Laserfiche WebLink
FEEDING BY LARVAL RAZORBACK SUCKERS <br />50 <br />50 <br />50 <br />c <br />N <br />U 50 <br />L <br />0- <br />50 <br />50 <br />50 <br />50 <br />50 <br />50 <br />C <br />a> <br />U 50 <br />L <br />al <br />50 <br />50 <br />50 <br />345 <br />0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 <br />A Invert. body width (mm) B Invert. body width (mm) <br />FIGURE 2.-Percentage numerical composition (A) and percentage biovolumetric composition (B) of invertebrate <br />body widths in ponds fertilized at high, medium, and low levels at Dexter National Fish Hatchery, New Mexico, <br />1985. Week is indicated in the upper right corner. <br />high- and medium-fertilization treatments by week <br />3 (Figure 4). Cladocerans also occurred in larvae <br />from low-fertilization ponds, but in low volumes. <br />In week 4, eggs dominated larval diets volumet- <br />rically in fertilized ponds and Cladocerans were <br />eaten even more voluminously in unfertilized <br />ponds. Thereafter, cladocerans and chironomids, <br />in shifting proportions and supplemented by nau- <br />plii and ostracods, accounted for most of the gut <br />volumes in all ponds. <br />In week 2, rotifers were the numerically domi- <br />nant invertebrate food of razorback sucker larvae <br />in all ponds (Figure 4). Diets then diversified over <br />the next 4 weeks. Beginning in week 4, cladocerans <br />increased steadily in numerical dietary impor- <br />tance and the amount of this increase was roughly <br />proportional to the amount of pond fertilization <br />that had occurred. Much of the gain in cladoceran <br />frequencies was at the expense of chironomids. <br />Toward the end of the study (weeks 6 and 7), <br />ostracods gained numerical importance to larvae <br />in low- and medium-fertilization treatments, and <br />copepods and eggs were eaten with modest fre- <br />quencies in highly fertilized ponds. 1 <br />After week 2 when larvae measured about 11 <br />mm TL, essentially all larval guts were full of food. <br />Logo (food volume) increased linearly with larval <br />size (rz = 0.54; Figure 5). However, logo (prey <br />number) remained relatively constant (r2 = 0.09) <br />as the size of larvae increased; thus, progressively <br />larger animals were eaten. Neither numbers (F = <br />2. 1, P = 0.12) nor volumes (F = 1.4, P = 0.26) <br />of items in guts differed among treatments for a <br />given size of fish. Treatment data were therefore <br />pooled for regressions. <br />Upper lip length (or the calculated gape) of lar- <br />vae increased linearly with increasing TL (Figure <br />6). The relationship of ULL to TL for larval ra- <br />High Medium Low <br />High Medium Low