Laserfiche WebLink
samples and related data (Koterba and others, in press), the NAWQA Program design (Gilliom <br />and others, 1995; Alley and Cohen, 1991), the conceptual framework of the NAWQA Program <br />(Leahy and Wilber, 1991 a and b; Hirsch and others, 1988; Cohen and others, 1988), an imple- <br />mentation plan for the NAWQA Program (Leahy and others, 1990), and a description of a <br />quality-assurance plan for the NAWQA Pilot Program (Mattraw and others, 1989). <br />For the purposes of this report, a protocol identifies a course of action that is mandatory <br />under most circumstances as a consequence of USGS and NAWQA policies. For example, <br />decontaminating equipment according to prescribed methods between uses to avoid cross- <br />contamination of the aquifer is a protocol. A recommended procedure is one that generally is <br />preferred over other procedures that are available or commonly used. A recommended procedure <br />generally conforms to rules for good field practices and is expected to result in reproducible data <br />of desired and defined quality. Recommended procedures are not protocols because they either <br />are too restrictive or possibly inappropriate in some situations. For example, one recommended <br />procedure is to measure the water level in the well before sampling. This is not possible for many <br />water-supply wells. <br />Although modifications to methods are likely as new technologies evolve, the described <br />protocols and recommended procedures reflect methods of data collection and documentation <br />generally considered capable of reproducing data of known quality that are suitable for assess- <br />ment, yet feasible to employ given limitations of time and funds. Their use also promotes consis- <br />tency and comparability of ground-water data among Study Units in the NAWQA Program. <br />Overview of National Water-Ouality Assessment Program <br />The USGS began full-scale implementation of the NAWQA Program in 1991. The goals <br />of the NAWQA Program are to: (1) provide a nationally consistent description of current water- <br />quality conditions for a large part of the Nation's water resources; (2) define long-term trends in <br />water quality; and (3) identify, describe, and explain, as possible, the major factors that affect <br />observed water-quality conditions and trends (Hirsch and others, 1988). <br />The design concepts of the NAWQA Program are based in part on a pilot program that be- <br />gan in 1986. The NAWQA Pilot Program consisted of water-quality assessment in seven study <br />areas. These study areas were distributed geographically throughout the continental United <br />States and represented diverse hydrologic environments and water-quality conditions. Four of <br />the pilot assessments focused on surface water and three focused on ground water. The ground- <br />water pilot study areas were the Carson River Basin in Nevada and California (Welch and Plume, <br />1987); the Central Oklahoma Aquifer in Oklahoma (Christenson and Parkhurst, 1987); and the <br />Delmarva Peninsula in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia (Bachman and others, 1987). <br />The NAWQA Program design that has evolved from the pilot program consists of two ma- <br />jor components: (1) Study-Unit Investigations of both surface and ground water and (2) National <br />Synthesis activities. The design provides information on water quality for policy makers and <br />managers at local, State, regional, and national scales. <br />Investigations of 60 Study Units, which range in area from 1,200 to more than 60,000 <br />square miles, are ongoing or planned. The 60 Study Units include parts of most of the major river <br />2