My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9513
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:51:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9513
Author
Kuhn, G. and C. A. Williams.
Title
Evaluation of Streamflow Losses Along the Gunnison River from Whitewater Downstream to the Redlands Canal Diversion Dam, near Grand Junction Colorado, Water Years 1995-2003.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Reston, VA.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10 Evaluation of Streamflow Losses Along the Gunnison River from Whitewater Downstream to the Redlands Canal Diversion <br />Dam, near Grand Junction, Colorado, Water Years 199x2003 <br />1,000 <br />soo <br />U <br />[0 ~ <br />~ Z <br />z ~ 800 <br />ui ~ <br />C7 ~ <br />w <br />~ 700 <br />UW <br />~w <br />o " <br />600 <br />500 <br />0.2 <br />0.1 <br />H <br />W <br />W <br />LL <br />? 0.0 <br />H <br />2 <br />-0.1 <br />-0.2 <br />4 <br />w <br />U <br />Z 2 <br />w <br />w <br />W <br />w <br />0 <br />w 0 <br />L3 <br />H <br />Z <br />W <br />U <br />w -2 <br />a <br /> <br /> wi <br /> •• • • • • • <br /> <br />• <br />•• • • <br />• • <br /> <br />•••• <br />• • • • <br /> <br />i <br /> ____ _ _________ _____ __ _ ___ __ <br /> <br /> • • •• • • <br /> N • <br /> <br />N ~ •• • •• <br /> • <br />•• j N <br /> .. <br /> <br /> ... .. <br /> <br />• <br />1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 <br />WATER YEAR <br />Figure 5. Discharge, shift, and percentage difference between discharge and discharge rating for measurements <br />made at the Redlands-Canal station, water years 1995-2002. <br />sum of the 3-day daily mean discharges at the two downstream An example of the moving 3-day daily mean discharges at <br />stations and the 3-day daily mean discharge at the upstream sta- the three stations along the study reach, the sum of the 3-day <br />tion, for additional analyses. The moving 3-day daily mean was daily mean discharges at the two downstream stations, and the <br />used because the sum of the daily mean discharge at the down- differences between the downstream and upstream discharges <br />stream stations almost never is the same as the daily mean dis- for WY 1996 are shown in figure 7. The characteristics of <br />charge at the upstream station because of traveltime effects, the data for the other WYs (excluding WY 2003) were similar. <br />even with no loss or gain in the reach; a moving 3-day daily Most of the discharge differences are between -200 and <br />mean could smooth out some of the abrupt differences between +100 ft3/s and most of the percentage differences are between <br />the daily mean discharges attributed to traveltime. More com- -10 and 0 percent (fig. 7). The differences between the 3-day <br />plex analytical methods, such as those involving computerized daily mean discharge sum at the two downstream stations and <br />streamflow routing programs, were beyond the scope of this the 3-day daily mean discharge at the upstream station seem to <br />study. be smaller in figure 7A in comparison to figure 7B; this prima- <br />- • •••I • • • . • • • • • <br />' • • •• <br /> <br />~-•~a-•-- <br />----•~--- <br />• <br />ii <br />~•~~-~•r , <br />r-••r•-•af•N ••M-~•~••w ~~~t • <br />t••-~~-~a•• <br />••r•-•-- <br />- • •• • I, • • • ~ • • • • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.