Laserfiche WebLink
10 Evaluation of Streamflow Losses Along the Gunnison River from Whitewater Downstream to the Redlands Canal Diversion <br />Dam, near Grand Junction, Colorado, Water Years 199x2003 <br />1,000 <br />soo <br />U <br />[0 ~ <br />~ Z <br />z ~ 800 <br />ui ~ <br />C7 ~ <br />w <br />~ 700 <br />UW <br />~w <br />o " <br />600 <br />500 <br />0.2 <br />0.1 <br />H <br />W <br />W <br />LL <br />? 0.0 <br />H <br />2 <br />-0.1 <br />-0.2 <br />4 <br />w <br />U <br />Z 2 <br />w <br />w <br />W <br />w <br />0 <br />w 0 <br />L3 <br />H <br />Z <br />W <br />U <br />w -2 <br />a <br /> <br /> wi <br /> •• • • • • • <br /> <br />• <br />•• • • <br />• • <br /> <br />•••• <br />• • • • <br /> <br />i <br /> ____ _ _________ _____ __ _ ___ __ <br /> <br /> • • •• • • <br /> N • <br /> <br />N ~ •• • •• <br /> • <br />•• j N <br /> .. <br /> <br /> ... .. <br /> <br />• <br />1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 <br />WATER YEAR <br />Figure 5. Discharge, shift, and percentage difference between discharge and discharge rating for measurements <br />made at the Redlands-Canal station, water years 1995-2002. <br />sum of the 3-day daily mean discharges at the two downstream An example of the moving 3-day daily mean discharges at <br />stations and the 3-day daily mean discharge at the upstream sta- the three stations along the study reach, the sum of the 3-day <br />tion, for additional analyses. The moving 3-day daily mean was daily mean discharges at the two downstream stations, and the <br />used because the sum of the daily mean discharge at the down- differences between the downstream and upstream discharges <br />stream stations almost never is the same as the daily mean dis- for WY 1996 are shown in figure 7. The characteristics of <br />charge at the upstream station because of traveltime effects, the data for the other WYs (excluding WY 2003) were similar. <br />even with no loss or gain in the reach; a moving 3-day daily Most of the discharge differences are between -200 and <br />mean could smooth out some of the abrupt differences between +100 ft3/s and most of the percentage differences are between <br />the daily mean discharges attributed to traveltime. More com- -10 and 0 percent (fig. 7). The differences between the 3-day <br />plex analytical methods, such as those involving computerized daily mean discharge sum at the two downstream stations and <br />streamflow routing programs, were beyond the scope of this the 3-day daily mean discharge at the upstream station seem to <br />study. be smaller in figure 7A in comparison to figure 7B; this prima- <br />- • •••I • • • . • • • • • <br />' • • •• <br /> <br />~-•~a-•-- <br />----•~--- <br />• <br />ii <br />~•~~-~•r , <br />r-••r•-•af•N ••M-~•~••w ~~~t • <br />t••-~~-~a•• <br />••r•-•-- <br />- • •• • I, • • • ~ • • • • <br />