My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8259
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:53:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8259
Author
Kircher, J. E.
Title
Sediment Transport and Source Areas of Sediment and Runoff, Big Sandy River Basin, Wyoming.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Water-Resources Investigations 81-72,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The hydrographs for Pacific Creek and the Big Sandy River below Eden <br />for water year 1968 (fig. 15) show the coincidence of the spring runoff <br />from Pacific Creek with the peak flow in the Big Sandy River below Eden. <br />The hydrographs also show a peak flow during the summer, indicating that <br />water was released from the Big Sandy Reservoir that year with some flow <br />coming from irrigation return flows. Little Sandy Creek contributes <br />little to the flow of the Big Sandy River because flow is diverted to the <br />Eden Valley Reservoir. <br />Streamflow data are summarized for seven gaging stations within the <br />basin in table 4, which shows the period of record for each gaging sta- <br />tion, the drainage area, the mean annual discharge, and the effects of <br />man on the individual streams near each gaging station. The mean annual <br />runoffs are variable within the basin, ranging from rates of about 1.0 <br />cubic foot per second per square mile at station 09214000, Little Sandy <br />Creek near Elkhorn, to about 0.01 cubic foot per second per square mile <br />at station 09215000, Pacific Creek near Farson. <br />CHANNEL SHAPE AND SIZE <br />The shape of stream channels is highly organized and is similar for <br />rivers of the same size in comparable climatic and geologic settings. <br />Channel shape is a complex result of many interacting factors of which <br />there are two general classes: (1) Factors related to the size, lith- <br />ology, amount, and depositional forms of the sediment load and (2) <br />hydraulic factors related to water flow. The channel is formed by the <br />water in the channel and the sediment it carries. <br />The hydraulic geometry exhibits the consistent manner in which <br />natural stream channels are shaped to carry water and sediment load <br />imposed from upstream. This consistency indicates that natural channels, <br />self-formed and self-maintained, seek a shape and size consistent with <br />the sediment yield and water discharge. Alteration in this natural shape <br />and size will lead to erosion or deposition as the channel processes <br />operate toward re-establishment of quasi-equilibrium under the new condi- <br />tions. <br />Data to prepare relations of hydraulic geometry for all the <br />streamflow-gaging stations given in table 5 were obtained from discharge <br />measurements. All open-water discharge measurements for each station <br />were used with no biasing by elimination of data. <br />These data were transformed using logarithms and a two-variable <br />regression run to arrive at the power function of the form y = aXn and, <br />in this instance: <br />W = aQb? (1) <br />D = cQf, and (2) <br />V=kQm (3), <br />17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.