My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8163
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8163
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:05:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8163
Author
Osmundson, D. B. and K. P. Burnham.
Title
Status and Trends of the Endangered Colorado Squawfish in the Upper Colorado River.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />966 <br /> <br />OSMUNDSON AND BURNHAM <br /> <br />ever, were skewed by the large year-classes that <br />materialized as sub adults in 1991 and dominated <br />the 500-549-mm size-class by 1994. The dynamic <br />nature of these large cohorts made definitive size- <br />frequency comparisons between reaches difficult. <br />However, larger fish were clearly more prevalent <br />in the upper reach: fish longer than 600 mm were <br />rarely caught in the lower reach, but they consti- <br />tuted more than 30% of captures in the upper <br />reach. Osmundson et al. (1997) indicated that <br />length-frequency distributions for adults longer <br />than 550 mm in the upper reach were relatively <br />stable during 1991-1994. <br />Though some reproduction and recruitment may <br />occur every year, strong year-classes are evidently <br />infrequent. The distinct pulse of subadult fish de- <br />tected in the lower reach in 1991 was distributed <br />throughout the river within a few years. This in- <br />fusion of new fish into the population was appar- <br />ently the result of one or more strong year-classes <br />produced during the mid-1980s, a phenomenon <br />corroborated by catch rates of larvae and young <br />of year during those years. Given that high repro- <br />ductive success later resulted in strong recruitment <br />(at least to size-classes up to 550 mm), low num- <br />bers of adult Colorado squawfish in the Colorado <br />River may be a result of insufficient reproductive <br />success during most years. <br />The degree of reproductive success and first- <br />year survival is probably determined by environ- <br />mental conditions that vary yearly rather than by <br />fluctuations in size of the spawning population <br />(i.e., egg output), because apparent increases in <br />adult numbers during the 4 years of this study did <br />not result in concomitant increases in catch rates <br />of larvae or age-O fish during the same time period. <br />Conversely, weak year-classes beginning in 1988 <br />followed the relatively strong year-classes of 1985 <br />through 1987, while the number of adults probably <br />changed little. A significant environmental factor <br />that may affect reproductive success is the mag- <br />nitude of spring flows: McAda and Kaeding <br />(1989), Osmundson and Kaeding (1991), and <br />McAda et al. (1994) found significant positive cor- <br />relations between fall catch rates of age-O Colo- <br />rado squawfish in the Colorado River and the mag- <br />nitude of spring flows that preceded the spawning <br />season. Exceptionally high flows may also be a <br />precursor to successful reproduction because the <br />strong year-classes of 1985-1987 were preceded <br />by extremely high spring flows during 1983-1984. <br /> <br />Demographic Trends <br />Comparisons with historical abundance are dif- <br />ficult because of the paucity of biological studies <br /> <br />or surveys conducted prior to the 1970s. Jordan <br />(1891) conducted surveys in the upper Colorado <br />River basin in 1889 and later described (Jordan <br />and Evermann 1896) abundance and distribution <br />of Colorado squawfish as, "Colorado Basin, very <br />abundant in the river channels as far north as the <br />base of the Rocky Mountains in Colorado (Un- <br />compahgre River at Delta)." Compiled accounts <br />and photographs collected by Quarterone (1993) <br />of Colorado River fish during the first half of this <br />century also indicate much higher abundance of <br />Colorado squaw fish in the upper Colorado River <br />than observed in this study (or studies dating back <br />to the early 1970s). Differences in abundance from <br />these historic accounts and current estimates <br />strongly suggest that the long-term population <br />trend has been downward. <br />Because of the longevity of Colorado squawfish <br />and their pulsed recruitment, the significance of <br />short-term trends in abundance is difficult to eval- <br />uate. Our study coincided with a period when re- <br />cruitment to the adult population was compara- <br />tively high and overall numbers of adults appeared <br />to increase. However, a longer time frame must be <br />considered when evaluating trends of long-lived <br />species, especially one with such a long lag-time <br />between hatching and recruitment to the adult pop- <br />ulation. Although the 1985-1987 year-classes <br />might have recently increased the size of the adult <br />population, reproductive success since 1987 has <br />been relatively low, and the trend of increase in <br />adults could be reversed in the near future. <br />Major trends were not observed in length-fre- <br />quency distributions of adult Colorado squawfish <br />in the upper reach. However, a difference in length <br />frequency of fish longer than 250 mm was ob- <br />served in the middle subreach of the upper reach <br />between the 1974-1976 period and this study (Fig- <br />ure 4), suggesting a decrease in the proportions of <br />juveniles and sub adults in the upper reach during <br />the past 20 years. More than one-third of the fish <br />in this subreach during 1974-1976 were 250-450 <br />mm. The rarity of individuals shorter than 450 mm <br />in the upper reach today, coupled with the stable <br />length distribution of adults greater than 550 mm, <br />suggests that upper-reach recruitment presently <br />comes from the lower reach. In addition, most in- <br />dividuals evidently do not move to the upper reach <br />until they have attained a length of more than 450 <br />mm (Osmundson et al. 1998). Two hypotheses may <br />explain this change in the upper-reach, length-fre- <br />quency distribution: (1) nursery habitat in the up- <br />per reach was formerly of higher quality and quan- <br />tity than in later years, and a smaller proportion <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.