Laserfiche WebLink
276 M. C. MOLLES, JR., C. S. CRAWFORD AND L. M. ELLIS <br />METHODS <br />Study area <br />The study area was located at Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, approximately 160 km south <br />of Albuquerque, New Mexico at an elevation of about 1400 m. The refuge includes about 14.5 km of the Rio <br />Grande and its associated riparian vegetation, including cottonwood forest. During the summer of 1991, we <br />established experimental and control study sites in cottonwood forest. We chose the two study sites because <br />they were similar to each other in size and vegetative composition and because they had not been flooded for <br />approximately 50 years. The forest floor of both the experimental and control study sites contained large <br />amounts of leaf and woody plant litter. <br />The area of each study site was approximately 3.1 ha. The canopy of both study sites is dominated by Rio <br />Grande cottonwood (Populus fremontii var. wizlizeni) 8-15 m in height, with subcanopies of Goodding wil- <br />low (Salix gooddingii) and tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis). The dominant understory shrubs are seepwillow <br />(Baccharis glutinosa) and New Mexico olive (Forestiera neomexicana), with scattered Russian olive (Elaeag- <br />nus angustifolia), screwbean mesquite (Prosopis pubescens), wolfberry (Lycium torrevi) and false indigo <br />(Amorpha fruticosa). <br />Experimental design <br />We monitored the experimental and control study sites for two years before flooding the experimental site. <br />The purpose of this pre-flood monitoring was to compare leaf litter production, decomposition and forest <br />floor organic matter at the two study sites under non-flooding conditions before the experimental flood. <br />This pre-flood comparison was performed to assess whether changes followed flooding of the experimental <br />site. Such before-after comparisons are now widely applied to large-scale unreplicated experiments <br />(Carpenter et al., 1989; Carpenter, 1990; Rasmussen et al., 1993). <br />Manipulative flooding <br />The water used for flooding the experimental site was diverted from a riverside irrigation canal which is, <br />itself, diverted from the Rio Grande at San Acacia, New Mexico, about 45 km upstream from the experimen- <br />tal site. Water diverted from the canal flows about 200 m down a roadside borrow ditch to the experimental <br />site. Groin dikes and variable-height spillways controlled the water level at the experimental site during <br />flooding. <br />We timed the experimental flood to peak on about 31 May, the average date of peak flow in the 100 year <br />hydrograph for the USGS gauging station on the Rio Grande at Embudo, New Mexico. In 1993, flooding <br />was begun on 17 May, reached a maximum height on 27 May and was held at that level until 3 June. Flood <br />waters were then gradually drained off the experimental site over the next two weeks. <br />Litter production <br />Litter production at each site was monitored with 12 circular rubber tubs, 50 x 10 cm deep. The tub con- <br />tents were collected monthly from September through March, oven-dried for 48 hours at 60°C and weighed. <br />The cumulative dry weight for each site was plotted against time to determine the timing and amount of <br />annual leaf litter production in 1991, 1992 and 1993. Cumulative litter fall from September-March at the <br />two sites was compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test (NPARIWAY procedure, SAS Institute, 1989b). <br />Decomposition <br />Litter bags (15 x 15 cm) were constructed of fibre glass window screening (1 mm mesh) and filled with 5 g <br />of air-dried cottonwood leaves. These leaves were collected in October as senescent leaves from 10 P. <br />fremontii growing near the study sites. Each year, 20 decomposition bags were placed at the study sites <br />and then retrieved in sets of five in late October or early November, on the initial day of placement, <br />mid-April, late June and one year after placement. In the laboratory, the contents of the decomposition <br />bags were oven-dried at 60°C for 48 hours, weighed and ashed. Ash-free dry weights of the litterbag <br />contents at control and flood sites were compared on each collection date using a Wilcoxon rank sum