Laserfiche WebLink
480 <br />Io0• <br />B. C. Osmundson et al. <br />/ EXPLANATION <br />/•' I <br />GENER RRFUGAIM A? OF <br />70.16' \ ? • / ?C,? 1 <br />Loma C9Q / / <br />70 Sow / <br />Launch <br />Cameo <br />UTAH Gp?? .km 245.5 J <br />Palisade <br />COLORADO ' k" <br />p 9B q? 70 <br />0 6 MILES h9 s \ Grand <br />?s q 6o Q Junction\ Grand .? <br />e ,yo \\\\\\\ Valley <br />WeWater 5 KI Mae ion <br />rkm 297.8 <br />.._.._ ._.. Gyp s <br />rkm 205•3 ...... <br />RM_ . 215, <br />DENVER I*Pky, gee CG <br />SLGy 70• pD? so J <br />•R1 ti <br />C O L O R A D O •••/ y? <br />Fig. 1. Colorado River in the Grand Valley, with designated river kilometers (rkm), including Walter Walker State Wildlife Area (rkm 263.1) <br />(rkm), where the confluence of the Green and Colorado Rivers is <br />considered rkm 0.0 (converted from river miles as mapped by Belknap <br />and Belknap 1974). In the center of the Grand Valley lies the city of <br />Grand Junction, where the confluence of the Gunnison and Colorado <br />Rivers occurs (rkm 275.1). <br />Collection of Muscle Plugs and Selenium Determination <br />In 1994, muscle plugs were collected from 39 Colorado pikeminnow <br />inhabiting the Colorado River in the Grand Valley. Because many <br />Colorado pikeminnow in the Grand Valley have been implanted with <br />passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags, individual fish can often be <br />identified. Thirteen Colorado pikeminnow were captured and biopsied <br />in the "15-mile reach" (a specific reach identified for recovery efforts) <br />of the Colorado River between Palisade and the Gunnison River <br />confluence (rkm 297.7 to 275.1) (Figure 1). Twenty-four Colorado <br />pikeminnow were captured and biopsied in the "18-mile reach" <br />(another recovery area) of the Colorado River between the Gunnison <br />River confluence and Loma (rkm 275.1 to 245.5). Of these 24, 16 were <br />captured at Walter Walker State Wildlife Area (WWSWA), a prespawn- <br />ing staging area at rkm 263. 1, currently used by Colorado pikeminnow <br />and razorback suckers. Also, two Colorado pikeminnow were captured <br />and biopsied in Horsethief and Ruby Canyons between Loma (rkm <br />245.5) and Westwater (rkm 205.3). <br />During 1995, a total of 45 Colorado pikeminnow were captured at <br />WWSWA. Of these, 11 were fish previously biopsied in 1994. Six of <br />the 45 fish were captured multiple times during summer 1995 and had <br />muscle plugs taken each time. In 1996, muscle plugs were taken from a <br />total of 35 Colorado pikeminnow captured at WWSWA. Of these 35 <br />fish, three had been previously biopsied in both 1994 and 1995. Four of <br />the 35 fish were captured and had plugs taken several times during the <br />1996 summer. <br />Muscle plugs were taken following procedures specified by William- <br />son (1992) in which a different 5-mm sterile biopsy punch was used on <br />each fish and discarded after use. Disposable forceps (also used only <br />once) were used to remove the muscle plug from the biopsy punch. <br />Muscle plugs were taken from the dorsal area approximately 1-2 cm <br />anterior to the origin of the dorsal fin and 1-2 cm to either side of the <br />spine. Samples were placed in chemically cleaned vials, chilled with <br />wet ice in the field, frozen the same day, and kept frozen until <br />preparation for analysis. Muscle plugs were collected by U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service biologists while conducting concurrent Colorado pikem- <br />innow distribution and abundance surveys (see Osmundson and Burn- <br />ham 1998, Mourning 1995 for capture methods). For fish repeatedly <br />sampled over time, the second or third muscle plug was taken immediately <br />adjacent to the location of previous biopsies (1-2 cm from dorsal fin). <br />Determination of Selenium in Fish Muscle Plugs <br />All sample preparation prior to neutron activation analysis was <br />conducted by the Environmental and Contaminants Research Center <br />(ECRC) and has been described by Waddell and May (1995). Samples <br />were transported to the University of Missouri Research Reactor <br />(MURR) staff where the determination of the radionuclide Seem was <br />made using procedures of McKown and Morris (1978). Sample <br />transfer, irradiation, and detection parameters for the determination of <br />the radionuclide Se77- in fish muscle plugs by neutron activation have <br />been described by Waddell and May (1995). <br />Statistical Treatment <br />A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine how selenium <br />concentrations in muscle plugs changed in 11 recaptured Colorado <br />pikeminnow between 1994 and 1995 (Snedecor and Cochran 1972). To <br />calculate sample means of selenium concentrations in Colorado <br />pikeminnow from WWSWA for each year, multiple plugs from the <br />same fish (taken at time spans ranging from 1 day to >2 months) were <br />averaged together to calculate a mean concentration per fish per year. A <br />linear regression was performed to determine how change in body <br />weight affected selenium concentrations in the muscle plugs (Dowdy <br />and Wearden 1983). Percent changes in body weight were transformed <br />by aresin (X)-1/2 to improve normality (Zar 1974). A linear regression <br />r