Laserfiche WebLink
Ej <br />I LIST OF FIGURES (continued) <br /> Figure 4.27. Net and gross primary productivity as measured in the floodplain site, August <br /> 1998 ........................................................... 81 <br /> Figure 4.28. Net and gross primary productivity as measured in the floodplain sites, <br /> September 1998 .................................................. 82 <br /> Figure 4.29. Net and gross primary productivity as measured in the backwater sites, August <br /> 1998 ........................................................... 83 <br /> Figure 4.30. Net and gross primary productivity as measured in the backwater sites, <br /> September 1998 .................................................. 84 <br /> Figure 4.31. Net and gross primary productivity as measured in the river, August 1998. <br /> Please note the different scale ....................................... 85 <br />Figure 4.32. Net and gross primary productivity as measured at river sites, September <br />1998 ...........................................................86 <br />Figure 4.33. Organic carbon transport out of depression and terrace sites, 1996 .......... 87 <br />Figure 4.34. Organic carbon transport out of depression and terrace sites, 1997 .......... 88 <br />Figure 4.35. Organic carbon transport out of manipulated and natural sites, 1997 ......... 89 <br /> Figure 5.1. Species composition comparison of floodplain wetlands in sub-reaches 1-3 <br /> (fyke net catch) 1996-1998 ........................................ 125 <br /> Figure 5.2. Species composition comparison of floodplain wetlands in sub-reaches 3-6 <br /> (fyke net catch) 1996-1998 ........................................ 126 <br /> Figure 5.3. Comparison of total fyke net catch by number with associated CPUE (Phr) <br /> for all floodplain wetlands sampled 1996-1998 ......................... 127 <br /> Figure 5.4. Comparison of total light trap catch for floodplain wetlands 1996-1997 ..... 128 <br /> <br />Figure 5.5. <br />River reach backwater seining species composition comparison 1997 and ., <br /> <br />145- <br /> 1998 .......................................................... <br />Figure 5.6. Comparison of total catch by number with associated CPUE (f/lOm3) for <br />backwater seining 1997 and 1998 ............................... . 146 <br />xii