My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7842
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:53:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7842
Author
Knopf, F. L.
Title
Biological Diversity in Wildlife Management.
USFW Year
1992.
USFW - Doc Type
1992.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 2. The goals and founder status of four captive breeding programs with reintroduction com- <br />ponents. Species listed in order of increasing number of generations encompassed in the program <br />length. <br />Species <br />California Black-footed Golden lion <br />condor, ferret Guam rail tamarin <br />Heterozygosity goal 90 percent 90 percent 90 percent 90 percent <br />Length of program <br />(years) 200 50 50 200 <br />Number of <br />generations 10 20 22 33 <br />Target population size 150 500 150 550 <br />Number wild-caught 14 18 21 691 <br />Number of <br />contributing <br />founderse 13 10 13 45 <br />Founder genome <br />equivalents, 8 5 5 12 <br />'Heterozygosity goal, program length and target population size have not been officially adopted by program <br />managers; other data from Kieler (1991). <br />'Founders with currently living descendants. <br />`The number of theoretically ideal founders taking into consideration loss of genetic diversity in the current captive <br />population (Lacy 1989). <br />'Includes the number of wild-caught tamarins acquired after the captive program was initiated in 1981 in addition <br />to the number of founders and wild-caught individuals alive at the initiation of the program. <br />their descendants) were already in captivity when the tamarin program was initiated <br />in 1981 (Figure 2, A). However, wild animals continue to be available; the 24 wild <br />tamarins that have been added to the captive population since its initiation were <br />animals turned over to the captive breeding program by authorities that had confis- <br />cated tamarins illegally captured from wild populations. In addition, interactive <br />management of the captive and wild tamarin population should expand the founder <br />base for the captive population in the future. <br />Capturing all the individuals at one location may not obtain an adequate sample <br />of the taxon's genetic diversity (Templeton 1990). Genetic surveys of the wild <br />population(s) using electrophoretic or molecular techniques may be helpful in de- <br />termining the geographic distribution of genetic variation in the wild and devising <br />the best sampling plan. <br />Unfortunately, the number of wild animals captured usually does not translate <br />directly into the number of founders. Wild-caught animals may be related, fail to <br />breed or, if they do breed, their descendants may fail to reproduce. For example, <br />although 25 wild ferrets were captured from Meeteetsee, Wyoming, the first 6 died <br />of distemper (Thorne and Belitsky 1989). Several others were known to be parents <br />and offspring, thus reducing the number of potential founders to only 10 presumably <br />unrelated individuals (Ballow and Oakleaf 1989). Furthermore, some potential ferret <br />founders failed to reproduce, while those that did have reproduced unequally, severely <br />skewing their genetic contribution to the population's gene pool. Such processes <br />further erode the genetic contribution of the founders (Lacy 1989). As a result, the <br />current ferret population is founded by the theoretical equivalent (founder genome <br />Managing Genetic Diversity ? 273
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.