Laserfiche WebLink
nonnative fishes that are potential or existing threats to <br />endangered or other native fishes in the UCRB (Objective 2). <br />Physicochemical approaches are the most promising control <br />option for most nonnative cypriniform fishes. Correlative <br />evidence has demonstrated that relative abundance of red shiner <br />Cyprinella lutrensis, sand shiner Notropis stramineus, fathead <br />minnow Pimephales promelas, and redside shiner Richardsonius <br />balteatus is negatively affected by high river discharges and <br />associated lower water temperatures. Selective control of common <br />carp Cyprinus carpio and white sucker Catostomus commersoni will <br />probably require a combination of physicochemical approaches and <br />mechanical or chemical treatments. <br />The other nonnative fishes of concern are sport fishes. <br />Mechanical removal is the most promising method to selectively <br />control channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus and black bullhead <br />Ameiurus melas. Further expansion (e.g., increases in relative <br />abundance) of northern pike Esox lucius can be reduced with <br />increased fishing pressure, installation of barriers to prevent <br />downstream movement from reservoirs, and netting and/or <br />electrofishing areas of high concentration. Control measures <br />directed toward centrarchids should begin by reducing their <br />escapement from impoundments. Prevention of future stockings of <br />centrarchids in off-channel habitats or isolating these habitats <br />from river channels would ultimately reduce their abundance <br />throughout the basin. Targeting spawning aggregations for <br />netting, electrofishing, and/or chemical treatment also are <br />7