Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />, .' <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />); l~J <br /> <br /> <br />Bonytai 1, humpback and rountai 1 chubs from the Colorado River < <br />system, and the Utah chub from the Bonneville Basin and upper Snake <br />River drainages are used to demonstrate the potential of chromo- <br />some study, or cytogenetics, in fisheries biology. Cytogenetic <br />analysis yields results that are not affectec! by age, so it is, <br />useful for larval and juvenile identification, as well as determina- <br />tion of closely-related and variable species_ All Colorado River <br />species are differentiable from each other on the basis of chromo- <br />some states. Humpback chubs from Black Rocks, Colorado can be <br />distinguished from conspecifics inhabiting the Little Colorado <br />River, Arizona. Utah chubs have a chromosome morphology distin- <br />guishing them from all Colorado River species. The potential uses <br />of cytogenetics are discussed, to include genetic disease analysis, <br />as well as the assessment of pollutants and radiation. Chromosomes <br />can be used for sex determination in certain taxa or in ascertai~ <br />ning genetic affinities. The development of suitable tissue culture <br />techniques allows cytogenetic, as well as electrophoretic, analyses <br />without the sacrifice of animals. <br /> <br />I NT RODUCT ION <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />Fishery biologists need procedures that allow discrimination among <br />groups of fishes. Although external morphology, the familiar counts and mea- <br />surements of Hubbs and Lagler (1964), is most often used to identify fishes, <br />the methodology may fail with larvae and juveniles of related species or with <br />the adults of closely-related variable ones. This identtfication problem has <br />been successfully approached, in some cases, by the direct ex~mination of <br />gene products wi th p rote i n elect rophores is (see A 11 endo rf and Utte r, 1978), <br />where caution should be exercized with the choice of assay proteins (Sarich, <br />1977) or data interpretation (Thorpe, 1982). Another avenue for stock and <br />species problems rema i ns totally unexp 10 i ted. / Eve ry organ i sm is characteri- <br />zable by its chromosomes, or karyotype. Chromosomal features are fixed~' <br />usually being sex, population or species specific, as well as age-independent <br />(Swanson et al.', 1981). Although chromOsome methodology has had' losive <br />deve lopment for tetrapod vertebrates,' such techniques have yet wi ly <br /> <br />