Laserfiche WebLink
. 2002 R+iYeK 4- cress <br />WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 38, NO. 10, 1216, doi:10.1029/2001 WR000898, 2002 <br />Downstream changes in the channel geometry of a large gravel <br />bed river <br />John Pitlick and Robert Cress <br />Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA <br />Received 20 August 2001; revised 14 May 2002, accepted 24 May 2002, published 30 October 2002. <br />[r] Field data obtained on a nearly contiguous segment of the Colorado River in western <br />Colorado and eastern Utah are used to examine the mechanisms driving downstream <br />changes in channel geometry. Measurements characterizing the bank-full hydraulic <br />geometry, bed material grain size, and average channel gradient were made at closely <br />spaced intervals in 10 alluvial and quasi-alluvial reaches covering 260 km of the river. <br />These data indicate that changes in surface and subsurface grain sizes are small in relation <br />to the change in channel slope: over the full length of the study area, the median grain <br />size of the surface sediment decreases by a factor of a little more than 2, whereas the <br />average channel slope decreases by a factor of about 5. The decreases in slope and median <br />grain size are offset by a large increase in bank-full depth relative to width, such that the <br />bank-full Shields stress, Tb, is constant downstream. For the reach as a whole, Tb averages <br />0.049, which is roughly 50% higher than the threshold for bed load transport. INDEX <br />TERMS: 1815 Hydrology: Erosion and sedimentation; 1824 Hydrology: Geomorphology (1625); KEYWORDS: <br />channel geometry, downstream fining, Shields stress <br />Citation: Pitlick, J., and R. Cress, Downstream changes in the channel geometry of a large gravel bed river, Water Resour. Res.. <br />38(10), 1216, doi:10.1029/2001WR000898, 2002. <br />1. Introduction <br />[2] The problem of predicting downstream trends in <br />channel geometry (width, depth, and slope) remains central <br />to the understanding and modeling of river behavior. <br />Changes in channel geometry are determined both by <br />changes in water discharge [Leopold and Maddock, 1953], <br />and by changes in sediment load and bank properties <br />[Schumm, 19601. The problem therefore is to predict the <br />equilibrium width, depth and slope of a river given repre- <br />sentative values of discharge, sediment load and grain size. <br />Approaches to this problem have been largely empirical, <br />with a heavy emphasis on discharge as the primary control- <br />ling factor [Ferguson, 1986; Knighton, 1987; Church, 19921. <br />Discharge clearly governs sediment transport capacity; how- <br />ever, differences in sediment supply, as well as processes of <br />downstream fining and bank erosion can force longitudinal <br />changes in channel properties without much change in <br />discharge [Schumm, 1960; Brierly and Hickin, 1985; Fergu- <br />son and Ashworth, 1991]. Thus, in addition to the equations <br />for continuity, flow resistance, and sediment transport <br />capacity, the solution to the problem of channel geometry <br />requires a criterion for bank erosion to model the change in <br />width [Henderson, 1966; Parker, 1979; Ferguson, 1986; <br />Chang, 19881, or a "rule" that governs the downstream <br />change in grain size to model the change in sediment load <br />[Pizzuto, 1992]. <br />[3] This paper focuses on channel adjustments in a gravel <br />bed river where the downstream change in discharge is <br />small in relation to the change in sediment supply. The <br />study objectives and approach draw on theory developed by <br />Copyright 2002 by the American Geophysical Union. <br />0043-1397/02/2001 WR000898S09.00 <br />Parker [1978, 1979] to explain the equilibrium morphology <br />of rivers with mobile beds and stable banks. Parker [1978, <br />1979] reasoned that gravel bed rivers will adjust their bank- <br />full width and depth to provide a boundary shear stress, T, <br />that is higher than the threshold for bed load transport, T,., <br />but not so high as to cause bank erosion and widening. The <br />geometry of a gravel bed river should thus bear a consistent <br />relation to the excess shear stress, T/-r,, and the long-term <br />bed load flux, which scales with T/-r,. In the downstream <br />direction, changes in width, depth, slope and/or grain size <br />should nudge the channel in a direction that maintains <br />equilibrium transport. This approach is fundamentally dif- <br />ferent from that taken by Leopold and Maddock [1953] and <br />many others, because flow and sediment transport are <br />coupled directly to the processes of erosion and deposition. <br />The theory has been refined and tested in a number of <br />laboratory experiments [Ikeda et al., 1988; Diplas, 1990; <br />Cao and Knight, 1998; Macky, 1999], and in a few field <br />studies [Andrews, 1984; Pitlick and Van Steeter, 1998]. <br />[4] The data presented in this paper provide a relatively <br />rigorous test of the hypothesis that gravel bed rivers adjust <br />their bank-full channel geometry to carry bed load at shear <br />stresses not far above critical. We test this hypothesis with <br />closely spaced measurements of width, depth, slope, and <br />bed-material grain size along a 260-km reach of the Colo- <br />rado River in and regions of western Colorado and eastern <br />Utah. The study segment is characterized by repeated <br />transitions in valley fonm related to hard and soft sedimen- <br />tary rocks, and it includes two major tributaries: the Gunni- <br />son River and the Dolores River. In contrast to basins in <br />humid and temperate regions, these tributaries and the <br />surrounding area provide proportionally much more sedi- <br />ment than water. Most of this sediment is fine grained (silt <br />and sand); however, the supply of coarse material to the <br />34 -1 <br />q50©