My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7792
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7792
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:53:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7792
Author
Kolz, A. L.
Title
In-water Electrical Measurements for Evaluating Electrofishing Systems.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ix-wATES ELEcTRicAL MEASUREMENTS 11 <br />The voltage gradient probe is usually inserted <br />into the electric field at a near-vertical angle to the <br />surface of the water. When positioned in the water, <br />the probe must be rotated for a maximum reading <br />because voltage gradient is a vector (directional) <br />quantity (Rogers 1954). The CRO or DVM will <br />indicate two maxima and two nulls with each ro- <br />tation of the probe. By probing a volume of electri- <br />fied water at known depths, the gradient readings <br />at each depth may be plotted to create a family of <br />voltage gradient maps (analogous to a geographic <br />contour map) for a three-dimensional analysis. It <br />is often convenient to have predetermined those <br />thresholds of voltage gradient having biological <br />importance (electrotaxis, stun, tetany, etc.) and to <br />just locate these constant gradient loci in the <br />water. Explicit voltage gradient maps are not al- <br />ways necessary for comparing electrode arrays. <br />boom above the water. This electrode configura- <br />tion became popular following its description by <br />Novotny and Priegel (1974) and is commonly <br />known as the Wisconsin array. Seven variations <br />of this array were tested. Four of the arrays were <br />constructed by using a 30.5-cm-diameter ring to <br />support four or six 60-cm-long cylinders with <br />diameters of 0.64 or 2.54 cm. The cylinders were <br />spaced equidistantly around the circumference <br />of the supporting ring. The other three arrays <br />were constructed similarly except that a 58-cm <br />ring provided the support for 4 or 6 droppers, and <br />the cylinder diameters were 0.64 or 2.54 cm. <br />Vertical plates. Flat aluminum plates measuring <br />0.32 cm thick by 122 cm wide were immersed <br />vertically into the water to depths of 15.2, 30.5, <br />and 45.7 cm. <br />Test Procedures <br />The empirical data compiled for this study used <br />only voltage profiles (method 1); the voltage gradi- <br />ent probe (method 2) was not applied as a meas- <br />urement tool. Voltage profiles were recorded for 18 <br />balanced electrode configurations. <br />Description of the Test Electrodes <br />Five basic electrode configurations were se- <br />lected as representative of the geometric shapes <br />common to electrofishing applications: spheres, <br />cylinders, circular loops, Wisconsin arrays, and <br />vertical plates. <br />Spheres. Two sizes of spheres, 15.2 and 27.7 cm <br />diameter, were measured at immersion depths of <br />30 and 40 cm, respectively. <br />Cylinders. The voltage profiles for four sizes of <br />cylinders, with diameters of 0.64,1.27, 2.54, and <br />5.08 cm, were recorded. All cylinders were im- <br />mersed vertically from the water's surface to a <br />depth of 60 cm. <br />Loops. Two horizontal loops were suspended in <br />the water at a depth of 30 cm. The smaller loop <br />measured 36 cm in diameter and was con- <br />structed with 0.64-cm-diameter tubing. The <br />larger loop was 61 cm in diameter and was con- <br />structed with 1.27-cm-diameter tubing. <br />Wisconsin arrays. A common electrofishing ar- <br />ray consists of vertical cylinders (often called <br />rods or droppers) suspended into the water from <br />a supporting circular ring that is attached to a <br />Measurement Site and Techniques <br />The electrode measurements were conducted at <br />the Hydraulics Research Laboratory of the Bu- <br />reau of Reclamation in Denver, Colorado. This <br />facility has numerous 3-m-wide indoor canals <br />constructed with concrete walls and floors. The <br />minimum water depth was 1.4 in, and the canals <br />were fully accessible from above through a grid <br />of metal grates. The water conductivity varied <br />from 111 to 190 µS/cm. The voltage data were <br />recorded only during those periods when the <br />canals were not in major use by other re- <br />searchers; the surface of the water was usually <br />almost mirror-perfect. Each pair of test elec- <br />trodes was powered by a voltage-adjustable <br />autotransformer operating from a standard 60- <br />Hz AC main. The applied voltage was consis- <br />tently set to 100 volts so that each balanced <br />electrode dissipated 50 volts. For added safety <br />and the elimination of possible leakage currents, <br />the autotransformer was connected to the mains <br />through an isolation transformer. The section of <br />canal in which the electrodes were measured was <br />found to be free of any metal structures that might <br />create a shock hazard or distort the electric field. <br />For recording the voltage profiles, a wooden <br />beam was fitted with a centimeter scale for meas- <br />uring distance and suspended above the center of <br />the canal between the test electrodes. A bracket <br />was constructed to slide along this beam and sup- <br />port the "bared" voltmeter lead that was weighted <br />vertically into the water. In this manner, the end <br />of the wire extending into the water could be <br />adjusted to any desired depth, and the slider was
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.