. 2002 R+iYeK 4- cress
<br />WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 38, NO. 10, 1216, doi:10.1029/2001 WR000898, 2002
<br />Downstream changes in the channel geometry of a large gravel
<br />bed river
<br />John Pitlick and Robert Cress
<br />Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
<br />Received 20 August 2001; revised 14 May 2002, accepted 24 May 2002, published 30 October 2002.
<br />[r] Field data obtained on a nearly contiguous segment of the Colorado River in western
<br />Colorado and eastern Utah are used to examine the mechanisms driving downstream
<br />changes in channel geometry. Measurements characterizing the bank-full hydraulic
<br />geometry, bed material grain size, and average channel gradient were made at closely
<br />spaced intervals in 10 alluvial and quasi-alluvial reaches covering 260 km of the river.
<br />These data indicate that changes in surface and subsurface grain sizes are small in relation
<br />to the change in channel slope: over the full length of the study area, the median grain
<br />size of the surface sediment decreases by a factor of a little more than 2, whereas the
<br />average channel slope decreases by a factor of about 5. The decreases in slope and median
<br />grain size are offset by a large increase in bank-full depth relative to width, such that the
<br />bank-full Shields stress, Tb, is constant downstream. For the reach as a whole, Tb averages
<br />0.049, which is roughly 50% higher than the threshold for bed load transport. INDEX
<br />TERMS: 1815 Hydrology: Erosion and sedimentation; 1824 Hydrology: Geomorphology (1625); KEYWORDS:
<br />channel geometry, downstream fining, Shields stress
<br />Citation: Pitlick, J., and R. Cress, Downstream changes in the channel geometry of a large gravel bed river, Water Resour. Res..
<br />38(10), 1216, doi:10.1029/2001WR000898, 2002.
<br />1. Introduction
<br />[2] The problem of predicting downstream trends in
<br />channel geometry (width, depth, and slope) remains central
<br />to the understanding and modeling of river behavior.
<br />Changes in channel geometry are determined both by
<br />changes in water discharge [Leopold and Maddock, 1953],
<br />and by changes in sediment load and bank properties
<br />[Schumm, 19601. The problem therefore is to predict the
<br />equilibrium width, depth and slope of a river given repre-
<br />sentative values of discharge, sediment load and grain size.
<br />Approaches to this problem have been largely empirical,
<br />with a heavy emphasis on discharge as the primary control-
<br />ling factor [Ferguson, 1986; Knighton, 1987; Church, 19921.
<br />Discharge clearly governs sediment transport capacity; how-
<br />ever, differences in sediment supply, as well as processes of
<br />downstream fining and bank erosion can force longitudinal
<br />changes in channel properties without much change in
<br />discharge [Schumm, 1960; Brierly and Hickin, 1985; Fergu-
<br />son and Ashworth, 1991]. Thus, in addition to the equations
<br />for continuity, flow resistance, and sediment transport
<br />capacity, the solution to the problem of channel geometry
<br />requires a criterion for bank erosion to model the change in
<br />width [Henderson, 1966; Parker, 1979; Ferguson, 1986;
<br />Chang, 19881, or a "rule" that governs the downstream
<br />change in grain size to model the change in sediment load
<br />[Pizzuto, 1992].
<br />[3] This paper focuses on channel adjustments in a gravel
<br />bed river where the downstream change in discharge is
<br />small in relation to the change in sediment supply. The
<br />study objectives and approach draw on theory developed by
<br />Copyright 2002 by the American Geophysical Union.
<br />0043-1397/02/2001 WR000898S09.00
<br />Parker [1978, 1979] to explain the equilibrium morphology
<br />of rivers with mobile beds and stable banks. Parker [1978,
<br />1979] reasoned that gravel bed rivers will adjust their bank-
<br />full width and depth to provide a boundary shear stress, T,
<br />that is higher than the threshold for bed load transport, T,.,
<br />but not so high as to cause bank erosion and widening. The
<br />geometry of a gravel bed river should thus bear a consistent
<br />relation to the excess shear stress, T/-r,, and the long-term
<br />bed load flux, which scales with T/-r,. In the downstream
<br />direction, changes in width, depth, slope and/or grain size
<br />should nudge the channel in a direction that maintains
<br />equilibrium transport. This approach is fundamentally dif-
<br />ferent from that taken by Leopold and Maddock [1953] and
<br />many others, because flow and sediment transport are
<br />coupled directly to the processes of erosion and deposition.
<br />The theory has been refined and tested in a number of
<br />laboratory experiments [Ikeda et al., 1988; Diplas, 1990;
<br />Cao and Knight, 1998; Macky, 1999], and in a few field
<br />studies [Andrews, 1984; Pitlick and Van Steeter, 1998].
<br />[4] The data presented in this paper provide a relatively
<br />rigorous test of the hypothesis that gravel bed rivers adjust
<br />their bank-full channel geometry to carry bed load at shear
<br />stresses not far above critical. We test this hypothesis with
<br />closely spaced measurements of width, depth, slope, and
<br />bed-material grain size along a 260-km reach of the Colo-
<br />rado River in and regions of western Colorado and eastern
<br />Utah. The study segment is characterized by repeated
<br />transitions in valley fonm related to hard and soft sedimen-
<br />tary rocks, and it includes two major tributaries: the Gunni-
<br />son River and the Dolores River. In contrast to basins in
<br />humid and temperate regions, these tributaries and the
<br />surrounding area provide proportionally much more sedi-
<br />ment than water. Most of this sediment is fine grained (silt
<br />and sand); however, the supply of coarse material to the
<br />34 -1
<br />q50©
|