Laserfiche WebLink
March 2008 EXTINCTION-PRONE TRAITS OF DESERT FISHES <br />0 <br />w 10 <br />N 6 <br />I <br />ca 2 i <br />Z L ME MI HE Hl <br />a <br />a) <br />.v <br />Lei <br />0 <br />Z <br />I <br />Maximum body length - 95.0 cm <br />Yac No <br />10 <br />4 <br />s L <br />2 <br />1 <br />o L ME MI HE HI <br /># <br />c L ME Ml HE Hl <br />853 <br />A <br />I Maximum body length = 9.6 cm 1 <br />ra Yes _ 6 li Nn <br />m 4 <br />a 2 2 <br />0 - 0 ?n - <br />Z L ME Ml HE HI L ME MI HE HI <br />B Yes - ..""I? <br />( n guarder Parental care g t.5 2 No <br />m open substrate) (reproductive guild) (all others) <br />U <br />CL 2 <br />Z L ME MI HE HI L ME MI HE HI <br />All Trophic guild Herbivore/ <br />? others I detri#ivore <br />v 4 4 <br />C 2 <br />O 0 0 <br />Z L ME Ml HE HI L ME Ml HE HI <br />Swim factor :mz? 0.39 <br />co <br />4 Yes 4 No <br />N 2 i? 2 <br />0 0 0 <br />Z L ME Ml HE HI L ME MI HE HI <br />C <br />D <br />Length at maturity =10.2 cm <br />(age at maturity :EE 2.5 years) <br />Yes (longevity :5 6.0 years) No <br />2 2 <br />1 1 i <br />0 <br />L ME MI HE HI L ME MI HE HI <br />F G <br />FrG. 3. Classification tree discriminating among native species of the Lower Colorado River Basin according to level and source <br />of threat to extinction: none/low risk (L) indicated by black bars, moderate risk (ME) and high risk (HE) from environmental <br />alterations indicated by white bars, and moderate risk (MI) and high risk (HI) from species invasions indicated by gray bars. In all <br />panels, the y-axis represents the number of species. According to the tree branching topology, we also interpret the best competitive <br />surrogate splits (indicated in parentheses) that showed similar classification power to the primary split. Letters A-G indicate <br />terminal nodes. <br />bimodal relationship with extinction vulnerability <br />whereby both small- and large-bodied native fishes were <br />more at risk. The same relationship is evident for the <br />world's freshwater fishes; globally imperiled species <br />exhibit a bimodal size-frequency distribution indicating <br />that small- and large-bodied species are relatively more <br />threatened (Olden et al. 2007). We found that lack of <br />parental care and specialized feeding behavior also were <br />associated with elevated extinction risk, but their effects <br />were only apparent for intermediate body sizes. These <br />results suggest that the manner in which species traits <br />are related to the extinction risk of Lower Colorado <br />River fishes is both complex and sensitive to other life- <br />history attributes, including body size. Broader support <br />for this finding comes from Cardillo et al. (2005) who <br />showed that the relationship between extinction risk of <br />mammals and life-history traits varies as a function of <br />body size. <br />By partitioning overall extinction risk according to <br />different sources of threat, we improved our under- <br />standing of the linkages between fish species traits and <br />specific drivers of environmental change in the Lower <br />Colorado River Basin. An important finding was that <br />species under threat to environmental alteration are <br />characterized by body morphologies indicative of <br />weaker swimming ability (and potentially poor dispersal