Laserfiche WebLink
problems of presenting sometimes very complex scientific or technical data and <br />to cooperate with the lawyer in presenting the testimony in terms understand- <br />able to lay persons who will be reviewing the evidence and deciding.the case. <br />An attitude of "stupid questions" or "this stupid lawyer" and "this stupid <br />judge" on the witness's part may be fatal to a proper presentation. Correla- <br />tively, the attorney must use his talents to the utmost to assist the witness <br />in making the presentation as succinct and manageable as possible and com- <br />pletely intelligible to the lay person. A trial involving expert testimony is <br />not a sparring match between the witness and his attorney but should be looked <br />upon as an educational exercise -- enlightening the trier of facts to the <br />scientific or technical bases of the position to be presented. Humility on the <br />part of both the witness and the attorney is an indispensable asset in <br />approaching this difficult task. <br />It has often been said that the direct testimony of an expert witness <br />consists of four parts: (a) his qualifications (by education or experience) <br />as an expert; (b) the material from which he fashions his opinion; (c) the <br />process or reasoning by which he gets from the material at hand to his con- <br />clusion or opinion; and (d) the conclusion or opinion itself. Usually there <br />is little dispute over an expert's personal background and that information <br />comes in without question. In many cases the presentation of raw data itself, <br />or with a clear statistical explanation, is enough for one to draw a con- <br />clusion, and logical step-by-step delineation of how the experiment was <br />conducted or how the field samples were analyzed is vital to showcase these <br />data. Actual examples of testimony will be presented in the later discussion <br />of cross-examination to show what should and should not be done. <br />DISCOVERY <br />Discovery is a general term used to describe the process by which one <br />side in litigation finds out the factual basis for the other side's case. <br />Discovery can be used to help build a case against the government, particular- <br />ly when data or documents relative to the issues are not otherwise available. <br />In Federal or State court actions, there are several procedures by which this <br />can be accomplished. The most frequently used procedure is the taking of oral <br />depositions. Under this procedure, the potential witness is placed under oath <br />before a court reporter and asked a wide range of questions designed to <br />prepare the opposing lawyer for his testimony at the trial. The deposition is <br />also an opportunity for the opposition to ask about reports, memos, maps, lab <br />books, pictures, and other materials which the person giving the deposition <br />knows of or may have in his possession and which he does not intend to use in <br />the trial, i.e., material which the other side may wish to use. By use of a <br />subpoena duces tecum (very roughly "you are ordered to appear and bring all <br />the following documents with you") the opposing party can force a scientist to <br />collect all material which might be applicable to the issue. The lawyer may <br />precede the "noticing" of a deposition by filing a motion to inspect all the <br />documents related to the question. This helps prepare him to take the deposi- <br />tion. <br />7