Laserfiche WebLink
8 Evaluation of Streamflow Losses Along the Gunnison River from Whitewater Downstream to the Redlands Canal Diversion <br />Dam, near Grand Junction, Colorado, Water Years 1995-2003 <br /> 20,000 <br /> 10,000 <br />m p 7,000 <br />~z <br />U O 5,000 <br />z <br />w <br />~ w 3,000 <br />¢ a <br />_ ~ 2,000 <br />Uw <br />Uw <br />o" <br /> 1,000 <br /> 700 <br /> 500 <br />0.4 <br />0.3 <br />F <br />w <br />~ 0.2 <br />Z <br />F <br />0.1 <br />0.0 <br />-0.1 <br />8 <br />w <br />z 4 <br />w <br />Q <br />w <br />w <br />w <br />0 <br />w 0 <br />C7 <br />F <br />z <br />w <br />U <br />~ -4 <br />w <br />a <br />-8 <br />1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 <br />WATER YEAR <br />Figure 3. Discharge, shift, and percentage difference between discharge and discharge rating for measurements made <br />at the Whitewater station, water years 1995-2002. <br />Results for Water Years 199rr2002 <br />When the discharge mass-balance analysis was made, data <br />for WY 2003 were not completed, so the analysis was made <br />only for WYs 1995-2002. Because final, published daily mean <br />discharge data were not available for the below-Redlands-dam <br />station, the archived, real-time unit (15-minute) data were <br />obtained (Jerry Thrush, Colorado Division of Water Resources, <br />written commun., 2003) and daily mean discharges for the <br />below-Redlands-dam station were computed from these data. <br />• <br />• <br />', •. <br />• • I <br />I • I <br />~~ <br />~'i <br />', '~ <br /> • ~. ~ • • • <br />~ ~ -- - <br /> • • <br /> • ~ • ', • • <br /> <br /> • <br /> -------- <br />• • • <br /> <br />• • <br />• ~ • ~ • <br /> • • <br /> <br />• <br />- • ~ <br /> ~ <br /> <br />i • <br /> <br />Some of the unit-discharge values were missing because the <br />unit-stage values were not recorded for a variety of reasons. For <br />days with missing unit data, the mean of the available data was <br />used provided that no more than about 25 percent of the unit <br />values were missing. For days that the number of missing data <br />exceeded 25-percent, the daily mean discharge was estimated <br />(sometimes for more than 1 day) by linear interpolation <br />between the daily mean discharges on the adjacent days that had <br />a computed daily mean discharge. The interpolated values also <br />were compared to the difference between daily mean discharge <br />