Laserfiche WebLink
944 <br />OSMUNDSON ET AL. <br />.? rL <br />7l <br />2 •: <br />00 ' MOAB <br />o <br />Go`0 <br />m <br />Lake Powell <br />UTAH <br /> RULISON <br />UPPER REACH <br />5 GRAND JUNCTION CAME' <br /> 6 <br /> ?© <br />O <br />? <br />? <br />7y <br />O' <br /> <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />o <br />2s so 7s 100 <br /> <br />I <br />I KILOMETERS <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />OLORADO <br />FIGURE 1.-Map of the study area. The lower boundary is the Green River confluence. Upper and lower study reaches <br />are separated by Westwater Canyon. Also marked are the upper ends of the study area on the Colorado and Gunnison <br />rivers where diversion dams blocked upstream movement of fish. Dotted lines demarcate the boundaries of the seven <br />study strata (numbered). Starred circles are locations of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service thermographs; crossed circles <br />are locations of U.S. Geological Survey gauging stations with thermographs. <br />marily in more upstream reaches. The best spawn- <br />ing habitat ostensibly occurs in middle to upper <br />reaches, and long-distance drift provides a mech- <br />anism for delivering emerging larvae to optimal <br />nursery habitat, generally located far downstream <br />(Tyus 1990). With young fish primarily in lower <br />river reaches, higher concentrations of adults in <br />upper reaches suggest that distribution of sub- <br />adults or adults requires extensive upstream move- <br />ments. To date, these movements have not been <br />documented and factors associated with such <br />movements are poorly understood. <br />Our primary objectives were to describe the dis- <br />tribution of subadults and adults in the Colorado <br />River, document their dispersal patterns, and at- <br />tempt to explain what motivates such dispersal. <br />We hypothesized that upstream movement of <br />young adults is a response to resource gradients. <br />More specifically, we hypothesized that upstream <br />dispersal results from individuals seeking foraging <br />areas more likely to meet the changing food re- <br />quirements of a growing piscivore, and we inves- <br />tigated spatial variation in Colorado squawfish <br />body condition and abundance of likely forage <br />species. Longitudinal temperature gradients were <br />also examined and related to the distribution of <br />adults. <br />Methods <br />Study area.-The study area included the oc- <br />cupied range of the Colorado squawfish in the Col- <br />orado River, from the confluence with the Green <br />River in Utah upstream to the Grand Valley di- <br />version dam at Palisade, Colorado (the latter is a <br />barrier to upstream movement; Figure 1). Also in- <br />cluded was the lowermost 3.5 km of the Gunnison <br />River, from the confluence with the Colorado River <br />upstream to the Redlands diversion dam (also a <br />barrier to upstream movement). Locations are in <br />river kilometers (rkm) from the Green River con- <br />fluence (rkm 0.0), converted from river miles as <br />mapped by Belknap and Belknap (1974). The <br />study area (Figure 1) was partitioned into a lower <br />reach that extended from rkm 0.0 upstream to the <br />lower end of Westwater Canyon (rkm 181.0) and <br />an upper reach from the upper end of Westwater <br />Canyon (rkm 200.0) upstream to the Grand Valley <br />diversion dam (rkm 298.1). Westwater Canyon, a