My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9450
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9450
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:01:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9450
Author
Land and Water Fund of the Rockies.
Title
Gunnison Basin Water
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
No Panacea for the Front Range.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Meeting Water Demand Without Gunnison Water <br />a more advanced water conservation program than most other providers in the larger <br />metro area. If other area providers were included, the efficiency of water use in the <br />metro area, as measured by per capita consumption, would show even more room for <br />improvement. <br />2001 Single Family Residential Daily Per Capita Water Use. "' <br />As the above graph makes clear, Denver residents use considerably more water <br />per-capita than residents in several other southwestern cities."' In 2001, Denver's <br />single-family residential (SFR) use was 163 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). By <br />comparison, in the same year El Paso had a SFR use of 1,27 gpcd. Tucson had an even <br />lower SFR use figure: 112 gpcd. We focus on the residential sector, and SFR use in <br />particular because it represents a large percentage of urban water demand and cities <br />have more consistent accounting data available for this sector than for others. <br />Importantly, cities that have lower per capita use than Denver have even hot- <br />ter average temperatures and sometimes receive half as much precipitation as <br />Colorado's Front Range. Yet they still have achieved excellent water efficiency as a <br />result of aggressive price structures, rebates and incentives, and landscape regula- <br />tions. The gap between Denver's performance and cities that have pioneered better <br />water efficiency means Denver has many options left to explore. <br />Following the lead of these cutting-edge cities, it is entirely reasonable to <br />believe that the Denver area could reap conservation savings of a minimum of anoth- <br />er 100,000-150,000 AFA over the next several decades through several avenues. <br />b. Outdoor Conservation Savings <br />In the Denver metro area outdoor uses comprise about 549/o of urban water <br />uses.15' Most of this water goes to irrigate bluegrass and other water-loving turf."' A <br />portion of this water can be conserved through more wide-spread use of urban <br />Xeriscape" <br />Xeriscaping offers a much lower water-using alternative to bluegrass lawns. <br />Xeriscape incorporates seven principles to promote quality landscapes, water conser- <br />Gunnison Basin Water • 37
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.