My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7016
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:00:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7016
Author
Larval Fishes Laboratory.
Title
Development of Marking and Otolith-ageing Techniques for Colorado Squawfish
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Report on Study-Phase 1.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />review of the literature, we identified some method of <br />otolith marking, as the approach which would most likely <br />meet all of our requirements. Further, otolith marking <br />fits nicely into our plans to develop otolith-ageing <br />techniques for Colorado sq_uawfish larvae, since for most <br />mark detection procedures the otolith must be removed from <br />the fish and examined microscopically. <br />Otoliths are the first calcified structures to appear <br />in embryonic stages of most fish. Once formed, the early <br />otolith growth structures remain intact and unchanged for <br />the entire life of the fish (Brothers 1985). Tsukamoto <br />(1985) considered otoliths to be the ideal structure for <br />marking since they are in effect "biological internal <br />tags". Because otoliths are the only permanent and <br />persistent structures present in the very earliest <br />life-history stages, they offer the only possibility for <br />producing an endogenous and unique mark (Brothers 1985). <br />Otolith marking for larval and juvenile fishes has been <br />successfully accomplished by several techniques in a <br />variety of fishes. Many of these observations and <br />experiments were often included in studies of otolith <br />growth, and were not intended to produce marked fish for <br />release into the wild. Brothers (1985) provided an <br />excellent review of otolith-marking techniques. The <br />literature suggested at least four possible approaches to <br />marking the otoliths of fish embryos and early larvae. The <br />various methods require different treatments to produce the <br />mark and different procedures for mark detection (Table <br />1--also included in Table 1 is a summary of procedures for <br />staining fish larvae; staining procedures were considered <br />initially, but were later rejected). The potential <br />otolith-marking methods fell into the following categories <br />(see Brothers 1985 for a complete discussion of <br />each technique): <br />1. Microstructural patterns on otoliths produced by <br />environmental maniuulations. Brothers (1981) observed that <br />although light and feeding manipulations are possibilities, <br />temperature manipulations produce the most reliable and <br />striking results. Marks produced by temperature <br />manipulations are clear and easily distinguishable with <br />light microscopy. Analysis of the mark produced in this <br />manner is quick and economical. <br />2. Chemical rarkers. <br />A. Acetazolamide marking of otoliths. <br />growth inhibitor and produces a mark <br />disruption or interruption of growth. <br />with light microscopy; however, mark <br />the use of the scanning electron <br />Preparation of the otoliths for SEM <br />several detailed steps. <br />Acetazolamide is a <br />on the otoliths by <br />Mark can be detected <br />confirmation requires <br />microscope (SEX). <br />examination involves <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.