Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i q q ~ Os )iVt tA /1 d SO /1 tWcti t5 IAAri1.h M11 <br /> <br />Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127:957-970, 1998 <br />@ Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1998 <br /> <br />'tIft; ;; <br /> <br />Status and Trends of the Endangered Colorado Squawfish in <br />the Upper Colorado River <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />D. B. OSMUNDSON* <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado River Fishery Project <br />764 Horizon Drive, South Annex A, Grand Junction, Colorado 81503-3946, USA <br /> <br />K. P. BURNHAM <br /> <br />Colorado State University, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit <br />201 Wagar Building, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA <br /> <br />Abstract.-Status of the Colorado River population of the endangered Colorado squawfish Ptych- <br />ocheilus lucius (recently renamed the Colorado pikeminnow) was investigated by (I) estimating <br />adult numbers, (2) evaluating frequency of reproduction and recruitment, (3) identifying trends <br />via changes in size structure over time, and (4) examining historical accounts for clues to former <br />abundance. Adults and subadults were systematically captured from 278 km of river during 1991- <br />1994. Larvae and age-O fish were systematically sampled in two reaches during 1986-1994. <br />Estimated number of adults in the upper 98 km averaged 253 individuals; estimated annual adult <br />survival rate was 0.86. In the lower 181 km, estimates of subadults and adults combined averaged <br />344 individuals. A sizable pulse of subadults 300-400 mm long found in the lower reach in 1991 <br />were from three year-classes, 1985-1987. By 1992, these were distributed throughout the river. <br />Although catch rates of larger adults did not increase significantly in the upper reach during 1991- <br />1994, catch rates of fish less than 550 mm long increased fivefold. Size-frequency analysis of <br />lower-reach fish indicated the 1985-1987 cohorts were the largest produced since before 1977, <br />and no similarly strong year-classes were produced subsequently. Estimated years of origin of <br />these recruiting fish coincided with years of higher-than-average catch rates of larvae and age-O <br />fish in the upper reach and catch rates in subsequent years there were comparatively low. Very <br />few individuals less than 450 mm long were found in the upper reach during the past 15 years, <br />suggesting that recruitment there is from colonization from the lower reach. In contrast, significant <br />numbers of fish less than 400 mm in total length occurred in the upper reach during the mid-1970s. <br />Abundance appears much lower than suggested in historical accounts. Low adult numbers and <br />sporadic pulses of recruitment may make this population vulnerable to extirpation. Though adult <br />survival rate is probably fairly constant, recruitment is highly variable and may represent the most <br />important demographic factor to population persistence. <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish Ptychocheilus lucius (re- <br />cently renamed Colorado pikeminnow; Nelson et <br />al. 1998) were historically distributed throughout <br />warmwater reaches of the Colorado River basin <br />from Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado south to the <br />Gulf of California (Miller 1961). By the 1970s <br />they were extirpated from the Colorado River ba- <br />sin below Glen Canyon Dam (entire lower basin) <br />and from sections of the upper basin as a result of <br />major alterations to the riverine environment <br />(Moyle 1976). Having lost some 80% of its former <br />range, the Colorado squawfish was federally listed <br />as an endangered species in 1967 (U.S. Office of <br />the Federal Register 32:43[1967]:400l). <br />Colorado squawfish are presently restricted to <br />the upper Colorado River basin and inhabit warm- <br />water reaches of the Colorado, Green, and San <br /> <br />* Corresponding author: doug_osmundson@fws.gov <br /> <br />Juan rivers and associated tributaries. The Green <br />River and its two large tributaries (White and Yam- <br />pa rivers) support the largest (Tyus 1991) and per- <br />haps most viable (Gilpin 1993) population, where- <br />as the San Juan River contains the smallest pop- <br />ulation (Platania et al. 1991). A third population <br />persists in the upper Colorado River, but relatively <br />low catch rates of adults and young (Valdez et al. <br />1982; Osmundson and Kaeding 1989; McAda et <br />a1. 1994) suggest this population may have limited <br />viability. Because of the endangered status of this <br />fish, assessing persistence potential of these small- <br />er populations is important in assessing overall <br />species viability. <br />We investigated the status of the upper Colorado <br />River population by assessing current demograph- <br />ics and relating this to past and future demographic <br />trends. Analyses included (1) estimating the size <br />of the adult population, (2) determining the extent <br />or frequency of reproduction and recruitment, (3) <br /> <br />957 <br />