Laserfiche WebLink
IN-WATER ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS 21 <br />what is being defined as horizontal, vertical, head- <br />to-tail, dorsal-to-ventral, or some other general- <br />ized description for voltage gradient. <br />The directional characteristic of the gradient <br />vector becomes particularly significant when meas- <br />uring the thresholds of electroshock response. Fish <br />are most sensitive when their spinal columns are <br />parallel to the voltage gradient vector (L,arnarque <br />1990). This is not to imply that fish cannot be <br />shocked in other orientations; in fact, fish can even <br />be stunned in an electric field that effectively gen- <br />erates no head-to-tail voltage. There is little infor- <br />mation regarding these directional effects, but one <br />possible explanation (an unproven hypothesis) can <br />be developed by applying Fbyntmg's power vector <br />(Remo and Whinnery 1953). Under this concept, <br />when the direction of electrical current flow is <br />aligned with the spinal column, the power vectors <br />are directed radially inward along the entire longi- <br />tudinal axis of the fish (Fig. 25a). This orientation <br />is optimal for the transfer and dissipation of power <br />into the axis of the spinal column. Conversely, the <br />least favorable orientation for power transfer oc- <br />curs when the direction of electrical current is <br />perpendicular to the spinal column (Fig. 25b). <br />When transverse, there is less opportunity to trans- <br />fer power because the vectors only intersect the <br />width of the spinal column (rather than its entire <br />length), and there is an additional reduction in the <br />power transfer caused by the angular relation be- <br />tween the vectors and the spinal column. <br />Discussion <br />The type of electrode configuration used for any <br />particular electrofishing operation is dependent <br />on a variety of electrical and biological factors. <br />The guidelines for selecting an electrode design <br />must include a knowledge of the following factors: <br />power capabilities of the electrical source, desired <br />size and intensity of the electric field, estimates of <br />the thresholds of electroshock response for the <br />fish to be sampled, how power density can be <br />adjusted for changes in water conductivity, and <br />special considerations regarding the working <br />habitat (aquatic plants, poor water clarity, fast <br />water, feeding areas, hazards, maneuverability, <br />etc.). I described a generalized approach with ap- <br />propriate measurement techniques to allow re- <br />searchers to compare, measure, and adapt elec- <br />trode designs to best accomplish a particular need. <br />Remember there is no such thing as the univer- <br />sally perfect electrode. <br />Power Vectors <br />i ? 11 f <br />/(O D1 <br />Z"Of v Q119 *\\ <br />Power Vectors <br />i i <br />Fig. 25. Diagrams illustrate how power vectors intersect <br />and transmit energy into the spinal column of a fish: <br />(a) Power vectors intersect the entire length of the <br />spinal column for a maximum transfer of energy when <br />the spine is parallel to the direction of the electrical <br />current. (b) Power vectors intersect only the width of <br />the spinal column for a minimal transfer of energy <br />when the spine is perpendicular to the direction of the <br />electrical current. <br />The determination of an electrode's resistance <br />and the development of the in-water voltage profiles