Laserfiche WebLink
243 <br />X. texanus (stocked fish; Minckley et al. 1991). <br />Hump enlargement is already in progress in both <br />species at these sizes, and G. cypha of 300 mm and <br />X. texanus of greater than 200 mm would be <br />approaching immunity from even the largest <br />P. lucius. Populations of G. cypha attain sizes of <br />480 mm in nature and an average adult size of <br />approximately 300 mm TL (Kaeding & Zimmer- <br />man 1983, Karp & Tyus 1990, R. Valdez, unpub- <br />lished). Populations of X. texanus attain an <br />average adult size of about 500 mm TL consisting <br />of adults that range in size from 370 to 740 mm <br />(Minckley 1983, Marsh & Minckley 1989), all of <br />which would be immune from the largest P. Lucius <br />(e.g., 805 mm). <br />Further support for predator-mediated mor- <br />phological change in both of these species is pro- <br />vided by other morphological adaptations linked <br />with predator defense. The lack of, and reduction <br />in size of scales, and the increased relative size of <br />paired fins also are implicated. In G. cypha, scales <br />are absent or greatly reduced in size and number <br />on the dorsal and ventral surfaces. An almost <br />scaleless, and thus, slippery fish can be very diffi- <br />cult for a predator with no jaw teeth to capture <br />and manipulate for effective feeding. Increased <br />maneuverability in more lacustrine-like habitats <br />also would result from laterally flattening bodies, <br />which facilitate complex evasive movements. <br />While these adaptations to predation are consti- <br />tutive in adult G. cypha and X. texanus (i.e., always <br />present), it is possible that these morphologi- <br />cal defense strategies may have been originally <br />predator-induced during pre-adult habitat tran- <br />sitions where they become sympatric with P. Lu- <br />cius. <br />Native Colorado River fish populations have <br />been extirpated from much of their historic habi- <br />tats by reservoir inundation and altered flow re- <br />gimes. Therefore, recovery efforts have been <br />focused on physical habitat restoration. However, <br />non-native predators such as northern pike, Esox <br />lucius, largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, <br />smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieu, and <br />walleye, Stizostedion vitreum, have been intro- <br />duced with devastating effects (e.g., see Minckley <br />et al. 1991, Tyus 1998, Meretsky et al. 2000). If <br />predation pressure has been the major selective <br />force behind the evolution of enlarged nuchal <br />humps instead of physical habitat constraints as <br />previously reported, this suggests that these species <br />may be especially sensitive to predation by non- <br />native fishes. Hump formation, an interesting <br />adaptation, which presumably resulted in long-life <br />for breeding adults, may no longer provide an <br />effective life strategy. As serious as physical habi- <br />tat loss has been, biological, rather than physical <br />changes may now play the major role in endan- <br />germent of these fishes. In this case, efforts to re- <br />cover these fish will require increased emphasis on <br />the biological attributes of habitat. <br />Acknowledgements <br />This research was conducted as part of the <br />requirements for a Master's thesis in the Depart- <br />ment of Environmental, Population, and Organ- <br />ismic Biology, University of Colorado at Boulder. <br />C. Jordan provided extensive technical support <br />and aided planning during the hydrodynamic <br />portion of this study. We are most grateful for <br />financial contributions, services, and facilities <br />provided by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation <br />Hydraulics Laboratory, Denver, CO. The <br />U.S.G.S. Biological Resources Division at Fort <br />Collins, Colorado and Dexter National Fish <br />Hatchery at Dexter, New Mexico provided access <br />to fish specimens. We also acknowledge assistance <br />by B. Mefford, T. Rozales, R. Hamman, B. <br />Schmidt, L. Sanabria, M. Rose, and D. Center. <br />This study was conducted under provisions of a <br />Federal Endangered Species permit granted by the <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S. Federal Fish <br />& Wildlife Permit PRT-704930). <br />References <br />Adler, F.R. & C.D. Harvell. 1990. Inducible defenses, pheno- <br />typic variability and biotic environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. <br />5: 407-410. <br />Alexander, D.E. 1990. Drag coefficients of swimming animals: <br />effects of using different reference areas. Biol. Bull. 179: 186- <br />190. <br />Br6nmark, C. & J.G. Miner. 1992. Predator-induced pheno- <br />typical change in body morphology in crucian carp. Science <br />258:1348-1350. <br />Br6nmark, C. & L.B. Pettersson. 1994. Chemical cues from <br />piscivores induce a change in morphology in crucian carp. <br />OIKOS 70: 396-402.