My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7623
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7623
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:01:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7623
Author
Lamb, B. L. and D. A. Sweetman.
Title
Guidelines for Preparing Expert Testimony in Water Management Decisions Related to Instream Flow Issues.
USFW Year
1979.
USFW - Doc Type
Instream Flow Information Paper No. 1, Revised,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
problems of presenting sometimes very complex scientific or technical data and <br />to cooperate with the lawyer in presenting the testimony in terms understand- <br />able to lay persons who will be reviewing the evidence and deciding.the case. <br />An attitude of "stupid questions" or "this stupid lawyer" and "this stupid <br />judge" on the witness's part may be fatal to a proper presentation. Correla- <br />tively, the attorney must use his talents to the utmost to assist the witness <br />in making the presentation as succinct and manageable as possible and com- <br />pletely intelligible to the lay person. A trial involving expert testimony is <br />not a sparring match between the witness and his attorney but should be looked <br />upon as an educational exercise -- enlightening the trier of facts to the <br />scientific or technical bases of the position to be presented. Humility on the <br />part of both the witness and the attorney is an indispensable asset in <br />approaching this difficult task. <br />It has often been said that the direct testimony of an expert witness <br />consists of four parts: (a) his qualifications (by education or experience) <br />as an expert; (b) the material from which he fashions his opinion; (c) the <br />process or reasoning by which he gets from the material at hand to his con- <br />clusion or opinion; and (d) the conclusion or opinion itself. Usually there <br />is little dispute over an expert's personal background and that information <br />comes in without question. In many cases the presentation of raw data itself, <br />or with a clear statistical explanation, is enough for one to draw a con- <br />clusion, and logical step-by-step delineation of how the experiment was <br />conducted or how the field samples were analyzed is vital to showcase these <br />data. Actual examples of testimony will be presented in the later discussion <br />of cross-examination to show what should and should not be done. <br />DISCOVERY <br />Discovery is a general term used to describe the process by which one <br />side in litigation finds out the factual basis for the other side's case. <br />Discovery can be used to help build a case against the government, particular- <br />ly when data or documents relative to the issues are not otherwise available. <br />In Federal or State court actions, there are several procedures by which this <br />can be accomplished. The most frequently used procedure is the taking of oral <br />depositions. Under this procedure, the potential witness is placed under oath <br />before a court reporter and asked a wide range of questions designed to <br />prepare the opposing lawyer for his testimony at the trial. The deposition is <br />also an opportunity for the opposition to ask about reports, memos, maps, lab <br />books, pictures, and other materials which the person giving the deposition <br />knows of or may have in his possession and which he does not intend to use in <br />the trial, i.e., material which the other side may wish to use. By use of a <br />subpoena duces tecum (very roughly "you are ordered to appear and bring all <br />the following documents with you") the opposing party can force a scientist to <br />collect all material which might be applicable to the issue. The lawyer may <br />precede the "noticing" of a deposition by filing a motion to inspect all the <br />documents related to the question. This helps prepare him to take the deposi- <br />tion. <br />7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.