Laserfiche WebLink
as 4 days post-peak in 1992 (low flow year) and as much as 39 days post-peak in 1995 (high flow year). <br />The same relationship was observed above the canyon. Water temperature was a more consistent <br />predictor of chub spawning than river flow. Spawning commenced above the canyon when river temps <br />reached 18°C, in 1992, 1993 and 1994, and at 17°C in 1996. In Westwater Canyon, spawning was <br />initiated at river temps ranging from 17-20°C during the five years YOY were collected there. <br />Growth of Age 0 Chubs <br />Young of year chub daily growth rates (mm /day) were calculated for the months of July and <br />August when sample sizes exceeded 5 fish on two occasions per month. Monthly growth rates ranged <br />from a project low of 0.15 recorded above the canyon during August, 1995, to a high of 0.83 in the <br />canyon during August, 1994. A positive correlation (Rz= 0.59; p=0.02) was found between the monthly <br />growth rates and respective monthly degree days (>20 C) (Figure 6). <br />Chub YOY Cohort Relative Abundance <br />Sampling for YOY occurred throughout the summer, but many of the following analyses <br />considered only July and August collection data. During these months, YOY were most abundant and <br />still preferred low velocity areas opposed to flowing water habitats. This shift in habitat preference <br />typically occurred in September or when the YOY grew to 40 - SOmm TL. [During the September, <br />1996, fish community trip more YOY were collected electrofishing the shoreline than with seines in low <br />velocity areas.] Young of year chubs were collected in all three sample sub-reaches with 1668 collected <br />above the canyon, 1477 in Westwater Canyon, and 71 below the canyon. Young of year chubs were <br />present in sub-reach samples with the following frequencies of occurrence: 81.5% (n=27) above the <br />canyon, 55.17% (n=29) within the canyon, and 58.3% (n=26) below the canyon. <br />Catch rates (fish / mZ) were significantly (F=3.036; p=0.002) more variable above the canyon <br />than within it. Project mean catch rates per strata were greatest above the canyon (Table 4). <br />Instantaneous catch rates in this uppermost strata ranged from a project high of 2.28 observed on 02 Aug <br />93 to zero recorded on several occasions (Figure 7). Within the canyon, CPE ranged from a high of 1.42 <br />recorded on 15 Aug 96 to a low of zero recorded on several occasions, particularly in May, June and <br />early July. Below the canyon, catch rates ranged from a high of 0.24 recorded on 29 Ju194 to zero and <br />were significantly less (t=2.413; df=28; p=.022; canyon vs below canyon) than the upper strata catch <br />rates. <br />Table 4. Annual mean catch per unit effort (fish /mz) and standard en or for each of three Colorado <br />River sampling strata: Above Canyon (RK 204 - 199.4); Canyon (RK 199.2- 190.4), and <br />Below Canyon (RK 186.4 - 176.8), Utah. 1992-1996. <br />ABOVE CANYON CANYON BELOW CANYON <br /> n+ cpe* S.E. n+ cpe* S.E. n+ cpe* S.E. <br />1992 4 .034 .0 ] 4 4 .321 .196 4 .017 .008 <br />1993 6 .679 .154 6 .086 .028 4 .024 .009 <br />1994 8 .062 .019 8 .175 .032 6 .034 .016 <br />1995 5 .007 .OOI 7 .012 .005 7 .002 .0007 <br />1996 4 .607 .249 4 .673 .153 4 .018 .006 <br />~ampung occasions <br />* grand average of total cpe per strata <br />7 <br />