Laserfiche WebLink
954 <br />OSMUNDSON ET AL. <br />bolic demands require more food, but appropriate <br />food for adults is scarce. <br />Evidently the motivation for upstream dispersal <br />is strong given that these movements are against <br />the current and away from a more preferred ther- <br />mal regime. Stuntz and Magnuson (1976) reported <br />that preferred temperatures of bluegills Lepomis <br />macrochirus decreased in laboratory studies as <br />food ration decreased, and they suggested that <br />bluegills use temperature selection as a method of <br />decreasing weight loss during periods when daily <br />rations are low. We suggest here that this same <br />phenomenon, acting in concert with searches for <br />greater food availability, motivate upstream dis- <br />persal in Colorado squawfish and result in the lon- <br />gitudinal structuring of size distributions observed <br />in the Colorado River. <br />Factors other than changing food requirements <br />may induce long-range displacements by adult <br />Colorado squawfish; these include predator avoid- <br />ance, reproduction, and physical habitat prefer- <br />ences. Of these, predator avoidance is probably <br />least important given the rarity of predators ca- <br />pable of preying on adult Colorado squawfish. Be- <br />cause seasonal movements related to spawning <br />were excluded from our analyses, displacements <br />from one spring period to the next were probably <br />not the direct result of reproductive behavior; that <br />is, Colorado squawfish generally return to non- <br />spawning home ranges by late summer or fall <br />(Tyus 1990; McAda and Kaeding 1991). Searches <br />for areas containing preferred meso- or microhab- <br />itats may contribute to observed movements and <br />distribution, particularly within strata. However, <br />because habitat and food are so tightly interrelated, <br />it is difficult to separate selection for food from <br />selection for habitat types that allow efficient for- <br />aging (Magnuson et al. 1979). It seems reasonable <br />to assume that in an environment with minimal <br />intraspecific competition and predation risk, po- <br />sitioning of adults, both within and among strata, <br />would be primarily driven by growth maximiza- <br />tion (see Hughes 1998), and growth is largely de- <br />pendent on the interaction of temperature and food <br />availability (Weatherley 1972). Achieving maxi- <br />mum growth potential enhances the ability of the <br />individual to survive and reproduce successfully. <br />In many fish species, large females produce more <br />and larger eggs, thereby enhancing larval survival <br />(Monteleone and Houde 1990; Brandt and Kirsch <br />1993). <br />Adults probably select reaches containing the <br />best combination of resources, and the upper <br />reach, particularly strata 6 and 7 (the Grand Valley) <br />where adults were most concentrated, may rep- <br />resent the best balance between suitable temper- <br />atures and food availability. At some distance up- <br />stream, annual thermal units should decline to the <br />point where plentiful forage can no longer provide <br />adequate compensation, resulting in reduced <br />growth. This probably occurs within the reach im- <br />mediately upstream of the Grand Valley where an- <br />nual thermal units are low. At Rulison, mean daily <br />temperatures never reached 20°C during 3 of the <br />5 years studied. Black and Bulkley (1985b) found <br />that growth of yearling Colorado squawfish held <br />at 20°C and fed unlimited food was only 54% that <br />of growth at the optimum temperature of 25°C. <br />This reach, blocked by diversion structures since <br />the turn of the century, may represent the fringe <br />of the former range of this species in the Colorado <br />River. <br />Seasonal timing of and stimulus for movement <br />could not be discerned in this study by comparing <br />consecutive capture events. However, the available <br />evidence allows us to offer four hypotheses. First, <br />movements may be motivated by hunger with up- <br />stream exploration for food being more rewarding <br />than downstream exploration. Second, an innate <br />physiological mechanism may prompt upstream <br />movement; however, the lack of dispersal move- <br />ments in many fish and the downstream movement <br />of some are counter to a species-wide directional <br />disposition. Third, movements may be motivated <br />by the urge to spawn, and better feeding areas are <br />discovered in the process. Movement primarily by <br />sexually mature individuals supports the latter hy- <br />pothesis, but sizable numbers of adult fish are <br />found in upper White and Yampa river reaches far <br />upstream of their spawning areas (Tyus 1990), sug- <br />gesting that upstream feeding areas were not lo- <br />cated while en route to a spawning site. <br />A fourth hypothesis, combining the hunger and <br />spawning hypotheses above, may be the most plau- <br />sible given all lines of circumstantial evidence. <br />Gradients in food resources may be discovered by <br />young adults during their initial spawning migra- <br />tions, and these learned gradients are then pursued <br />after the spawning period is completed, resulting <br />in further upstream explorations by young adults. <br />If this latter hypothesis has merit, we might predict <br />that such displacements take place during and im- <br />mediately following the spawning period. <br />The extent to which distribution and dispersal <br />patterns observed in this study reflect historic con- <br />ditions is unknown. Intraspecific competition for- <br />merly might have played a role in structuring riv- <br />erwide size distributions; now such competition in <br />l