My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7204
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:01:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7204
Author
Lanigan, S. H. and C. R. B. Jr.
Title
Distribution and Abundance of Endemic Fishes in the White River in Utah
USFW Year
1979.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Contract Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
58 <br />Two hybrids involving threatened or endangered species were collected. <br />One individual of the Gila c ha-G. ele ans complex was collected at the <br />mouth of the White River. A flannelmouth x humpback sucker hybrid was col- <br />lected 52 mi (96 km) above the confluence with the Green River. <br />Six adult squawfish were captured and seven observed in the lower 12.2 <br />mi (19.6 km) of the White River, another was captured 29.5 mi (55 km) from <br />the mouth, and another captured 42.3 mi (78 km) from the mouth. All fish <br />were captured in habitat reported to be preferred by squawfish. No conclu- <br />sions could be drawn concerning the sex, maturity or degree of ripeness of <br />the specimens. Extensive sampling of larval and juvenile squawfish habitat <br />was conducted but no young squawfish were found. <br />This is the first documented report of squawfish in the Utah portion of <br />the White River, and suggests that squawfish utilize major tributaries to the <br />Green River at least some of the time. The presence of Colorado squawfish <br />throughout the river confirms the U. S. Fish and Wildlife's evaluation of the <br />White River as "Value Class I: Highest-valued fishery resource". <br />Water quality data had little variation between stations in the upper <br />42 mi (76 km) of the river and was similar to that recorded by other agencies <br />for the previous 2 years.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.