My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9513
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:51:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9513
Author
Kuhn, G. and C. A. Williams.
Title
Evaluation of Streamflow Losses Along the Gunnison River from Whitewater Downstream to the Redlands Canal Diversion Dam, near Grand Junction Colorado, Water Years 1995-2003.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Reston, VA.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8 Evaluation of Streamflow Losses Along the Gunnison River from Whitewater Downstream to the Redlands Canal Diversion <br />Dam, near Grand Junction, Colorado, Water Years 1995-2003 <br /> 20,000 <br /> 10,000 <br />m p 7,000 <br />~z <br />U O 5,000 <br />z <br />w <br />~ w 3,000 <br />¢ a <br />_ ~ 2,000 <br />Uw <br />Uw <br />o" <br /> 1,000 <br /> 700 <br /> 500 <br />0.4 <br />0.3 <br />F <br />w <br />~ 0.2 <br />Z <br />F <br />0.1 <br />0.0 <br />-0.1 <br />8 <br />w <br />z 4 <br />w <br />Q <br />w <br />w <br />w <br />0 <br />w 0 <br />C7 <br />F <br />z <br />w <br />U <br />~ -4 <br />w <br />a <br />-8 <br />1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 <br />WATER YEAR <br />Figure 3. Discharge, shift, and percentage difference between discharge and discharge rating for measurements made <br />at the Whitewater station, water years 1995-2002. <br />Results for Water Years 199rr2002 <br />When the discharge mass-balance analysis was made, data <br />for WY 2003 were not completed, so the analysis was made <br />only for WYs 1995-2002. Because final, published daily mean <br />discharge data were not available for the below-Redlands-dam <br />station, the archived, real-time unit (15-minute) data were <br />obtained (Jerry Thrush, Colorado Division of Water Resources, <br />written commun., 2003) and daily mean discharges for the <br />below-Redlands-dam station were computed from these data. <br />• <br />• <br />', •. <br />• • I <br />I • I <br />~~ <br />~'i <br />', '~ <br /> • ~. ~ • • • <br />~ ~ -- - <br /> • • <br /> • ~ • ', • • <br /> <br /> • <br /> -------- <br />• • • <br /> <br />• • <br />• ~ • ~ • <br /> • • <br /> <br />• <br />- • ~ <br /> ~ <br /> <br />i • <br /> <br />Some of the unit-discharge values were missing because the <br />unit-stage values were not recorded for a variety of reasons. For <br />days with missing unit data, the mean of the available data was <br />used provided that no more than about 25 percent of the unit <br />values were missing. For days that the number of missing data <br />exceeded 25-percent, the daily mean discharge was estimated <br />(sometimes for more than 1 day) by linear interpolation <br />between the daily mean discharges on the adjacent days that had <br />a computed daily mean discharge. The interpolated values also <br />were compared to the difference between daily mean discharge <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.