My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7021
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:04:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7021
Author
Oamek, G., et al.
Title
Methodology For Analyzing Alternative Reservoir Shortage and Operating Criteria.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P <br /> <br />0 76 <br />A METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYZING ALTERNATIVE RESERVOIR <br />SHORTAGE AND OPERATING CRITERIA <br />George Oamek', Larry Schluntz2, <br />Loren Bottorff, and Eldon Johns` <br />ABSTRACT <br />The Bureau of Reclamation's shifting emphasis from a construction oriented agency to a <br />water management agency has initiated the development of analytical tools for estimating the <br />benefits, and changes in benefits, of alternative reservoir sizes (for new projects) and <br />operating criteria (for existing prvjects). This paper presents a new methodological approach <br />for estimating the marginal, or change in, economic beneftss for a project and applies it to <br />several case studies. <br />The modeling system developed from this effort links a spreadsheet-based model of reservoir <br />operations to economic models of various demand sectors, including irrigation, municipal <br />and industrial uses (M&I), and instream flow. Linking the models resuks in quick response <br />in estimating the annual marginal economic benefits of alternative reservoir sizes and <br />operating criteria. <br />When applied to a case study of an existing Southern California reservoir, the modeling <br />system estimated the annual benefits of reservoir enlargment and changes in operating <br />criteria. Additional case studies for projects in Oregon, Kansas, and Colorado have <br />demonstrated the ability of the methodology to be adapted to a wide range of hydrologic <br />conditions and project purposes. <br />U47RODUCTION <br />Evaluating the economic trade-offs between competing uses of water is of critical <br />importance during times of drought. Under normal conditions, volume and timing of <br />Bureau of Reclamation project deliveries are contractually fixed. Specific contract <br />provisions provide for the operation of the facilities during drought conditions. <br />However, the Bureau of Reclamation is interested in the re-evaluation of the marginal, <br />or change in, economic benefits of alternative water allocations during drought <br />conditions and to re-evaluate reservoir operation strategies which, in turn, would <br />maximize the economic benefits of available supplies. This paper presents a <br />methodology for measuring the marginal benefits of alternative reservoir operation plans <br />which explicitly consider priority of use for various types of users and alternative <br />shortage criteria. <br />The methodology is a linked system consisting of two models, a reservoir operations <br />' Economist, CH2M Hill, 3840 Rosin Court, Suite 110, Sacramento, California, 95834 <br />2 Economist, Bureau of Reclamation, D-5442, Box 25007, Denver, Colorado, 80225 <br />s Water Resource Engineer, CH2M Hill <br />Hydrologist, Bureau of Reclamation
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.