Laserfiche WebLink
r ? <br />-All lot.- in both tests were incubated in a _ <br />water bath. Fish were not fed during experiment. <br />-Experiments were terminated 10 days after start <br />of treatment for egg test and 3 days after start <br />of treatment for larva test; otoliths were <br />removed and examined with U-V light microscope. <br />--Experiment 2 <br />-Larvae, 2 days post <br />mg/l TC solution of <br />About 3,000 marked <br />plastic tank, fed <br />and reared for more <br />hatching, were immersed in 100 <br />freshwater for 7 hr at 20C. <br />larvae were keLt in 500 ml <br />rotifers and commercial food. <br />than 5 months. <br />-About 15 times during the experiment, 50-100 fish <br />were sampled and otoliths removed and examined in <br />same manner as in Experiment 1. <br />--Experiment <br />-Same ,procedures as in Experiment 2 plus 3,000 <br />control fish. <br />-monitored survival and changes in body length of <br />both groups. <br />-Results <br />--Experiment '1_ <br />-200-300 mg/l for 24-48 hr optimal for eggs; <br />200-300 mg/l for 3-24 hr optimal for larvae. <br />--Experiment 2 <br />-Marked easily detectable (100%) for 105 days post <br />hatching without any special preparation of <br />otoliths. Even 164 days after hatching the <br />percent retention was 100% after grinding or, <br />etching of otoliths. <br />--Experiment 3 <br />-Treatment had no effect on survival and growth of <br />larvae. <br />-Conclusions <br />--Method can be applied to field surveys on the ayu. <br />--Merits of method: (1) suitable for eggs and newly <br />hatched larvae, (2) rapid mass-marking with 100% <br />initial success can be achieved, (3) retention time <br />is comparatively long, (4) no effect on fish's <br />growth or mortality. <br /> <br />8