Laserfiche WebLink
34 - 8 PITLICK AND CRESS: DOWNSTREAM CHANGES IN CHANNEL GEOMETRY <br />Table 5. Results of the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) <br />Comparing Downstream Relations for Bank-full Width and Bank- <br />full Depth in Alluvial and Quasi-alluvial Reaches' <br />Bank-full Width Linear Regression <br />Reach Type n a b SE, r2 p <br />Alluvial 72 205 -0.0016 0.00056 0.10 0.0057 <br />Quasi-alluvial 60 187 -0.0022 0.00057 0.20 0.0003 <br />Bank-full Width ANCOVA <br />ss",X nas, , F P <br />Disumcc - 0.0575 0.0967 0.59 0.44 <br />reach tr pe <br />Reach type 1.339 0.0964 13.89 0.0003 <br />Bank-full Depth Linear Regression <br />Reach Type n a b SEA, r2 p <br />Alluvial 72 7.1 -0.0033 0.00043 0.46 <0.0001 <br />Quasi-alluvial 60 7.4 -0.0029 0.00041 0.47 <0.0001 <br />Bank-full Depth ANCOVA <br />S$pK MS- F P <br />Distance « 0.0217 0.0537 0.40 0.53 <br />reach type <br />Reach type 0.3361 0.0534 6.29 0.01 <br />'Notation is the same as in Table 3; SS,,g is the regression sum of <br />squares, and MS,_ is the mean square of the residuals. <br />most notable changes in Tb occur in the same segments <br />where there is clear downstream fining (rkm 300-200 and <br />rkm 139-100); the reverse is also true, i.e. where Tb varies <br />slowly there is also little variation in grain size (rkm 370- <br />310 and rkm 185-140). The correlation between Tb andD50 <br />is clearly important to our main hypothesis, as it implies that <br />the ratio of shear stress to grain size is balanced at both local <br />and regional scales. Figure 9 shows that there is indeed a <br />close correspondence between Dso and Tb in three of the <br />four segments. To evaluate these trends more carefully we <br />compared the regression relations for InD50 and b9Tb within <br />each of the segments listed earlier in Table 4. Formal <br />statistical tests of the relations for the first and third seg- <br />ments (Figures 9a and 9c) are not necessary because these <br />relations are not statistically significant (Table 4); in other <br />words, there is no significant trend in 1nD50 or 1nTb in either <br />of these segments. A t test of the equations for InDS0 and <br />111Tb in the second segment (Figure 9b) indicates that there is <br />no significant difference in the slopes of these relations (p = <br />0.49). Comparison of the equations for the lower segment <br />(Figure 9d) also indicates no significant difference in slopes <br />(p = 0.08), however, this result is not convincing, given the <br />scatter in the grain size data; if the two values of DSO at rkm <br />139 and 136 are removed, then the relations for 1nDso and <br />1116 are nearly parallel. <br />[24] The results presented above indicate that the change <br />in Tb within individual segments is roughly balanced by the <br />change in D50. It follows that the bank-full Shields stress, <br />Th, should be approximately constant from segment to <br />segment. A plot of the individual values of T*b (Figure 10) <br />suggests that this is indeed the case. A least squares fit of <br />the full data set gives the relation lnT*b = 0.048 - 4.7 x <br />10-05 X, with r2 << 0.01 and p = 0.86. If the data from rkm <br />139-105 are excluded, there appears to be a slight negative <br />trend in 1116, but the relation is very weak (r2 = 0.03; p = <br />0.07). Even with these data excluded, the difference in Tb <br />between upper and lower reaches is very small (0.050 to <br />0.045), thus we have no reason to reject the hypothesis that <br />Tb is constant downstream. For the reach as a whole, Tb <br />averages 0.049, which is about 1.5 times typical values for <br />the threshold for motion (0.03). <br />5. Discussion <br />[25] The results of this study show that the geomorphic <br />characteristics of the Colorado River vary systematically <br />downstream to maintain a constant bank-full. Shields stress, <br />Tb. The consistency in T*b holds for reaches that are bounded <br />by different sedimentary strata and potentially for reaches <br />that are influenced by recent tectonism. The Colorado River <br />has developed these geomorphic characteristics apparently <br />in response to regional-scale processes which supply water <br />and sediment in disproportionate amounts. The average <br />annual discharge of the Colorado River roughly doubles <br />through the study area, whereas the average annual sus- <br />pended sediment load increases by a factor of almost four. <br />Longitudinal measurements of bed material grain size show <br />that downstream fining is weak, suggesting that the supply <br />of coarse sediment from tributaries, hillslopes, and terraces <br />is high enough to replenish material worn down by abra- <br />sion, but not high enough to force significant changes in <br />Figure 8. Downstream trends in the bank-full shear stress of the Colorado River. Symbols are the same <br />as in Figure 7.