My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8101
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:54:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8101
Author
Lentsch, L. D., Y. Converse, P. D. Thompson, D. T. A. Crowl and D. C. A. Toline.
Title
Bonytail Reintroduction Plan for the Upper Colorado River Basin - Final Report.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />f? <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />imbedded scales indicate this species is a more specialized divergence from G. <br />robusta. These adaptations may provide an advantage in swift water <br />environments, and small eyes and a terminal mouth may have been adapted as a <br />result of the high sediment load of the Colorado River system (Minckley 1973). <br />Adult bonytail were usually found in eddies and pools near swift <br />currents over silt and boulder substrates (Vanicek and Kramer 1969; Valdez <br />1985). Chart and Cranney (1993) found adult bonytail in zones of mixing water <br />between eddies and runs, whereas humpback chub occupied deep canyon eddies. <br />Since G. elegans are not discernable from other Gila species at 200 mm <br />total length (TL) and smaller, no conclusions can be made about the specific <br />ecology of subadult bonytail in the wild (Vanicek 1967). Most immature Gila <br />have been caught in low velocity, sheltered habitats over silt or occasionally <br />rubble. At age three, however, Vanicek (1967) noted that young bonytail grew <br />faster in length, and roundtail chub grew larger in weight indicating bonytail <br />are longer and leaner, whereas roundtail chub are shorter and heavier. <br />Chart and Cranney (1993) detected diel movement patterns in bonytail <br />with peak activity occurring during crepuscular periods. Seasonal changes in <br />activity were also evident. In winter, peak movement occurred during mornings <br />and the fish were less active overall. Most gross movement occurred in a <br />general downstream direction. The bonytail that survived through the duration <br />of the study eventually remained in localized areas. Also, high discharge <br />appeared to be correlated with greater movement (Chart and Cranney 1993). <br />In the laboratory, Berry and Pimentel (1985) found that although <br />bonytail were better swimmers than Colorado squawfish (Pytochocheilus lucius), <br />bonytail swimming ability was comparable to many other freshwater fish. <br />Bissonette and Crowl (1995) tested velocity and substrate preferences of age-1 <br />fish in a laboratory setting and found that young bonytail exclusively <br />11 <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.