Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />provided by the river. Riparian areas generally have higher productivity than nearby upland <br />areas in terms of plant and animal biomass and tend to support more species. Riparian areas <br />also are important in the ecological functioning of rivers and streams and regulate nutrient <br />input to the aquatic system (Gregory et al. 1991; Gilliam 1994; Vought et al. 1994). <br />The elevation of riparian zones above rivers and the species composition within these <br />zones are largely functions of river flow, especially minimum and maximum flows and <br />seasonal variations in these values (Stromberg 1993; Auble et al. 1994). Disturbance, <br />especially as related to flood events, also plays a major role in determining species <br />composition in riparian zones (Bendix 1994). For these reasons, the riparian vegetation of <br />regulated rivers, where all of these parameters are often modified, is usually different than <br />the riparian vegetation of unregulated rivers (Carothers and Brown 1991; Nilsson et al. <br />1991). <br />The study reported herein was undertaken to evaluate the effects on riparian <br />vegetation of several potential hydropower operational scenarios at Flaming Gorge Dam, <br />Utah. The Green River below the dam supports a well-defined riparian zone that has <br />increased and changed in response to hydropower operations and other dam operations that <br />began following completion of the dam in 1963. Changes in hydropower operations could <br />result in further changes in the size of the riparian zone as well as the species composition <br />within that zone. <br />The hydropower operational scenarios evaluated in this report include (1) year-round <br />high fluctuation, (2) seasonally adjusted high fluctuation, (3) seasonally adjusted moderate <br />fluctuation, and (4) seasonally adjusted steady flow (Figure 1*). All scenarios would feature <br />minimum releases of 800 cfs and maximum releases of 4,700 cfs (maximum power plant <br />capacity), but the amount of daily fluctuation would be very different among scenarios. For <br />the three seasonally adjusted scenarios, the magnitude of fluctuations would vary from month <br />to month and would be restricted to meet target flows at Jensen, Utah (approximately 90 mi <br />downstream of the dam). These target flows were established by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service in its Biological Opinion regarding operation of the dam, which was issued in 1992 <br />(USFWS 1992). Details on these operational scenarios are provided by Yin et al. (1995). The <br />principal differences among the operational scenarios are summarized as follows: <br />• Year-Round High Fluctuation: Under the year-round high fluctu- <br />ation scenario, there would be no limit on maximum daily fluctuations, <br />and releases would vary from 800 to 4,700 cfs each day. Ramp-rate <br />restrictions would be 3,900 cfs/h (minimum flow to maximum power <br />plant capacity). This operational scenario is representative of current <br />maximum power plant operations using monthly release volumes <br />historically set by the Bureau of Reclamation and was evaluated for <br />comparative purposes. This operational scenario would not comply with <br />the USFWS Biological Opinion. Consideration of this operational <br />*For readability, all figures and tables are placed in sequence following Section 5 of this report.