My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9526
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9526
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:58:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9526
Author
LaGory, K. E., J. W. Hayse and D. Tomasko.
Title
Recommended Priorities for Geomorphology Research in Endangered Fish Habitats of the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
Argonne, Illinois.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Geomorphology Research Priorities <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />September 2003 <br />Activities of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery <br />Program) include habitat improvement and management (e.g., restoration of flooded bottomlands, <br />provision of fish passage) and flow management to provide suitable habitat conditions for the <br />four species of endangered fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin - Colorado pikeminnow <br />(Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila cypha), bonytail (Gila elegans), and razorback <br />sucker (Xyrauchen texanus). In this report, we identify and apply an approach for prioritizing <br />river reaches and habitats for geomorphic research in the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />The goal of this project was to identify priorities for geomorphology research in <br />endangered fish habitats of the Upper Colorado River Basin. These recommended priorities <br />provide input to the Recovery Program as it develops a comprehensive research and monitoring <br />program for endangered fish habitats. Project objectives included: <br />• Review and consolidate geomorphic, habitat, and flow information; <br />• Identify relationships among flow regimes, habitats, fish needs, and recovery goals; <br />and <br />• Identify data gaps and rank their importance to recovery. <br />The report focuses on the reaches and habitats used by life stages (larvae, juveniles, <br />subadults, adults, and spawning) of three of the four species - the Colorado pikeminnow, <br />humpback chub, and razorback sucker. Insufficient information was available on the bonytail to <br />permit a meaningful evaluation. The evaluation includes the Green River between Flaming <br />Gorge Dam and its confluence with the Colorado River and the upper Colorado River upstream <br />of the headwaters of Lake Powell. Major tributaries of these two rivers, up to the point of <br />occupation by endangered fishes, also were included. <br />We developed a linked-matrix approach to systematically and objectively identify overall <br />priorities for research. Spreadsheets were developed that contained scores (0, 1, 2, or 3) to <br />represent relative importance of (1) existing reach use for species and life stages, (2) habitat use <br />for species and life stages, (3) habitat occurrence within planform types, and (4) dependencies <br />between habitat characteristics and hydrologic and geomorphic parameters. Scores also were <br />assigned to life stages and species on the basis of sensitivity to environmental variability and <br />population status, respectively. These scores enabled weighting of life stages and species when <br />scores were combined to determine overall priorities. Weights were applied in a phased manner <br />that enabled consideration of priorities at various levels, including (1) species-life stage, <br />(2) species, and (3) all species combined. Scores were developed during two workshops attended <br />by researchers from various agencies, consulting firms, and universities. <br />The Upper Colorado River Basin was subdivided into the Green River subbasin and the <br />upper Colorado River subbasin. Each major river was divided into reaches based on the <br />dominant geomorphic planform (restricted meander, fixed meander, and canyon). These <br />tx
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.