My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9598
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9598
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:56:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9598
Author
Lubinski, K., J. Wiener and N. Bhowmik.
Title
Regulated Rivers Research and Management.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DAM REMOVAL 257 <br />Table V. Research components of the environmental assessment of dam removal and dam retention alternatives for <br />Rodman Dam by the St Johns River Water Management District <br />Research component Estimated cost and responsibility <br />Research efforts assessing the physical and chemical environment: <br />River transect surveying <br />Bathymetric and sediment depth mapping <br />Hydraulic and hydrological modelling <br />Sediment properties and erodibility characteristics <br />Sediment characteristics, toxics and seedbank analysis <br />Inundated floodplain analysis <br />Sediment transport modelling <br />Sediment resuspension due to wind <br />Sediment loading to the river below the dam <br />Surface water quality analysis <br />Groundwater impacts of drawdown <br />$130000 (contractual) <br />$176000 (contractual) <br />$90 000 (agency effort) <br />$10000 (contractual) <br />$58 000 (contractual) <br />$35000 (contractual) <br />$69 000 (agency contractual effort) <br />$5 000 (agency effort) <br />$5 000 (agency and contractual effort) <br />$44000 (agency and contractual effort) <br />$5 000 (agency effort) <br />Research efforts assessing the biological and ecological environment: <br />Fish populations assessment $24000 (contractual and gratis agency effort) <br />Migratory fish populations analysis $22000 (contractual) <br />Aquatic plant populations and management (gratis agency effort) <br />Bird populations assessment $45 000 (agency effort) <br />Threatened and endangered species and species of special concern $17000 (contractual and gratis agency effort) <br />Floodplain forest succession modelling $55 000 (contractual and agency effort) <br />Habitats assessment $10000 (agency effort) <br />temperatures are sometimes higher in impoundments; they may be reduced below dams through hypolim- <br />netic withdrawal (Baxter, 1977; Walker, 1979; Ward and Stanford, 1989). Fish species composition invari- <br />ably changes due to impoundment, as riverine assemblages are replaced by lacustrine ones (Hynes, 1970; <br />Welcomme, 1979; Meffe, 1984; Boschung, 1987; Li et al., 1987; Ross, 1991). Bird communities often change <br />following impoundment and wildlife populations are frequently affected as well (Nilsson and Dynesius, <br />1994). The loss or alteration of floodplain wetlands after impoundment is typical, and may be significant <br />in regions where floodplain forests are rare (Lugo and Brown, 1984; Potter and Drake, 1989; Romme <br />and Brack, 1991; Larson, 1991; Dynesius and Nilsson, 1994). Threatened and endangered species are some- <br />times impacted by impounding a river (Potter and Drake, 1989; FERC, 1991; Sklar, 1992; Cone, 1993; Pal- <br />mer, 1994), but not always in a unilateral manner (Townsend and Crowl, 1991). Habitat fragmentation and <br />changes in wildlife usage invariably occur due to impoundment (Dodd, 1990; Dynesius and Nilsson, 1994; <br />Nilsson and Dynesius, 1994). <br />There are few published reports of biological and ecological assessments for proposed dam removals; only <br />the proposed Elwha and Glines Canyon Dam removals have extensive assessments predicting biological and <br />ecological impacts of dam removal. In that case, the FERC completed a draft EIS of various retention and <br />removal alternatives (FERC, 1991). Often, the primary biological concern is fish migration, and the pre- <br />dicted outcome of dam removal is obvious (e.g. Woolen Mills Dam, Salling Dam, Columbia Falls Dam, <br />Edwards Dam, Elwha and Glines Canyon dams). <br />The environmental assessment approach designed by the St Johns River Water Management District for <br />the proposed Rodman Dam removal can be divided into two basic groups of research components: (1) <br />efforts assessing the physical and chemical environment: and (2) efforts assessing the biological and <br />ecological environment (Table V). It is important to understand that these research efforts are directed to <br />provide the Florida Legislature with the information necessary to make a decision on whether to remove <br />the dam. If they decide for removal and restoration of the river, then additional research and assessment <br />will be necessary to prepare dam removal and river restoration plans. In all likelihood, an EIS would be <br />required as part of the permitting process. The assessment studies outlined in Table V would provide a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.