Laserfiche WebLink
Evaluation of Streamflow Losses Along the Gunnison <br />River from Whitewater Downstream to the Redlands <br />Canal Diversion Dam, near Grand Junction, Colorado, <br />Wate r Yea rs 1995-2003 <br />By Gerhard Kuhn and Cory A. Williams <br />Abstract <br />In 2003, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Upper Colorado River <br />Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Colorado River Water <br />Conservation District, Colorado Division of Water Resources, <br />and Bureau of Reclamation, initiated a study to characterize <br />Streamflow losses along a reach of the Gunnison River from the <br />town of Whitewater downstream to the Redlands Canal diver- <br />sion dam. This report describes the methods and results of the <br />study that include: (1) a detailed mass-balance analysis of his- <br />torical discharge records that were available for the three <br />streamflow-gaging stations along the study reach; and (2) two <br />sets of discharge measurements that were made at the three sta- <br />tions and at four additional locations. <br />Data for these existing streamflow-gaging stations were <br />compiled and analyzed: (1) Gunnison River near Grand Junc- <br />tion (Whitewater station); (2) Gunnison River below Redlands <br />Canal diversion dam (below-Redlands-dam station); and (3) <br />Redlands Canal near Grand Junction (Redlands-Canal station). <br />Data for water years 1995-2003 were used for the mass-balance <br />analysis. Four intermediate sites (Ml, M2, M3, and M4) were <br />selected for discharge measurements in addition to the existing <br />stations. The study reach is the approximate 12-mile reach of <br />the Gunnison River from the Whitewater station downstream to <br />the Redlands Canal diversion dam, which is about 3 miles <br />upstream from the confluence with the Colorado River. <br />For the mass-balance analysis, differences between the <br />sum of the annual cumulative daily mean discharge at the two <br />downstream stations and the annual cumulative daily mean <br />discharges at the upstream station ranged from about -28,700 to <br />-69,800 acre-feet (about -1.1 to -5.8 percent), indicating that <br />the downstream discharges generally were less than the <br />upstream discharges. Moving 3-day daily mean discharge aver- <br />agesalso were computed for each of the three stations to smooth <br />out some of the abrupt differences between the downstream and <br />upstream daily mean discharges. During water years 1995- <br />2002, differences between the downstream and upstream <br />moving 3-day daily mean discharges ranged from about -200 to <br />+100 cubic feet per second (ft3/s) (about -10 to 1 percent) <br />during one-half of each year, but the differences had <br />absolute values as large as about 500 to 1,000 ft3/s (about <br />-60 to +50 percent) during the other one-half of the year. <br />Two sets of discharge measurements were obtained during <br />water year 2003. For measurement set 1 (February 5-6), <br />discharge was measured 5-8 times over a 24-hour period at sites <br />M1-M4, where measured discharges ranged from 527 to <br />608 ft3/s. Discharge was measured once each day at the White- <br />water and below-Redlands-dam stations to verify discharge <br />rating shifts; the Redlands Canal was not in operation at this <br />time, so measurements were not needed at the Redlands-Canal <br />station. Recorded 15-minute (unit) discharges ranged from <br />about 575 to 615 ft3/s at the Whitewater station and from about <br />560 to 600 ft3/s at the below-Redlands-dam station during the <br />February 5-6 period. Because of the inherent error in discharge <br />measurements (5 percent for measurements rated good), and <br />because the mean discharge at the below-Redlands-dam station, <br />about 580 ft3/s, was only about 2.5 percent smaller than the <br />mean discharge at the Whitewater station, about 595 ft3/s, it is <br />concluded that there was no measurable streamflow loss along <br />the study reach during measurement set 1. <br />For measurement set 2 (May 14-15), discharge in the <br />Gunnison River was about 2,000 ft3/s and increasing because <br />of high-elevation snowmelt. Five discharge measurements <br />were made at site M2, and discharge ranged from 1,668 to <br />2,117 ft3/s. Measured discharges at the gaging stations were <br />2,730 ft3/s at the Whitewater station, 1,268 ft3/s at the below- <br />Redlands-dam station, and 819 ft3/s at the Redlands-Canal <br />station. In a hydrographic analysis of unit discharges during <br />May 14-15, and using an estimated traveltime of about 1.5 <br />hours, the discharge measurements made at site M2 correlated <br />closely with the unit discharges recorded about 1.5 hours earlier <br />at the Whitewater station. Also, by using an estimated travel- <br />time of about 3.5 hours, the sum of the unit discharges at the <br />below-Redlands-dam and Redlands-Canal stations also corre- <br />lated closely to the unit discharges recorded about 3.5 hours <br />earlier at the Whitewater station. Based on these results, it is <br />concluded that there also was no measurable streamflow loss in <br />the study reach during measurement set 2. <br />