Laserfiche WebLink
In-water Electrical Measurements for <br />Evaluating Electrofishing Systems <br />by <br />A. Lawrence Kolz <br />U.S. Department of Agriculture <br />Denver Wildlife Research Center <br />Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service <br />Denver Federal Center, Building 16 <br />Denver, Colorado 80225 <br />Abstract. The design of electrodes for electrofishing equipment is developed using <br />.in-water electrical measurements that apply to any electrode configuration, and the <br />measurement techniques require only common, inexpensive electrical meters that are <br />readily available to field biologists. Circuit analysis techniques are described for <br />determining the voltage, current, and power requirements for an electrofishing system, <br />and the relation between water conductivity and electrode resistance is demonstrated. <br />Electrode resistance values, voltage profiles, voltage gradient profiles, and comparative <br />indices are presented for 18 common electrodes. The fallacy of monitoring voltage, <br />current, or power as a standardization procedure for electrofishing equipment is <br />discussed in detail. <br />Key words: Anode, cathode, electrical shock, electricity, electrode, electrofishing, fish, <br />voltage gradient. <br />Electrofishing systems, designed for the capture <br />or control of fish, induce electrical power into the <br />water with submerged metal electrodes. These <br />electrodes function as metal-to-water transducers <br />and provide the interface between the power sup- <br />ply and the water. At least two electrodes are <br />necessary to complete an electrical circuit through <br />water, but electrofishing systems are often electri- <br />fied with multiple electrodes (Novotny and Priegel <br />1974). These arrays of electrodes provide addi- <br />tional contacts with the water and alter the size <br />and power density of the resultant electric field. <br />Electrode arrays usually increase a system's area <br />of coverage and enhance operating efficiency. Field <br />personnel should be capable of modifying their <br />electrodes to optimize the performance of their <br />electrofishing equipment for the prevailing condi- <br />tions and to compare the operating characteristics. <br />I present technical information, measurement <br />techniques, and comparative data to assist in the <br />design of these electrodes. <br />Within the past decade, fishery biologists have <br />attempted to monitor and manage fish populations <br />based on indices developed from electrofishing <br />methodologies. These seasonal and time-repetitive <br />surveys demand standardized collection methods <br />(Heidinger et al. 1983; Wiley and Tsai 1983), which <br />require that consistent and comparable electrical <br />parameters be adapted for the sampling. Obvi- <br />ously, one would not expect to seine an equal num- <br />ber of fish with different size nets, and the same is <br />true when electrofishing with dissimilar electric <br />fields. Unfortunately, it is a common error to judge <br />the electrical fields for two electrofishing appara- <br />tus as being operationally similar based on com- <br />parative voltage, current, or power readings at the <br />generator or equipment control panel. The voltage <br />and current controls actually adjust the power <br />being applied into the water, but they do not <br />uniquely determine the intensity of the resulting <br />electric field. Researchers must understand that <br />fish are electroshocked by the distribution and <br />intensity of the electrical energy in the water (Kolz