My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9526
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9526
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:58:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9526
Author
LaGory, K. E., J. W. Hayse and D. Tomasko.
Title
Recommended Priorities for Geomorphology Research in Endangered Fish Habitats of the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
Argonne, Illinois.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Geomorphology Research Priorities <br />September 2003 <br />• Same as those identified for flooded bottomlands in upper Colorado River <br />subbasin under overall reach-habitat priorities above. <br />b. Spawning bar complexes in the Colorado River (Palisade to Gunnison River, <br />Gunnison River to Loma, Moab Bridge to Green River) and Gunnison River <br />(Hartland Dam to Roubideau Creek). <br />• Same as those identified for spawning bar complexes in upper Colorado River <br />subbasin under overall reach-habitat priorities. <br />c. Connected backwaters and side channels (Moab Bridge to Green River) <br />Same as those identified for connected backwaters in Split Mountain Canyon <br />to Desolation Canyon reach of the Green River under overall reach-habitat <br />priorities above. <br />One aspect of a phased, integrated approach is selection among the identified information <br />needs. For instance, rather than attempting to determine the geomorphic basis of spawning <br />habitats in all nine of the identified high-priority reaches of the upper Colorado River subbasin <br />simultaneously, research should focus on a limited subset of representative spawning areas in <br />one or a few of these reaches. Reaches should be selected for further study on the basis of the <br />results of initial studies to identify and characterize spawning habitats in the subbasin. As <br />relationships among flow, geomorphology, and habitat characteristics are determined in <br />representative study reaches, results can be verified in other high priority reaches. <br />All research of geomorphic processes and habitats should be based on hypothesis testing. <br />We recommend that, whenever possible, studies incorporate experimental manipulations and the <br />testing of predicted responses. We also recommend standardization of research protocols and <br />data collection techniques. It is important to recognize that these recommendations are based on <br />current understanding of habitat requirements and geomorphic processes. It is likely that <br />adjustments to research priorities will be necessary as the research proceeds, and, indeed, the <br />success of the effort will require such adaptation as new information is obtained and inferences <br />are drawn. The research priorities identified in the report are recommendations based on data <br />needs and their importance to recovery. Ultimately, the Recovery Program will determine the <br />direction of future research, and multiple factors (including, but not limited to those considered <br />in this report) will be considered in those determinations. <br />List of Keywords <br />Geomorphology, hydrology, habitats, research priorities, Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, <br />razorback sucker, flooded bottomlands, connected backwaters, spawning bars, Upper Colorado <br />River Basin, Green River subbasin, upper Colorado River subbasin <br />xiv
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.