My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7623
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7623
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:01:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7623
Author
Lamb, B. L. and D. A. Sweetman.
Title
Guidelines for Preparing Expert Testimony in Water Management Decisions Related to Instream Flow Issues.
USFW Year
1979.
USFW - Doc Type
Instream Flow Information Paper No. 1, Revised,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
attorney (U. S. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 89 F. Supp. 357 [D. Mass, <br />1950]). Ordinarily, the information in question must come from within the <br />government. (U.S. v. Anderson, 34 F.R.D. 518 [D. Colo, 1963]). <br />The privilege extends to communications: <br />a) from the agency to the agency attorney; <br />b) from the agency to attorneys in two separate agencies <br />representing the agency; <br />c) from an agency to another agency acting as attorney for the <br />first agency (Thill Securities Corp. v. N.Y. Stock <br />Exchange, 57 F.R.D. 133 [1972]; U.S. v. Gates, 35 F.R.D. <br />524 [1964]); and <br />d) between attorneys respresenting a single client or from the <br />attorney to his client if the communication is based on the <br />original confidential information communicated by the <br />client. (Insur. of N.A. v. Union Carbide Corp., 35 F.R.D. <br />520 [D. Colo, 1964]). <br />WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE <br />Although the "work product" privilege applies only to material which is <br />legal in nature, prepared by an attorney, relating to specific litigation and <br />confidential (not communicated to or from outsiders), there is an excepted <br />area covered that involves expert witnesses. This exception is the so-called <br />"written memory" rule; a major exception receives only a qualified immunity. <br />If substantial need under Rule 26(b) (3) F.R.C.P. can be demonstrated, <br />together with a showing of due hardship in obtaining the material through <br />other means, the court will permit discovery.2 <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />No rigid distinction can be drawn in the above discussion between trials <br />in courts and administrative proceedings because lawyers have used increasing- <br />ly the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain those documents discover- <br />able under court rules. Having complied with the mechanical requirements of <br />43 CFR Part 2, such as making a request in writing at the right office, a <br />party is entitled to review and copy materials subject to some exceptions. <br />2 It should be noted that the requirement to show "good cause" under <br />Rule 34 F.R.C.P. (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) to obtain produc- <br />tion of documents was deleted by the 1970 amendment to the rules, <br />"relevance" being the general guide to production after that date. <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.