My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9513
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:51:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9513
Author
Kuhn, G. and C. A. Williams.
Title
Evaluation of Streamflow Losses Along the Gunnison River from Whitewater Downstream to the Redlands Canal Diversion Dam, near Grand Junction Colorado, Water Years 1995-2003.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Reston, VA.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Evaluation of Streamflow Losses Along the Gunnison <br />River from Whitewater Downstream to the Redlands <br />Canal Diversion Dam, near Grand Junction, Colorado, <br />Wate r Yea rs 1995-2003 <br />By Gerhard Kuhn and Cory A. Williams <br />Abstract <br />In 2003, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Upper Colorado River <br />Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Colorado River Water <br />Conservation District, Colorado Division of Water Resources, <br />and Bureau of Reclamation, initiated a study to characterize <br />Streamflow losses along a reach of the Gunnison River from the <br />town of Whitewater downstream to the Redlands Canal diver- <br />sion dam. This report describes the methods and results of the <br />study that include: (1) a detailed mass-balance analysis of his- <br />torical discharge records that were available for the three <br />streamflow-gaging stations along the study reach; and (2) two <br />sets of discharge measurements that were made at the three sta- <br />tions and at four additional locations. <br />Data for these existing streamflow-gaging stations were <br />compiled and analyzed: (1) Gunnison River near Grand Junc- <br />tion (Whitewater station); (2) Gunnison River below Redlands <br />Canal diversion dam (below-Redlands-dam station); and (3) <br />Redlands Canal near Grand Junction (Redlands-Canal station). <br />Data for water years 1995-2003 were used for the mass-balance <br />analysis. Four intermediate sites (Ml, M2, M3, and M4) were <br />selected for discharge measurements in addition to the existing <br />stations. The study reach is the approximate 12-mile reach of <br />the Gunnison River from the Whitewater station downstream to <br />the Redlands Canal diversion dam, which is about 3 miles <br />upstream from the confluence with the Colorado River. <br />For the mass-balance analysis, differences between the <br />sum of the annual cumulative daily mean discharge at the two <br />downstream stations and the annual cumulative daily mean <br />discharges at the upstream station ranged from about -28,700 to <br />-69,800 acre-feet (about -1.1 to -5.8 percent), indicating that <br />the downstream discharges generally were less than the <br />upstream discharges. Moving 3-day daily mean discharge aver- <br />agesalso were computed for each of the three stations to smooth <br />out some of the abrupt differences between the downstream and <br />upstream daily mean discharges. During water years 1995- <br />2002, differences between the downstream and upstream <br />moving 3-day daily mean discharges ranged from about -200 to <br />+100 cubic feet per second (ft3/s) (about -10 to 1 percent) <br />during one-half of each year, but the differences had <br />absolute values as large as about 500 to 1,000 ft3/s (about <br />-60 to +50 percent) during the other one-half of the year. <br />Two sets of discharge measurements were obtained during <br />water year 2003. For measurement set 1 (February 5-6), <br />discharge was measured 5-8 times over a 24-hour period at sites <br />M1-M4, where measured discharges ranged from 527 to <br />608 ft3/s. Discharge was measured once each day at the White- <br />water and below-Redlands-dam stations to verify discharge <br />rating shifts; the Redlands Canal was not in operation at this <br />time, so measurements were not needed at the Redlands-Canal <br />station. Recorded 15-minute (unit) discharges ranged from <br />about 575 to 615 ft3/s at the Whitewater station and from about <br />560 to 600 ft3/s at the below-Redlands-dam station during the <br />February 5-6 period. Because of the inherent error in discharge <br />measurements (5 percent for measurements rated good), and <br />because the mean discharge at the below-Redlands-dam station, <br />about 580 ft3/s, was only about 2.5 percent smaller than the <br />mean discharge at the Whitewater station, about 595 ft3/s, it is <br />concluded that there was no measurable streamflow loss along <br />the study reach during measurement set 1. <br />For measurement set 2 (May 14-15), discharge in the <br />Gunnison River was about 2,000 ft3/s and increasing because <br />of high-elevation snowmelt. Five discharge measurements <br />were made at site M2, and discharge ranged from 1,668 to <br />2,117 ft3/s. Measured discharges at the gaging stations were <br />2,730 ft3/s at the Whitewater station, 1,268 ft3/s at the below- <br />Redlands-dam station, and 819 ft3/s at the Redlands-Canal <br />station. In a hydrographic analysis of unit discharges during <br />May 14-15, and using an estimated traveltime of about 1.5 <br />hours, the discharge measurements made at site M2 correlated <br />closely with the unit discharges recorded about 1.5 hours earlier <br />at the Whitewater station. Also, by using an estimated travel- <br />time of about 3.5 hours, the sum of the unit discharges at the <br />below-Redlands-dam and Redlands-Canal stations also corre- <br />lated closely to the unit discharges recorded about 3.5 hours <br />earlier at the Whitewater station. Based on these results, it is <br />concluded that there also was no measurable streamflow loss in <br />the study reach during measurement set 2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.