br />Length-class (mm) <br /> <br />FIGURE 3.-Length distributions of Colorado squawfish <br />captured (N) during recent and earlier surveys. Reaches <br />and years were pooled as shown (see Table 1) to meet <br />sample size objectives (>30 fish per distribution) and to <br />keep sampling gear types consistent among time periods. <br /> <br />subreaches of the upper reach: this was between <br />the distributions of the combined 1974-1976 pe- <br />riod and the combined 1991-1995 period (Figure <br />3, middle panel) in the middle subreach (P = <br />0.00001, K-S test). The proportion of captured fish <br />less than 550 mm was significantly greater (P = <br />0.00001, test of proportions) for 1974-1976 than <br />for recent years, and many of the fish (35%) were <br />less than 450 mm during 1974-1976. The highest <br />proportion of fish less than 450 mm in recent years <br />was 10% in the lower subreach during 1991-l992 <br />(data not shown). Comparisons between distribu- <br />tions in other years (Figure 3, top and bottom pan- <br />els) failed to indicate significant differences (P > <br />0.05, K-S test) between early and recent periods. <br />Comparisons among recent years.-In the upper <br />subreach of the upper reach, fish 600-649 mm <br /> <br /> 30 Upper <br /> 20 Subreach <br />....... <br />~ 10 <br />~ <br />>- <br />u 0 <br />c: <br />Q) <br />:J <br />0- 30 <br />Q) <br />..... <br />LL <br /> 20 <br /> 10 <br /> <br /> <br />I~ <br /> <br />1993-1994 <br /> <br />N=38 <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />250-299 350-399 450-499 550-599 650-699 750-799 850-899 <br />300-349 400-449 500-549 600-649 700-749 800-849 900-949 <br /> <br />Length-class (mm) <br /> <br />FIGURE 4.-Length distributions of Colorado squawfish <br />captured (N) in the upper subreach of the upper reach <br />during 1991-1992 and 1993'-1994. <br /> <br />were the most abundant group during 1991-1992, <br />but a significant change (P = 0.03, K-S test) in <br />size distribution to smaller fish in 1993-1994 oc- <br />curred, and the 550-599-mm size-class became <br />dominant (Figure 4). In addition, the proportion of <br />fish less than 550 mm significantly increased (P <br />= 0.01, test of proportions) between 1991-1992 <br />and 1993-1994, which would be consistent with <br />an influx of young fish from the lower reach. <br />In the middle subreach, differences in size dis- <br />tribution were significant only between 1993-1994 <br />and 1995 (P = 0.02, K-S test): in 1995 there was <br />a smaller proportion of fish less than 500 mm (P <br />= 0.04, test of proportions). Comparisons between <br />individual years also indicated a difference be- <br />tween size distributions in 1994 and 1995 (P = <br />0.04, K-S test): the proportion of fish less than <br />550 mm declined between 1994 and 1995 (P = <br />0.02, test of proportions). <br />In the lower subreach, size distributions did not <br />significantly change (P = 0.80, K-S test) between <br />1991-1992 and 1993-1994. An apparent increase <br />in the proportion of fish captured in the 450-499- <br />mm length-class from 17% (1991-1992) to 28% <br />(1993-1994) was not significant (P = 0.34, test of <br />proportions). <br /> <br />Reproductive Success <br /> <br />Results from seining surveys indicated that <br />1986 and perhaps 1987 were comparatively good <br />years for Colorado squawfish reproduction in the <br />upper reach. No larval or age-O fish were collected <br />from the upper subreach during the 1986-1994 <br /> <br />c, <br />