My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8162
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8162
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:04:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8162
Author
Osmundson, D. B., R. J. Ryel, M. E. Tucker, B. D. Burdick, W. R. Elmblad and T. E. Chart.
Title
Dispersal Patterns of Subadult and Adult Colorado Squawfish in the Upper Colorado River.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
952 <br />OSMUNDSON ET AL. <br />TABLE 4.-Diets of Colorado squawfish (400-550 mm <br />total length) during spring 1994. Values are overall vol- <br />umes of each food item as a percentage of total volume <br />(100%) and are averages from all fish containing food (see <br />text); UI = unidentified; MOD = miscellaneous organic <br />debris. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />omponent <br />Reach <br /> <br />Lower Upper <br />(N = 16) (N = 17) Habitat <br /> <br />Back- <br />waters Channel <br />(N = 30) (N = 9) <br />UI fish parts 23.6 35.8 30.2 20.8 <br />UI fish 24.5 2.9 11.5 11.5 <br />Fathead minnow 27.2 28.2 35.3 27.6 <br />Red shiner 0.0 11.1 6.8 0.0 <br />Sand shiner 13.7 0.0 1.3 25.1 <br />Roundtail chub 9.3 0.0 3.3 5.8 <br />Green sunfish <br />Lepomis cyanellus 0.0 5.8 3.3 0.0 <br />White sucker 0.0 10.9 6.2 0.0 <br />Annelids 0.9 0.7 1.0 0.7 <br />MOD 0.8 4.5 1.0 8.6 <br />significantly higher than in all other strata, and <br />stratum 6 CPUE was higher than that in stratum 5. <br />Diet <br />The modified Seaburg stomach sampler proved <br />effective in removing stomach contents from Col- <br />orado squawfish smaller than about 550 mm. For <br />larger adults, the method was abandoned due to <br />persistent difficulties associated with (1) handling <br />the fish while attempting to manipulate the flush- <br />ing tube, (2) passing tubes of sufficient length and <br />diameter (to encapsulate large prey) down the <br />esophagus, and (3) producing sufficient flushing <br />pressure with the squeeze bulb for forcing items <br />through the large tubes. Efforts to encourage large <br />fish to regurgitate their stomach contents by using <br />tartar emetic (after Jernejcic 1969) were also aban- <br />doned because of apparent stress to the fish. <br />Diets of Colorado squawfish 400-550 mm cap- <br />tured in the upper reach were similar to those of <br />fish captured in the lower reach and were similar <br />between fish captured from main channel and <br />backwater habitats (Table 4). Fish in stomach sam- <br />ples were generally small: lengths of fathead min- <br />nows, the most common prey, averaged 51 mm <br />(SL) whereas roundtail chub and white sucker av- <br />eraged 85 and 70 mm (SL), respectively. Of stom- <br />achs containing identifiable fish (N = 27), 63% <br />contained one fish; 26% contained two or three <br />fish; 4% contained five fish; and 7% contained six <br />or seven fish. Feeding rate may be reduced in this <br />species prior to spawning: significantly more (test <br />of proportions, P = 0.002) sampled fish 400-550 <br />mm (TL) had empty stomachs from 26 May to 20 <br />June (93%, N = 14) than fish sampled before 26 <br />May (41%, N = 58) in the early spawning year of <br />1994. Percentages of empty stomachs before 26 <br />May were similar (P > 0.05) between lower (38%, <br />N = 26) and upper reaches (44%, N = 32). <br />Temperature <br />Annual thermal units for growth decreased in <br />an upstream direction as expected (Table 5). As a <br />percentage of thermal units in stratum 1, thermal <br />units in stratum 3 were 93%; in stratum 5, 81%, <br />in stratum 6, 71%; in stratum 7, 62%; at Cameo, <br />54%; and at Rulison, 42%. Thermal units de- <br />creased between sites in strata 1 and 3 by an av- <br />erage of 0.08 units/rkm; between strata 3 and 5 <br />sites by 0.17/rkm; between strata 5 and 6 sites by <br />0.15/rkm; between strata 6 and 7 sites by 0.23/ <br />rkm; between stratum 7 and Cameo sites by 0.24/ <br />TABLE 5.-Total annual thermal units for Colorado squawfish growth at seven temperature-monitoring stations along <br />the Colorado River. Bold italics indicate missing values that were estimated. Missing values for stratum 1 were estimated <br />by using the relationship between thermal growth units there and at the stratum 3 or stratum 5 sites; missing values for <br />strata 3 and 6 were estimated from stratum 5 values; missing values for the Rulison (R) site were estimated from the <br />Cameo (C) site values. No thermograph was located in stratum 7 during the 1992-1996 period; all yearly totals are <br />estimates based on the relationship between thermal growth units there and at the Cameo site (a ratio of 1.165:1) <br />developed during 1986-1991 (not shown); Rkm = river kilometers upstream of the confluence with the Green River. <br /> <br /> <br />Stratum <br />or site Location <br /> <br /> <br />Rkm <br /> <br /> <br />992 <br /> <br /> <br />993 <br />Year <br /> <br />1994 <br /> <br /> <br />995 <br /> <br /> <br />996 <br /> <br /> <br />ean (SE) <br />1 87.4 100.9 68.3 97.6 53.1 85.2 81.0 (9.0) <br />3 158.2 85.3 53.5 96.7 47.2 77.2 72.0 (7.5) <br />5 214.6 73.6 46.2 87.4 39.2 65.9 62.5 (7.5) <br />6 264.7 63.9 41.3 75.9 34.6 59.4 55.0 (8.8) <br />7 292.8 60.4 34.0 68.8 29.7 49.3 48.4 (9.4) <br />C 321.4 51.9 29.2 59.1 25.5 42.3 41.6 (6.4) <br />R 369.9 40.4 22.8 46.6 19.1 33.8 32.5(5.2)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.