Laserfiche WebLink
266 M. J. JENNINGS, L. S. FORE AND J. R. KARR <br />dominant taxa in warm water streams throughout much of North America but represented by few species in <br />reservoirs. We used the proportion of individuals as invertivores (PINV) as a substitute metric to measure <br />similar ecological stresses or system responses (Karr et al., 1986; Miller et al., 1988; Steedman, 1988). All <br />proportional metrics excluded shad. Although shad are an important component of these systems, variation <br />in shad abundance among littoral zone samples prevented the detection of differences in other components <br />of the fish assemblage when shad were included. <br />Two metrics are based on reproductive guilds (number of migratory spawning species-TMIG; and num- <br />ber of lithophilic, broadcast-spawning species-TLIT). The TMIG detects the population status of species <br />that typically move large distances to spawn; they may also be affected by human-made structures that block <br />movements. Thus a variety of human actions may contribute to a decline in migratory spawning species. The <br />TLIT is modified from a similar metric (substrate spawning species) evaluated for rotenone data (Dionne <br />and Karr, 1992). Lithophilic spawners comprise a group that may be sensitive to siltation, a common <br />impact known to have deleterious effects on reproduction of some freshwater fishes (Berkman and <br />Rabeni, 1987). For this metric we included only those species that spawn over rocky substrates and do <br />not provide subsequent parental care to their offspring. <br />The RFAI contains two metrics that evaluate the condition of individual fish. The first, also found in IBI, <br />is that proportion of individuals with diseases, parasites or anomalies (PDIS). We hypothesize that this <br />metric reflects the presence of environmental factors that either directly cause abnormalities, or produce <br />stress sufficient to increase the susceptibility of fish to diseases or parasites. We also evaluated the fish health <br />assessment index (FHAI) for its utility as a metric. This composite index of several internal and external <br />indicators of individual health (Goede and Barton, 1990) is calculated by TVA biologists with a sample <br />of 15 largemouth bass taken at each collection site. The FHAI is designed to detect subtle differences in over- <br />all condition, compared with the binary classification of the PDIS metric. Although restricted to a few indi- <br />viduals of a single species, this procedure may provide a comprehensive evaluation of fish condition in an <br />abundant, easily captured top-carnivore. <br />METHODS <br />Fish data set <br />Development of the RFAI is based on electrofishing samples taken by TVA biologists in 10 reservoirs <br />during 1989-1992 in each of three longitudinal zones designated as inflow (upstream end), transition <br />(located in areas where suspended sediments begin to settle out of water column) and forebay (above <br />dam). Two relatively small reservoirs (Wilson and Nickajack) were only sampled in inflows and forebays. <br />An electrofishing sample consisted of a series of 10 timed (10 minutes) runs taken downstream along the <br />bank. The 10 runs were selected to be representative of habitats roughly in proportion to their occur- <br />rence. Field crews attempted to collect all individual fish (except for easily identifiable, large individuals, <br />which were counted from the boat) and large concentrations of young shad or bluegill, for which numbers <br />were estimated. Individuals of important recreational species were identified, measured and counted. <br />Metric values were calculated from cumulative totals of all 10 electrofishing runs because the probability <br />of sampling uncommon species in a single run is low. Because several metrics are based on species counts and <br />the presence of rare species can potentially differentiate sites, combining runs was considered the best <br />approach to define a representative sample. This represents a methodological departure from existing <br />stream versions of the IBI, in which an entire reach, including all representative habitats, can be effectively <br />sampled with a single collection. <br />Metric scoring criteria <br />Ideally, scoring criteria are based on an analysis of pattern along a gradient of human influence. Efforts to <br />define unambiguously such gradients among TVA reservoirs were unsuccessful; therefore, we used an <br />alternative approach. We assumed that the relationship between human actions and the relevant biological <br />variables was similar to those in earlier studies of ecologically equivalent metrics (Karr et al., 1986; Miller <br />et al., 1988; Steedman 1988; Kerans and Karr, 1994). Scoring criteria were based on best (maximum or