Laserfiche WebLink
DAM REMOVAL 259 <br />regarding successional stages in the floodplain forest following drawdown. These predictions will extend <br />over several decades and will be made using the US Fish and Wildlife Service's FORFLO floodplain forest <br />model. This model predicts successional stages for floodplain forest following hydrological changes, and has <br />been applied successfully to hydrological alteration projects in Louisiana, Florida and South Carolina <br />(Pearlstine et al., 1985). <br />The results from this environmental assessment of alternatives for dam removal and river restoration or <br />reservoir retention and management will be utilized by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection <br />and combined with their economic analysis of the alternatives to formulate recommendations on the fate of <br />Rodman Dam. This environmental assessment approach, although not in sufficient detail to function as an <br />EIS, does provide the necessary environmental information on which to formulate a decision on dam <br />removal. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The large number of dams either deemed unsafe through inspections or up for hydroelectric relicensing by <br />the FERC has created an unprecedented opportunity for re-examining the purpose and fate of these dams. <br />The original purpose for which many of the older dams were constructed has changed or been altered by <br />current economic conditions. Many dams were constructed before passage of the National Environmental <br />Policy Act, and environmental concerns were less important at their time of construction than they are <br />today. <br />In many cases, the analysis of possible fates for these dams includes the possibility for dam removal <br />and restoration of the impounded stream or river. Many environmentalists feel that decisions for removal <br />of the Edwards Dam on the Kennebec River in Maine and the Elwha and Glines Canyon dams on the <br />Elwha River in Washington would signal a unparalleled change in philosophy regarding the integrity of <br />river ecosystems. <br />A review of past dam removals in this country is instructive in understanding how dam removal should be <br />assessed as an alternative. As discussed earlier in this paper, sediment transport problems can be significant if <br />a dam is removed. However, several past and proposed dam removals have utilized approaches to assess and <br />minimize sediment transport. Hydrological, hydraulic and sediment transport modelling can be utilized in <br />conjunction with sediment surveys in the reservoir to assess the potential for sediment transport problems <br />if the dam is removed. Dam removal procedures can be developed to minimize sediment transport, such <br />as utilizing sediment traps and hydraulic routing. <br />Biological considerations are equally important in assessing whether a dam should be removed and are <br />sometimes the underlying justification for support of dam removal. In addition to impacts on fish, bird <br />communities often change following impoundment of the river, and wildlife populations are often affected <br />as well. Threatened and endangered species are often also a consideration. The loss of floodplain wetlands is <br />frequently a significant impact resulting from impounding a river. The possibility for dam removal to restore <br />these biological attributes should be assessed when considering the fate of a dam. <br />Proposed dam removals are usually quite controversial, making a unified decision difficult. Further, dam <br />removal is sometimes portrayed as a very simple process, whereby all that needs to be done is to open up the <br />dam and let nature heal itself. A comprehensive environmental assessment of dam removal and reservoir <br />retention alternatives is necessary to overcome both the often simplistic view of dam removal and to estab- <br />lish a more complete understanding of both restoration and retention alternatives. <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS <br />Numerous individuals have been involved in both designing the environmental assessment approach utilized <br />for Rodman Dam and in completing the research efforts comprising the assessment. Among the large <br />number of multidisciplinary scientists and engineers involved in this project, I thank especially Dick <br />Galantowicz, Karen Warr, Judy Bryan, Gary Greenberg, Andy Abraham, Don Rao, Price Robison, <br />Awes Karama, Bob Freeman, Tom Ziegler, Tony Miller, Larry Danek, Mike Tomlinson, Ming Lee, Frank